CSC August 2005 Filing I-140 Tracking

Hi db9,

What documents did you take with you - original or copy of I-485 receipt?
Did you call 800 number and took an appointment?
If yes, did you have a confirmation number for the appointment?
Did you go on the appointment date?

What did ASC ask for before proceeding with FP?

Thanks,
fan123
 
db9 said:
Got my Biometrics and finger printing done today based on the I-485 receipt at the San Jose ASC. I did not have an FP notice. They were great! Very courteous. No problems at all. The I-485 LUD changed as well.

They were courteous!! Wow - that's a new one ! FP based on 485 receipt - was that code 1 or 3?! I think I should call them again - maybe the confusion is resolved.

Kindly respond ASAP
 
GCpossible said:
Originally Posted by tantan
gp111, GCpossible, any word/LUD on your 140s?

My 140: RD: 08/01 based on USPS
RD: 08/04 on the receipt
ND: 08/05
LUD: 08/12 no message change

..

Nothing heared yet for my case. Hope will soon.

God knows which lazy ass officer is in charge of my 140 who hasn't got to it!
I am going crazy...
 
tantan said:
God knows which lazy ass officer is in charge of my 140 who hasn't got to it!
I am going crazy...

I hope you get it soon.
I asked sometime ago that is there any dependency between processing I-140 and namecheck being cleared as I has read about this before but nobody answered.
At least sometime ago, there were a few posts that I-140 won't be approvd until namecheck is done and there were some debates on that. Does anyone have any update on this matter?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dude_frm_foaks said:
There is no dependency between I140 and namecheck . so dont worry you will be fine have patience.

Thanks,

I'm not worried as my I-140 is approved. It is not good to say this but if there were any correlation, I'd be in a better shape!!

Just wanted to be clearer about the process.
 
My AP is approved. EAD Still waiting

Good News. Mine and my wife's AP is approved yesterday. Still waiting on EAD.

I-140/I-485/EAD/AP : ND: 09/21/2005

AP: LUD : 10/21/2005 (Email) :)
EAD : Still waiting : :mad:
 
Processing Time

Hi All,
I am trying to understand the difference between California Center level processing time versus individual district level processing time for I-485 and I-765.
More specific, Sacramento District Vs California Center processing time. How it works? Does anyone have any idea.

Thanks,
 
Waiting_LC_GC said:
Hi All,
I am trying to understand the difference between California Center level processing time versus individual district level processing time for I-485 and I-765.
More specific, Sacramento District Vs California Center processing time. How it works? Does anyone have any idea.

Thanks,

The district office does not process all the I-485 / 765 applications. It only process applications those are forwarded to them by Service Center for further Processing. (i.e. Interview required etc.)
 
Thanks

gp111 said:
The district office does not process all the I-485 / 765 applications. It only process applications those are forwarded to them by Service Center for further Processing. (i.e. Interview required etc.)

Thank you so much.

One more quicky q's, On my RD for 485/765/131 it says September 27,2005 But when i check online status on www.uscis.gov link it says Sepotember 30,2005. Why it differ as well as which one is the correct one.
 
Waiting_LC_GC said:
Thank you so much.

One more quicky q's, On my RD for 485/765/131 it says September 27,2005 But when i check online status on www.uscis.gov link it says Sepotember 30,2005. Why it differ as well as which one is the correct one.

What the website says its your ND (Notice Date)..
 
Good Info On Retrogression (From Visa Bulletin)

EMPLOYMENT PREFERENCE VISA AVAILABILITY

The backlog reduction efforts of both Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Department of Labor continue to result in very heavy demand for Employment-based numbers. The amount of cases currently being processed is sufficient to use all available numbers in many categories. The level of demand in the Employment categories is expected to be far in excess of the annual limits, and once established, cut-off date movements are likely to be slow.

WHAT CAUSES THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CUT-OFF DATES?

The Visa Office subdivides the annual preference and foreign state limitations specified in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) into twelve monthly allotments. The totals of documentarily qualified applicants that have been reported to VO are compared each month with the numbers available for the next regular allotment and numbers are allocated to reported applicants in order of their priority dates, the oldest dates first.

If there are sufficient numbers in a particular category to satisfy all reported documentarily qualified demand, the category is considered “Current.” For example, if the Employment Third preference monthly target is 5,000 and there are only 3,000 applicants, the category is considered “Current”.
Whenever the total of documentarily qualified applicants in a category exceeds the supply of numbers available for allotment for the particular month, the category is considered to be “oversubscribed” and a visa availability cut-off date is established. The cut-off date is the priority date of the first documentarily qualified applicant who could not be accommodated for a visa number. For example, if the Employment Third preference monthly target is 5,000 and there are 15,000 applicants, a cut-off date would be established so that only 5,000 numbers would be used, and the cut-off date would be the priority date of the 5,001st applicant.

