Jackolantern
Registered Users (C)
Officers aren't perfect with their knowledge of the law. It is VERY common for them to be wrong. They have to make on-the-spot decisions and they don't carry a law library in the back of their car. They will do things like give you a ticket for an illegal left turn, but when you go to court it is proven the turn was legal at that location. Some will perform searches improperly in a way that causes the evidence to get thrown out in court because the manner of the search violated the law. There are various ifs and buts and precedents that they don't know off the top of their head when talking to you at the scene.I don't see what the officer has to gain by not telling the law like it is; that's part of his job. Sure it's always advisable to double check the law, but if an officer stops you and tells you what it is, you could pretty much bet it's true, unless you're paranoid and think everyone is out to get you.
Holding a non-driver responsible for the driver's ticket is dubious on its face, so it should be checked out before paying such a massive amount. It may be valid to do that in some circumstances, but not necessarily the specific scenario described by the OP. Maybe the OP is responsible only for the $500 ticket and not the $1050 DRA. Or maybe the OP isn't the owner of the car, in a state where only the owner can be held liable in such a situation.
Last edited by a moderator: