Hi Ahad,
I wish I could tell you I am wrong. In practice at the interview
I-134 were requested from people who have an annual income less than
125% of FPG. Recently it happened at the zapatos' interview in New York.
One of the reasons that 100.000 people win Diversity Visa Lottery annually
but only around 55.000 gets the visas is this. They do not give cards to people
they think might become a public charge. (Section 212 (a)(4) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act)
I myself for instance despite having more than annual income over
FPL will go to my interview with an I-134 form just in case.
Since I will do a follow-to-join for my family that live overseas
timing is very important for me.
Saying all these; if you have no means of getting an I-134
go to your interview without one. If they demand it at the interview
you'll worry about it later. Hopefully you'll get a good IO and
they won't mention it. But if they do do not take it personal.
In practice a lot of people were asked I-134 in the past.
At the and of the day if you think you did what you could,
you can pray and relax. But if you think you can do more,
just do it...
Thank you capeolive. I appreciate your good wishes and your willingness to help us all succeed.
I looked at the link you gave about 125% requirement and it is addressed to consular sections, not USCIS field offices.
I know those who are doing it through consular processing are required to provide proof of financial support, but I did not read anywhere that explicitly states such requirement for AOS filers (as lottery winners).
Moreover, I think they HAD the right to demand such proof from me before they sent me the interview letter. I do not think anyone has the right to demand something that is not required and/or asked in writing with prior notice. I will bring whatever that is required from me in the interview letter and I will complain if they will ask something that they did not explicitly ask me with prior notice.
IOs, good or bad, must act within certain rules and guidelines and they do not have the authority to demand something that is outside of their authority. All of these interviews are recorded and the probability of abusing one's position and authority is very low.