San Francisco Regional DOL Tracker - Old (Archived on 09/23/2004)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Guys,

I need some input urgently. My case was filed with no experience(BS+0 years). So, i got the 3 option letter. I did have 4 years of experience at the time of applying for the labor certification. But my HR and lawyers did not apply like that. Now, my HR is saying that if i send my experience letter for those 4 years, they can respond to the 3 option letter saying that i do have experience. Is it something DOL would consider?
I am confused. I cant get any more info from my HR because they are dumb. Can someone tell me once the labor is applied can we change the job requirement...

Thanks



alvin said:
That's exactly what my lawyer told me too, he insisted on keeping the requirements for Bs+2 years else DOL will reject it on the basis of "too restrictive" requirements.

But, I fought against and made it BS + 5 years ( I had 7 years of exp. at that time)

My details are:
PD: 4/10/2002
DOL RD: 03/31/2003
DOT:999.151-032

Guys, any idea when my luck will shine ?
Are they still giving the 3 option letters by lottery ? :mad:

Thanks
al
Click to expand...
 
labor_paines said:
Guys,

I need some input urgently. My case was filed with no experience(BS+0 years). So, i got the 3 option letter. I did have 4 years of experience at the time of applying for the labor certification. But my HR and lawyers did not apply like that. Now, my HR is saying that if i send my experience letter for those 4 years, they can respond to the 3 option letter saying that i do have experience. Is it something DOL would consider?
I am confused. I cant get any more info from my HR because they are dumb. Can someone tell me once the labor is applied can we change the job requirement...

Thanks
Click to expand...

Do you know what was advertised ? I mean was was the experience requirement asked during rectuitment process ? If the position was advertised with BS+0, DOL will not consider your 4 years pf experience. The best answer to three option letter is RETEST THE MARKET.
 
gp111 said:
Do you know what was advertised ? I mean was was the experience requirement asked during rectuitment process ? If the position was advertised with BS+0, DOL will not consider your 4 years pf experience. The best answer to three option letter is RETEST THE MARKET.
Click to expand...
Hi Gp111,
What will be the response (from the candidate's side)for the "retest the market" option.
1)Can the ad be modified stating the reqd. exp needed is 3+ years( considering the fact that the first ad was placed 2.5 yrs ago ) .

2) If some candidate applies for this ad ,will the candidature of the present candidate gets cancelled automatically???

3)Do we need to respond to DOL saying that nobody responded to this ad....and DOL will certify the case???? or some other documentary evidences are required.

Any ideas/suggesstions/links will be of great help.

Thanks for the good work

dask_1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Certify Thoughts

hi..gp111! just wanted to know whats your prediction/thoughts on my case no.#09542465
with dot code# 999.311-012 received @ 01/29/03 when is it to get certified...seems feb 2003 is getting certified..
THANKS :_)
 
dask_1


1)Can the ad be modified stating the reqd. exp needed is 3+ years( considering the fact that the first ad was placed 2.5 yrs ago ) .


*** No You cannot modify the advertisement, if you do, it will be considered a new LC application.


2) If some candidate applies for this ad ,will the candidature of the present candidate gets cancelled automatically???

*** No, Attorney knows how to handle that.


3)Do we need to respond to DOL saying that nobody responded to this ad....and DOL will certify the case???? or some other documentary evidences are required.

*** You have to show the responses received & reasons of disqualifying them.
 
jpa01 said:
hi..gp111! just wanted to know whats your prediction/thoughts on my case no.#09542465
with dot code# 999.311-012 received @ 01/29/03 when is it to get certified...seems feb 2003 is getting certified..
THANKS :_)
Click to expand...

Is that RIR ?
 
gp111 said:
dask_1


1)Can the ad be modified stating the reqd. exp needed is 3+ years( considering the fact that the first ad was placed 2.5 yrs ago ) .


*** No You cannot modify the advertisement, if you do, it will be considered a new LC application.


2) If some candidate applies for this ad ,will the candidature of the present candidate gets cancelled automatically???

*** No, Attorney knows how to handle that.


3)Do we need to respond to DOL saying that nobody responded to this ad....and DOL will certify the case???? or some other documentary evidences are required.

*** You have to show the responses received & reasons of disqualifying them.
Click to expand...
Hi Gp111,
Many thanks for the reply.My case has a dol receipt date of 02/18/2003 and I am sure that I am going to receive the 3 options letter because the ad showed BS+ 2 yrs exp.
I believe my company/lawyer will not cover up any cases.What is the option I have other than filing LC afresh.
 
dask_1 said:
Hi Gp111,
Many thanks for the reply.My case has a dol receipt date of 02/18/2003 and I am sure that I am going to receive the 3 options letter because the ad showed BS+ 2 yrs exp.
I believe my company/lawyer will not cover up any cases.What is the option I have other than filing LC afresh.
Click to expand...

