You sound young. Did you immigrate as a child? IF yes, did a parent naturalize before you turned 18? If yes, you may be a USC already and all the rest is pointless worry.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2012-20799.pdf
The State Department is seeking comments on the CRBA. It will be published in the Federal Register on 8/23/12 and comments will be accepted for 60 days.
After it is published, you may submit comments by any of the...
You are better off waiting and filing everything together. Doing things piecemeal is always going to provide an opportunity for unwanted processing delays in the long run.
You must be a USC in order to file for a parent and that makes her an immediate relative (IR) of a USC. Even if she...
Since you lived here for ~18 years your baby will easily be a USC at birth and it won't be hard to prove it.
From what you said above, unless your wife has a reentry permit, she will have trouble if she has been outside the U.S. for over a year! That point is unclear. Also, your reason for...
It looks like you just barely missed out of derivative citizenship. The change in the law became effective Feb 27, 2001, at which time IF you had at least one naturalized parent and were under 18, you would likely have become a USC automatically, I think you just missed it.
It would appear...
An I-130 by the USC stepparent is fastest possibility.
Read the I-864 instructions very carefully and pay attention to "domicile" requirements and exceptions. See an attorney if needed.
USCIS (note INS ceased to exist in March 2003) will look at your naturalization eligibility primarily for the 5 years prior to the N-400 filing date.
USCIS would always have problems with fraud in obtaining your greencard BUT you don't have that problem because of how you got your status via...
Not all applications are in systems that can interface with case status online. This is one of them. It is not something that you can do anything about.
It would shed some light on the truth if he would explain what transpired, step-by-step, from the time of departure in 2005. However, I don't think that he ever will provide a sufficiently detailed explanation.
Also, he stated at one point that he was dealing through the "best immigration...
INA 317 allows LPR missionaries and other "clergy" to travel abroad for extended periods and it does not mean that they lose LPR status.
INA 316(b) allows qualified LPRs to go abroad for extended periods for qualifying employment purposes and not lose LPR status.
Military members often go...
You have provided insufficient information to get a meaningful response.
There may be certain obscure reasons and legal provisions at work in this case which make it OK.
-OR-
There may have been some fraud that has not been caught yet.
1. This post looks odd. It looks like it was cut and pasted and probably posted in many forums.
2. The situation described is VERY OBVIOUS and it looks like a troll post.
3. That said, the situation described (if true) begs for USCIS to investigate for marriage fraud which would negate...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.