WILL THERE BE CUT-OFF DATES FOR ANY ADDITIONAL FOREIGN STATES IN THE FIRST AND SECOND PREFERENCE CATEGORIES?

It may be necessary to establish a cut-off date for the “All Chargeability Areas” Second preference category at some point during the second half of the fiscal year. It is too early to estimate whether future demand will warrant such action. As of October 1st, cut-off dates for the First and Second preferences for China and India were established due to heavy demand; cut-off date movement is expected to be limited until a demand pattern has been determined.

WHY ARE THERE CUT-OFF DATES THIS YEAR AS OPPOSED TO PREVIOUS YEARS, WHEN THE CATEGORIES WERE CURRENT?

While the Employment categories had been “Current” for almost four years, several important factors affected the decision to implement cut-offs for FY-2006.

Prior to July 2001, demand for Employment numbers was such that cut-off dates were in effect for many categories, and that is the case once again for FY-2006.

The reasons the Employment categories had become current were:

The American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act (AC21) recaptured a “pool” of 131,000 Employment numbers unused in fiscal years 1999 and 2000, and allowed those recaptured numbers to be used by the oversubscribed countries, and The substantial decline in demand for numbers for adjustment of status cases prevented the annual limits from being reached for several years.

In FY-2006, we are faced with continuing heavy demand due to the DHS and DOL backlog reduction efforts, along with an Employment limit which is approximately 40% lower than that of FY-2005. The lower annual Employment limit is a result of the virtual elimination of the “pool” of recaptured AC21 numbers, returning us to the pre-July 2001 situation.

WHAT ABOUT SCHEDULE A NUMBERS?

The 50,000 Schedule A numbers will provide relief to many Employment preference applicants, since any Schedule A applicant whose priority date is beyond the relevant Employment preference cut-off date can be processed and charged against the 50,000 limit. It is expected that Schedule A numbers will be available on a “Current” basis throughout all of FY-2006.

HOW IS THE EMPLOYMENT-BASED PER-COUNTRY LIMIT CALCULATED?


Section 201 of the INA sets an annual minimum Family-sponsored preference limit of 226,000, while the worldwide annual level for Employment-based preference immigrants is at least 140,000. Section 202 sets the per-country limit for preference immigrants at 7% of the total annual Family-sponsored and Employment-based preference limits, i.e. a minimum of 25,620.

The annual per-country limitation of 7% is a cap, meaning visa issuances to any single country may not exceed this figure. This limitation is not a quota to which any particular country is entitled, however. The per-country limitation serves to avoid monopolization of virtually all the visa numbers by applicants from only a few countries.
The AC21 removed the per-country limit in any calendar quarter in which overall applicant demand for Employment-based visa numbers is less than the total of such numbers available.
In recent years, the application of the rules outlined in AC21 has allowed countries such as China – mainland born, India, and the Philippines to utilize large amounts of employment numbers which would have otherwise gone unused.
During FY-2006, due to anticipated heavy demand, the AC21 provisions are not expected to apply, and the amount of Employment numbers available to any single country will be subject to the 7% cap. It is anticipated that the addition of unused FY-2005 Family numbers and the remaining AC21 numbers to the 140,000 annual minimum will result in an FY-2006 annual Employment limit of 152,000. This will mean an Employment per-country limit for FY-2006 of approximately 10,650.
To illustrate the effect of the reduced per-county limitation during FY-2006 on the oversubscribed countries, it should be noted that during FY-2005 India used approximately 47,175 Employment numbers
 
Great Info GP111

Thanks for the consolidated information GP111.
How fast do you think will the dates move for India after the latest decisons?

Thanks!
 
Thanks again.

gp111 said:
What the website says its your ND (Notice Date)..
First time i checked my status today. Thanks for the good information. So, I am safe against Oct 1,2005 dateline. Correct !!!

I already got my FP schedule 19th Nov,2005 next month.
 
EAD,AP both come to home Address?

Hi,
I have a question regarding EAD & AP. I know that EAD comes to home address. I am not sure about AP. Can you please let me know it comes to home address?
 
cavenkat said:
Hi,
I have a question regarding EAD & AP. I know that EAD comes to home address. I am not sure about AP. Can you please let me know it comes to home address?

the same for AP but takes a few more days
 
Waiting_LC_GC said:
First time i checked my status today. Thanks for the good information. So, I am safe against Oct 1,2005 dateline. Correct !!!

I already got my FP schedule 19th Nov,2005 next month.

Dude.. you got your Receipt & FP Schedule & still you are asking me this ??
 
Sorry

gp111 said:
Dude.. you got your Receipt & FP Schedule & still you are asking me this ??
GP111,
I hope you are not upset. After 3 1/2 year and drametically LC got approved. I am still trying to come out of that stress. You are wonderfull source of information.
Thanks for your very good information in this forum.
 
Top