Why do you think you will get 3 Options ?? We have seen many approvals with even BS + 0 also. Company/Lawyer will not cover up any response but the lawyers are paid for getting your LC certified so atleast he will do his job justifying your application !!
 
gp111 said:
Why do you think you will get 3 Options ?? We have seen many approvals with even BS + 0 also. Company/Lawyer will not cover up any response but the lawyers are paid for getting your LC certified so atleast he will do his job justifying your application !!
Click to expand...

Hi Gp111,
The reason Im thinking like this is because one of my colleague who had receipt date of Jan 15 th 2003 got the three option letter his was remande back to state(option chosen by company) and our ad, job profiles match.
Only difference is he did not get any query from the state level I got and it was promptly answered by our lawyers and it got certified through state labor
 
gp111 said:
I thought so, I say you still need to wait for 6 to 8 weeks as DOL is processing Dec 2002 for Non RIR Cases.
Click to expand...

Thanks alot for your time ...gp111!!!!
hope it will get thru ...smoothly.
Guess there is still HOPE..been depressed these past few months cause of this.=(
 
tonysharma said:
FEB 13/14/15/16/17 >>>>>>>>>>>>>there are just 75 cases ,so shd not take long i hope
Click to expand...

I have been a passive reader of this thread. But let me say great job, especially to gp111. I have a question:

How do you know that there are only 75 cases pending in Feb? Do we know how many cases were received by DOL in FEB, MAR, APR (2003) etc?
 
waitingInHope said:
I have been a passive reader of this thread. But let me say great job, especially to gp111. I have a question:

How do you know that there are only 75 cases pending in Feb? Do we know how many cases were received by DOL in FEB, MAR, APR (2003) etc?
Click to expand...

I think I have posted these numbers couple of times before also.. here you go again

Month RIR Cases
Feb 1460
Mar 1419
Apr 1075
May 1310
Jun 1272
Jul 1194

Remaining Feb 2003 Cases
2/14/2003 26
2/17/2003 4
2/18/2003 90
2/19/2003 122
2/20/2003 39
2/24/2003 98
2/25/2003 96
2/26/2003 83
2/27/2003 17
2/28/2003 165


RD Feb 14, 2003 Certified : 09547784, 803, 808, 815...
 
RD : Feb 14, 2003

09547803 : 999.113-021 Certified Aug 16, 2004
09547805 : 999.172-051 Certified Aug 16, 2004
09547806 : 999.151-031 Certified Aug 16, 2004
09547808 : 999.151-032 Certified Aug 16, 2004
09547811 : 999.112-021 Certified Aug 16, 2004
 
waitingInHope said:
I have been a passive reader of this thread. But let me say great job, especially to gp111. I have a question:

How do you know that there are only 75 cases pending in Feb? Do we know how many cases were received by DOL in FEB, MAR, APR (2003) etc?
Click to expand...
there are appox. 75 case between feb 13 to feb 17
 
gp111 said:
I think I have posted these numbers couple of times before also.. here you go again

Month RIR Cases
Feb 1460
Mar 1419
Apr 1075
May 1310
Jun 1272
Jul 1194

Remaining Feb 2003 Cases
2/14/2003 26
2/17/2003 4
2/18/2003 90
2/19/2003 122
2/20/2003 39
2/24/2003 98
2/25/2003 96
2/26/2003 83
2/27/2003 17
2/28/2003 165


RD Feb 14, 2003 Certified : 09547784, 803, 808, 815...
Click to expand...
GP111,
If my case number is not quoted in these mails, does it mean that it is most likely
remanded back to state or I probably got the 3-option letter etc? I am having
a hard time getting the status via AVM. My RD is 02/11/03 but my case number
is not one of the case numbers quoted in this thread.
On pins and needles....
 
For those who intrested in DOT code:999-151-051 received date at DOL Feb,10,2003

09547385 Received in regional office
09547154 Certified
09546693 Certified
09547172 Received in regional office
09547081 Certified
09547217 Received in regional office
09547232 Received in regional office
09547128 Received in regional office
09547260 Certified
09547059 Certified
09546713 Certified
09547056 Received in regional office
09547255 Certified
09547256 Certified
09547063 Received in regional office
09546983 Received in regional office
09547109 Received in regional office
 
risudoch said:
GP111,
If my case number is not quoted in these mails, does it mean that it is most likely
remanded back to state or I probably got the 3-option letter etc? I am having
a hard time getting the status via AVM. My RD is 02/11/03 but my case number
is not one of the case numbers quoted in this thread.
On pins and needles....
Click to expand...

No.. The Cases Numbers above are random checks, those are not the only cases approved. I have seen some cases are taking little bit longer then the others ( may be different officers !).. so just wait for few more days as you will get good news soon..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top