San Francisco Regional DOL Tracker
- Thread starter usnycus
- Start date
gc_sparrow
Registered Users (C)
Goodbye...
Guys, I have to share one bad news & this is my last post in this forum...I got laid off. After 27 months of labor pending, finally I have to leave that there & go forward with another road. This is a very helpful forum, shit...will miss you all.
bye
Guys, I have to share one bad news & this is my last post in this forum...I got laid off. After 27 months of labor pending, finally I have to leave that there & go forward with another road. This is a very helpful forum, shit...will miss you all.
bye
Anand_Mishra
Registered Users (C)
rp12345 said:
you can get 7th year extension if your labor is filed > 365 days before end of 6th year.
Labor Approved
Got reply to 3 option letter and finally my labor is approved today!!
It has been 4yrs now... the most painful wait ever....
Here are details:
PD: 01/31/02
NOF Issued from SESA
Replied to NOF
RD: 02/24/03
3 Option letter from DOL
Replied to 3 option letter
Labor Approved
DOT Code: 999-151-031
EB3-RIR
Guys please don't give up hope. Best of luck!!
Got reply to 3 option letter and finally my labor is approved today!!
It has been 4yrs now... the most painful wait ever....
Here are details:
PD: 01/31/02
NOF Issued from SESA
Replied to NOF
RD: 02/24/03
3 Option letter from DOL
Replied to 3 option letter
Labor Approved
DOT Code: 999-151-031
EB3-RIR
Guys please don't give up hope. Best of luck!!
i_am_in_trouble
New Member
Priority date with labor substitution URGENT
all,
Last month I applied for 140/485 in SF using labor substitution (with a labor approved in 2000) and was shocked to see FP notice yesterday since it has PD mentioned as Jan 05. I got a second jolt when I called attorney to know that the 485 receipt also has PD of Jam 05.
My attorney had told me (prior to applying) that I will get PD of original labor. I have my own labor pending with PD of Apr 02. I chose to substitute only for the reason to get the PD of 2000. Now I am in deep trouble.
Attorney says that the rule for PD on substitution is unclear and earlier he as seen people getting original labor date as PD for substitution. He feels that after retrogression California USCIS may have become cautious. He tells me that nothing can be done except to wait till PD of 2005 becomes current (another 3-4 years???). He feels that withdrawing the 485 application (and applying later with my labor) will cause more problems.
I am totally let down and feeling depressed. Same with my colleague who applied around same time and has exact same problem. We feel helpless.
Has anyone recently applied for 485 with substitution (in 2005)? If yes can you let me know the PD in receipt/FP notice?
Please take a moment to help me. I don’t know what my options are.
all,
Last month I applied for 140/485 in SF using labor substitution (with a labor approved in 2000) and was shocked to see FP notice yesterday since it has PD mentioned as Jan 05. I got a second jolt when I called attorney to know that the 485 receipt also has PD of Jam 05.
My attorney had told me (prior to applying) that I will get PD of original labor. I have my own labor pending with PD of Apr 02. I chose to substitute only for the reason to get the PD of 2000. Now I am in deep trouble.
Attorney says that the rule for PD on substitution is unclear and earlier he as seen people getting original labor date as PD for substitution. He feels that after retrogression California USCIS may have become cautious. He tells me that nothing can be done except to wait till PD of 2005 becomes current (another 3-4 years???). He feels that withdrawing the 485 application (and applying later with my labor) will cause more problems.
I am totally let down and feeling depressed. Same with my colleague who applied around same time and has exact same problem. We feel helpless.
Has anyone recently applied for 485 with substitution (in 2005)? If yes can you let me know the PD in receipt/FP notice?
Please take a moment to help me. I don’t know what my options are.
Last edited by a moderator:
in_labour_pain
Registered Users (C)
is it?
i_am_in_trouble, did u get to hear from others who faced this situation ...
i thot the pr date is of the old labor ...
i_am_in_trouble, did u get to hear from others who faced this situation ...
i thot the pr date is of the old labor ...
DOL Backlog Processing Center E-Mail Status Inquiry System
02/06/2005: DOL Backlog Processing Center E-Mail Status Inquiry System
Sources indicate that the Backlog Processing Centers have in place the e-mail inquiry system for those cases which have been issued 45-day letters. This inquiry will be available only after 90 days of responding to such 45-day letter. The BPC will respond to such e-mail inquiry in three days.
E-mail inquiry requires (1) the exact employer name; (2) First and Last Name of the Alien Beneficiary; and (3) BPC case number which is printed in the 45-day letters. Any inquiries without these entries or premature inquiries or any other inquiries which are not related to the 45-day letters are likely to be ignored. Readers, please do not send the e-mails unless you meet the foregoing requirements.
The e-mail address for Dallas Backlog Processing Center is: status@daldflc.us
02/06/2005: DOL Backlog Processing Center E-Mail Status Inquiry System
Sources indicate that the Backlog Processing Centers have in place the e-mail inquiry system for those cases which have been issued 45-day letters. This inquiry will be available only after 90 days of responding to such 45-day letter. The BPC will respond to such e-mail inquiry in three days.
E-mail inquiry requires (1) the exact employer name; (2) First and Last Name of the Alien Beneficiary; and (3) BPC case number which is printed in the 45-day letters. Any inquiries without these entries or premature inquiries or any other inquiries which are not related to the 45-day letters are likely to be ignored. Readers, please do not send the e-mails unless you meet the foregoing requirements.
The e-mail address for Dallas Backlog Processing Center is: status@daldflc.us
Remanded Cases
Has anyone in this group received the 45 day letter for the remanded cases ?
My case was remanded to back to state (NON RIR) in June 2003. It was initially filed in RIR and was approved in state. It got remanded from Federal to State in Jun 2003 and I haven't heard anything after that
.
I am sure there are many of you in this forum with a similar fate. If you have received any kind of information regarding these cases, please share it with the rest of us
Has anyone in this group received the 45 day letter for the remanded cases ?
My case was remanded to back to state (NON RIR) in June 2003. It was initially filed in RIR and was approved in state. It got remanded from Federal to State in Jun 2003 and I haven't heard anything after that
.I am sure there are many of you in this forum with a similar fate. If you have received any kind of information regarding these cases, please share it with the rest of us
satyen_2003
Registered Users (C)
rp12345 said:looks like DOL has started working on 3 option letters. Yesterday 3 cases approved from my company (incl me) and today h1forever got approval.
DOL ke ghar mein Der hain Andher nahin
thats a great news, I am also waiting for my 3-option letter reply. Replied back on Nov-12 th.
Waiting_LC_GC
Registered Users (C)
Congrats
Hello,
Could you share complete your case detail information. Does AVM is updated with "certified" message. Basically, How you come to know that your cases are approved. I am also waiting with RD feb 2003.
Thanks and good luck with rest of GC journey.
rp12345 said:
Hello,
Could you share complete your case detail information. Does AVM is updated with "certified" message. Basically, How you come to know that your cases are approved. I am also waiting with RD feb 2003.
Thanks and good luck with rest of GC journey.
Waiting_LC_GC
Registered Users (C)
Congrats
How you come to know that your case is approved. ? I mean through your HR/lawyer ? What AVM is saying ?
h1forever said:
How you come to know that your case is approved. ? I mean through your HR/lawyer ? What AVM is saying ?