Meanwhile, the US educational system has made it more difficult for US students pursue a career without having to worry about being in debt for the next 20 years.
Although that has some truth to it Bobsmyth...I have to disagree on it being a bad or negative trait for several reasons:
1) At least the US education system is built on the fact that no one is too old to get an education. I would rather be in such an environment, where I can make up for my 'mistakes' or 'lost opportunities' at any time in life and NOT be held back by a rigid system that shuts doors past a certain age. For example, in the UK if you don't get certain marks on your exams - and I forget which ones - you can't go to university - you have to be satisfied with technical college.
2) Yes you may end up with debt - but which other country can boast giving its citizens the ability to pay their debt over time, and still live in a high standard of living (compared to a majority of the world's nations)? You truly can't beat that!
3) You get rewarded for being smart in the US. Maintaining a certain GPA automatically qualifies you for some grants and bursaries. When I was in college a few years back (for my undergrad), I worked part-time and managed to get almost 80% coverage of my tuition fews through scholarships and grants. Then when I got a full-time job, I still got scholarships (though not as much) for working full time and maintaining good grades. How many nations give its citizens that opportunity?
In my opinion, the debt accrued in higher education is the least of this country's worries when it comes to education. I am much more concerned with the degrading quality of education in middle and high schools due to lack of resources and underpaid/under qualified teachers.
My 2 cents -