There is already a temporary injunction issued against DPS on this.
http://www.house.state.tx.us/news/release.php?id=2655
Correct. The trial that I was referring to in my original post stemmed out of that injunction.
There is already a temporary injunction issued against DPS on this.
http://www.house.state.tx.us/news/release.php?id=2655
You are right that it is unconstitutional to create two classes of citizen. However, a much more practical issue is that there is a whole class of US citizen - those who naturalized as minors through their parent's naturalization - that do not necessarily have a certificate of naturalization and certainly don't have a US birth certificate. Therefore, the DPS is currently expecting these people to spend large amounts of money to get a certificate of naturalization before getting a driver's license. Given the large, low-income, Hispanic population in Texas, most of these people are just going to drive without a license instead of spend the extra money.I understand why Texas is asking that (we are all good immigrants but there they have a lot of bad ones and sometimes people's ignorance produces bad reactions).
But they need to understand that they cannot discriminate between US citizen at birth and naturalized citizens, they're all US citizens at the same level (I think it's the 14th amendment).
At that point, just take off US passport from the list and put US birth certificate OR certificate of naturalization, that's it.
If I want to make a fake passport, I could make one with any US city as place of birth, as someone said already.
You are right that it is unconstitutional to create two classes of citizen. However, a much more practical issue is that there is a whole class of US citizen - those who naturalized as minors through their parent's naturalization - that do not necessarily have a certificate of naturalization and certainly don't have a US birth certificate. Therefore, the DPS is currently expecting these people to spend large amounts of money to get a certificate of naturalization before getting a driver's license. Given the large, low-income, Hispanic population in Texas, most of these people are just going to drive without a license instead of spend the extra money.
I understand why Texas is asking that (we are all good immigrants but there they have a lot of bad ones and sometimes people's ignorance produces bad reactions).
But they need to understand that they cannot discriminate between US citizen at birth and naturalized citizens, they're all US citizens at the same level (I think it's the 14th amendment).
At that point, just take off US passport from the list and put US birth certificate OR certificate of naturalization, that's it.
If I want to make a fake passport, I could make one with any US city as place of birth, as someone said already.
I am yet to meet a bad immigrant...anyone knows where I can meet one?
It is not the actual law that is to blame, but rather DPS' interpretation of it, since they are the ones that decided that a US passport is not automatically proof of citizenship. Having said that though, our illustrious governor Rick Perry (should have a 'P' before his first name ) has publicly stated his support for the policy. However, I suspect that is because he doesn't actually have the mental capacity to understand trivial things such as law and the US constitution.
There are people of U.S Nationality but not Citizenship rights.
It's not even Texas, as in the state legislature, but rather the DPS - an administrative agency. This is the basis of the pending law suits, namely that the DPS is acting outside its authority in the interpretation of the state law. Unfortunately, governor (P)Rick Perry, who is as slimy as governors come, is supporting the DPS' stance.I find it odd that Texas thinks they're the ones deciding just what a US passport proves. As far as I know, federal law defines what a US passport is and what it proves and Texas is just being Texas here.
It's not even Texas, as in the state legislature, but rather the DPS - an administrative agency. This is the basis of the pending law suits, namely that the DPS is acting outside its authority in the interpretation of the state law. Unfortunately, governor (P)Rick Perry, who is as slimy as governors come, is supporting the DPS' stance.
That's what I meant; a governor supporting a practice that openly challenges the federal government and its laws. Mind boggling, really.
Correct me if wrong, what is the "Nationality" of those US Nationals who are not Citizens ? I am guessing its "U.S.A".No, those are US Nationals, not people of U.S. Nationality. People of U.S. Nationality are U.S. Citizens only.
It wasn't a Senatorial candidate - it was the one and same Governor (P)Rick Perry - speaking at a rally in support of abolishing federal taxation and the IRS.Considering that we're talking about Texas, I'm not surprised at all. Didn't they recently have a Senatorial candidate who advocated secession from the Union?
Arrogance at its finest...
Correct me if wrong, what is the "Nationality" of those US Nationals who are not Citizens ? I am guessing its "U.S.A".
I double checked my recent passport and on where does it say I am Citizen of U.S . Can anyone provide specific law reference where it says passport is certain proof of U.S Citizenship ?
It wasn't a Senatorial candidate - it was the one and same Governor (P)Rick Perry - speaking at a rally in support of abolishing federal taxation and the IRS.
He is the same guy that earlier this year refused federal grant money to pay unemployment benefit, saying something along the lines that Texan's are real men who will go and find a job rather than take handouts. I'm sure many people who had recently lost their jobs and were struggling to live appreciated this sentiment.
It wasn't a Senatorial candidate - it was the one and same Governor (P)Rick Perry - speaking at a rally in support of abolishing federal taxation and the IRS.
He is the same guy that earlier this year refused federal grant money to pay unemployment benefit, saying something along the lines that Texan's are real men who will go and find a job rather than take handouts. I'm sure many people who had recently lost their jobs and were struggling to live appreciated this sentiment.
I stand corrected. In the typical Bible Belt stereotype, I guess this fine, upstanding gentleman's parents were siblings.
Texas is one of the richest State and definitely one the most fiscally healthy.
I don't like this.
I'm a secular, but I respect somebody who's religious.
Plus, he has been elected in Texas.
You might not like Texas (I don't either) but if you look at the State budget and unemployment, you will find much better numbers than the ultra-liberal California. Like it or not, Texas is one of the richest State and definitely one the most fiscally healthy.
I double checked my recent passport and on where does it say I am Citizen of U.S . Can anyone provide specific law reference where it says passport is certain proof of U.S Citizenship ?
I theorize that consulates are under Department of State, and passport is a document issued by Dept Of State - hence follow same rules. I doubt other agencies and states are obligated unless there is such law.I've tried to search Google for such a law, but the search turns up countless results. The closest I could come up with is the proof of citizenship section of the homepage for U.S. Consulate in Bermuda. The first thing listed is a full validity U.S. Passport. Since consulates are established under direct authority of the Federal government, this should serve as sufficient legal proof.
http://hamilton.usconsulate.gov/proof_of_u.s._citizenship