Greentocitizen
Registered Users (C)
I had my interview today, very nice lady and started to go through the I-400 and when it came arrests she asked me how I got me green card and what was the reason and we went all the milestones in my asylum application and she took notes about the events, dates etc.
My 5 year anniversary is 2 weeks away. She marked decision can not make box and told me that they will mail me the letter (I am hoping to get oath letter but nothing else)
Look at the following questions from the N-400. Please pay attention to how the questions are asked. I am not arguing here what’s wrong and what is right. But the initial assumption any one can make that leads to right or wrong.
Part 10 - B – Question # 8a - Have you ever been a member of or associated with any organization, association, fund, foundation, part, club, society or similar group in the United States or in any other place?
I cannot assume that this only applies in USA. It clearly states “OR IN ANY OTHER PLACE”
But if the same question was phrased like this to begin with
“Have you ever been a member of or associated with any organization, association, fund, foundation, part, club, society or similar group? “
I can assume that this can only applies to events in USA. (I can be wrong or right depending who is interviewing me and how their interpretation at that time is)
Now let’s look at Part 10 – D – Question #16 –
#16 – Have you ever been arrested, cited, or detained by any law enforcement officer (including USCIS or former INS and military officers) for any reason?
Here I can assume (I can be wrong or right depending who is interviewing me and how their interpretation at that time is) this ONLY applies to events in USA
But Instead if it reads/phrased like this
“Have you ever been arrested, cited, or detained by any law enforcement officer (including USCIS or former INS and military officers) for any reason in the United States or in any other place?
I cannot assume that this only applies to events in USA and if I do I claim my self to be stupid.
Besides the reason that you didn't meet the 5 year rule , the officer was clearly asking you how come they give you the green card with all the arrest records that you had before she knows/realizes that it relates to your asylum case. Her interpretation of the #16 is clearly ties to events that happened in the USA. But this interpretation might be different if other IO with a different asylum interview experience comes along.
What do you guys think about the assumptions if the questions are phrased differently?