Dear johanyoyiDear Binafana
ur says ur interview day is April 27. and April 27 is Sunday how come it is come to u by april 27 u have to correct it b/c the embassy is not working in Sunday
it's typing error my interview is april 29 i will correct it
Dear johanyoyiDear Binafana
ur says ur interview day is April 27. and April 27 is Sunday how come it is come to u by april 27 u have to correct it b/c the embassy is not working in Sunday
Hello everyone :
Just to update you,i almost finish collecting all documents & authentication stuffs.my medical check up also took place in IOM & it was a matter of 2 days to check up .z first day for lab & x-ray & the second day for physical check up.based on it they(IOM) gave me an appointment to pick up cofirmation before 5 days from interview.generally almost everything seems good but i have one question plz.
Before 5 yrs i had another name and all my documents except university document are by my former name then i changed that name by court in 2008 GC and now i have court paper.the problem is, i didnt mention (indicate) unconsciously my former name in DS 230 form .does it has a problem during interview as far as i have a court paper?what shall i do?
Thank u in advance!
Hi dear forumites
this time i just received my second notification letter from KCC
Hello everyone :
Just to update you,i almost finish collecting all documents & authentication stuffs.my medical check up also took place in IOM & it was a matter of 2 days to check up .z first day for lab & x-ray & the second day for physical check up.based on it they(IOM) gave me an appointment to pick up cofirmation before 5 days from interview.generally almost everything seems good but i have one question plz.
Before 5 yrs i had another name and all my documents except university document are by my former name then i changed that name by court in 2008 GC and now i have court paper.the problem is, i didnt mention (indicate) unconsciously my former name in DS 230 form .does it has a problem during interview as far as i have a court paper?what shall i do?
Thank u in advance!
Yes, you should have indicated the previous name(s) on your forms under the section that says other names used. This is rather important.
Not disclosing the names may be viewed as if you're trying to hide something. The background checks they carry out is done using all the names you provide. I don't know what your CN is but if you haven't been scheduled for an interview at the moment, you should send updated forms, with the former names listed right away.
Oh I just realized that your interview is in a few days. Hm...in that case, I don't think there's anything KCC can do. Maybe you can email the embassy? Or else, maybe take an updated copy of DS230 to the interview and try to explain to the officer what happened before you sign the form.
Maybe others will have better suggestions.
Dear Sm1smom, he no more uses the name. That place on the DS form is, i think, for other names still being used not for names changed by court.
In addition to what sm1smom said, I think you should also see if you can get a police report that indicates you have no record under your previous name as well. It only takes 2 days max to do that, so if your interview is not on Monday or Tuesday, I think it's worth it.
hi tew:Yes it's with fingerprints so they should find any record under any name. However I was just thinking of how he can prove that he didn't conceal his name intentionally. It probably is unnecessary
It's possible for a person to have committed some sort of crime under a previous name, then go ahead and legally change to a new name. That's the reason they want to know all the names an applicant has used in the past or is still using. The background check, like I wrote earlier, will be done with ALL the names, both past/old and new! Not disclosing previously used names could be viewed as immigration fraud.
In Aby's case, not much can be done at this stage since the interview is in a couple of days from what I understand. So just go for the interview and declare the
Am still not convinced much with the reasoning ( am convinced that he should have indicated though). We all know that if a person had done crime or not ( even the background check)will be known with the finger print, not name. And he has disclosed by bringing the court paper along other documents.
This will be a big learning case for all of us. I stick with the person who advised you to go along the documents and tell them all the truth.