Maybe they are reading this forum and do not want us to know what is happening thereZany_Brainy said:We can do ? to make them reinstate the AVM ?
How can they just suddenly stop it ?
ZB
Maybe they are reading this forum and do not want us to know what is happening thereZany_Brainy said:We can do ? to make them reinstate the AVM ?
How can they just suddenly stop it ?
ZB
jnathan said:Well at least the AVM is working again.
get_gc04 said:Any approvals for RD Feb 26, 2003 ? The AVM is up today but I didn't hear about any new approvals
jack144 said:Hi Guyz:
My case got certified. Here are the details:
RD: 01/22/03
Certified: 08/26/04
I had MS+3yrs when my company applied but my laywer applied as BS+1. Got a 3 letter option, and decided to re-test. My laywer told me that they can't change BS+1yr. So the requirement was still kept BS+1yr but they showed my experience (MS+3yrs) meets BS+1yr requirement.
jpa01 said:is it non-rir application?
mine is jan 29 '03 received non-rir.
jack144 said:Hi Guyz:
My case got certified. Here are the details:
RD: 01/22/03
Certified: 08/26/04
I had MS+3yrs when my company applied but my laywer applied as BS+1. Got a 3 letter option, and decided to re-test. My laywer told me that they can't change BS+1yr. So the requirement was still kept BS+1yr but they showed my experience (MS+3yrs) meets BS+1yr requirement.
Hi Jack144,jack144 said:Hi Guyz:
My case got certified. Here are the details:
RD: 01/22/03
Certified: 08/26/04
I had MS+3yrs when my company applied but my laywer applied as BS+1. Got a 3 letter option, and decided to re-test. My laywer told me that they can't change BS+1yr. So the requirement was still kept BS+1yr but they showed my experience (MS+3yrs) meets BS+1yr requirement.
jnathan said:Congratulations!!!! I'm sure it must be a huge relief! Goodluck for the next stages.
dask_1 said:Hi Jack144,
Congrats for the labor certification.I have few questions ,it would be nice if you could answer these I think will be very helpful for the forum
1)How did your lawyers show more exp for you did they change the ETA 750 A form???
2)Did your lawyers produce any resumes submitted for the job posting while responding to the 3 options letter??
3)Last but not the least how long it took to get the certification
Thanks a lot
Dask_1
Thanks a lot jack 144.All the best for the next stages.jack144 said:Answers to your queries:
1. Ok... BS+1yr was the requirement for the position. They did not change it nor can they change it MS+3yrs in the ETA750. So they kept the requirement for the job same but showed that I meet it since I have MS+3yrs at the time of application.
2. When they advertized, there were NO reponses to the ad for 2 weeks.
3. 1 week after sending the reply to DOL. Overall 1yr and 7months at DOL.
Hope this helps!
get_gc04 said:Any approvals for RD Feb 26, 2003 ? The AVM is up today but I didn't hear about any new approvals
SFDoLRd_082003 said:Hi all,
I recently started reading this forum and am waiting like all of you at the SF DoL level RIR. Found this forum very informative and helpful. I work for a semiconductor company in the bay area.
Some details of my app are:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Regional Office Case# : 0957****
DOTCode# : 999.172-072
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LC RiR Filed @State Workforce (SWA) : 09/16/02
Notice of Assessment Issued by SWA : 08/13/03
Case Forwarded to Dept.of Labor (SF) : 08/25/03
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Good Luck to all of You!
niv said:Hi All,
First time poster, long time reader.
lawyer informed, they got notification to re-test the market.
RD: Feb 25 with -172 dotcode
bayarea, 7% layoff last year with medium size.
Best of luck everybody.
-niv