perm_faq said:extension from 5/1/06 to 3/11/07 (6 year period ) --> Allowed
extension from 5/1/06 to 3/11/08 (6 year period + 1 year due to pending 1-140) --> Is not Allowed. Here is why?
You should have your LC pending for more than 365 days OR
Your LC approved, but I140 is still pending before you reach 6 year limit.
If your I140 is approved, but 485 is pending, then 3 year extension can be filed before 6 months of your max 6 year limit.
Hope that helps!
rajrw said:Congrats Daloon !!
Updated the excel sheet. Good to see 2 approvals and 1 RFE after a loooooooooong time.
Sanatima, L1A24, J20022005, Sanliergun
Can you please check the status and update if their is any change.
Thanks,
Raj.
Endeavour2003 said:Hi perm_faq
Thanks a lot for the clarification.
Earlier I was under the impression that to get a 7'th year extension your LC should be filed at least 365 days ago, irrespective of whether your LC was approved or not. That would have meant that people who got approved in PERM but had applied LC less than 365 days ago would be disqualified from applying the 7'th year extension.
I was thinking of applying for a backup PERM ( Just in case Murphy's law came true during I-140 ). Maybe I can hold off for now as my 6 year period is about 15 months away. As PERM takes roughly 6 months at most I think I should be good even if I apply the PERM 6 months later when I would still have 9 months left on my 6 year period. Let me know if I am making a mistake here.
arbit007 said:if you consider eb-2 , dates havent changed for i140 since october mid 2005.
At that point it was july 29, today its still july 29
Looks like these guys are permanently on vacation.
I suggest that if nothing happens by end of january, all CSC victims come forward to solve I140 Issues with CSC.
At high level
1) retrogression is already in for 485 (COmmunity is fghting back to solve this)
2) Labor certification backlog reduction mess (SFO dol original victims , victims at Philly, Dallas and CA swa, i feel sorry for you guys)
3)Another fight FOR I-140 wont really hurt )
Regards
Arbit
CA PD AUG 2002
(CA dol victim)
Current CSC & retrogression victim
arbit007 said:3)Another fight FOR I-140 wont really hurt )
arbit007 said:GCcard_dream
If retrogression is removed and your pd gets current, you can file 485
Only thing thats needed is i140 receipt notice (not i140 approval)
This is referred to as "semi concurrent " filing
To be really independent of employer you need i140 approved
Of course there are memos out which say, you can use ac21 once 180 days pass even without i140 approval, but thats too risky and untested.
GCard_Dream said:Hi arbit007,
In my opinion, retrogression is far more important issue that I-140 processing time. If it wasn't for retrogression, lot of us would be able to do concurrent filing of I140 & I485 and despite the processing time we would still be able to get our EAD and be employer independent after 180 days of filing, isn't that true?
But since retrogression is the current reality, faster I-140 wouldn't help much although we could get 3 year extension on our H1-B as opposed to 1 year. My 2 cents.
gc_12345 said:Had a LUD in the morning without any message. But tonight, it is approved. Also received the email with approval information. Updated the signature.