Instead of scaring people based on a few rare incidences, providing a balanced view would have had more impact.
I don't have a time now, but I will copy-paste links later (including one specific case from this forum where dismissed speeding ticket led to denial of Citizenship by applicant serving in military, on the grounds of the "lack of good moral character". She assumed it wasn't nece4ssary to disclose - it was dismissed in court, besides it was only a speeding violation, not heavy fine serious traffic violation or DUI/DWI. IO took it as concealment of material fact and not only she got her app. denied but she is banned for the next 5 years as well. There was also CIS and AILA liaison meeting on this subject link to which I will also try to find and post here later ).
Speaking of "scaring people", what is so scary about taking copies of court disposition/proof of payment and disclosing those in the N-400 (if cited prior to applying) and right at the start of interview (if cited while N-400 was pending)?
IO will only appreciate your honesty and , worst come to worst, will postpone the decision in your case until after supervisory review. Of course, an experienced and well versed IO may approve without delay.
Now, compare this to a situation where one unwittingly assumed that they are not to report citations under $400 AND got Citizenship denied BECAUSE OF THAT ( plus 5 years ban).
Which one is better? Why should anyone take a chance and risk being banned for next 5 years from reapplying for Citizenship?
There is nothing scary about getting court disposition and print out of couple of minor, paid off tickets.
It is tragic to get denied and banned for 5 years due to erroneous assumption over something so trivial.