yes, this issue is pretty obvious, in past years EU had no enough selecties to get equal visas , but tis year it has.The first obvious objection is that none of this is different to before so why should the outcome be?
did you agree with idea , that 12500 cut off for EU has more real applicants then 18000 cut of for AF?But also there is faulty logic in your last sentence - as the countries with lower cut-offs in AF are those with the high rejection rates, so the success rate of the remainder (or what you call real winners) will be higher, not lower.
if yes , please note that among AF first 18k case numbers there are lot of people from countries which have special low cut-off, so from the number of real applicants in 18000 AF we must minus this persons too.
what is wrong now if i say that EU with 12,5cut has much more interviews then AF with its 18k cut-off?
Last edited by a moderator: