Agreed with franko. Both Sloner and raevsky were making their predictions and we hardly can judge them for this. Sloner at least stopped making his predictions and just insulting raevsky every once in a while, but nobody taking his posts seriously anyway. What I don't like is that raevsky (after a few incorrect predictions) is still stressing everyone out saying that interviews will be cancelled in July or August. There's definitely no way to know such kind of information for sure because of many outside factors involved. I am not denying that it's still possible, but I think that everyone who have their interview scheduled in July or August should act accordingly. Don't listen to raevsky. Prepare your documents, pass medicals and wait for the interview.
I personally think what raevsky is doing is far worse. I know that Sloner has been criticized for some exuberant optimism, yet raevsky persistently talking about interview cancellations in July/August without any substantiation and putting a max CN of 1,550 on SA, after 1,750 just became current for July is rather irrresponsible, indeed.
ahahaha
I think Raevskii writes with psychiatric hospital.
I believe that with the cutoff published for SA and EU SA will probably get out of visas in August and EU most likely will get out of visas no late than in August (July possible too).
Hehe. Akh speaks the truth:
. U nego agenda. Inymi slovami, on zainteresovan v tom chtoby bol'she klientov indiiskogo foruma podavali na vizy. Rajivu idet s etogo zarplata - s kajdogo novogo klienta. A Rajiv platit britsimonu za ego full-time contribution na forume. Britsimon sidit gde-to v Indii i za groshi kropaet vse eti teksty, ugovarivai vseh podriad podavat' dokumenty v KCC
It basically says that Rajiv is paying you pennies for convincing people to send docks to KCC.
Hehhehe. Not only reavsky is a soulless machine sent here from the future to destroy DV lottery winners hope but he is also a freakin paranoid machine
This is awesome
ahahaha
I have seen pictures of Simon with San Francisco
Britsimon's strategy is to follow DOS's decisions (in terms of cutoff). He partially supported my early calculations of EU borderline 35K-37K by changing it slightly to 38K-39K. Then he found a good argument that convinced me that is case 55000 visas are issued, the cutoff could really go up to 38700 (my calcs based on his idea). However, he did not stay with the numbers he predicted, he followed the strategy "DOS does not make mistakes". That is his main argument. We all know it does make misakes.Fair enough
That's what will simon would say on that post as well
Simom has gone through all kind of silly remarks !
But we all know that he's the most accurate, in term of predictions.
And he's the one that went a dig deep for the Nacara input, where now even Raevsky is adding up on his calculations...
http://forums.immigration.com/threads/nacara-nigaragua.318699/
Hundreds of professionals and job hunters visit my linked In page weekly, a number of them tries to contact me rather frequently.
There are dozens of other invitations weekly. Sorry, not easy to figure out who of them Britsimon is.
You did not say that explicitly. However, you easily "forget" of your previous opinion when DOS's logic is not following it.
I can insure you that simon has always said DOS and KCC are bunch of idiots !
I am not so sure. It could be not Rajiv, it could be Monica Agrawal who implements this plan. He might not even know, but he probably knows. That is not the point who specifically does it. That was a message on unrelated forum - that is why I just made a simple suggestion. The point is different - pay is likely to be involved. Of course, I could be mistaken. For instance, it could be a bunch of India law students - that could be a good practice for them to contribute in the US immigration forum, for a small fee. They follow the logic of judicial precedent, they study certain things very well. But more fundamental math/science logic is not their way of thinking. I am not saying Britsimon is the only one. That is like an internship for them. And not a big loss for administration of the forum financially, even for one person like Monica. That is why the forum is very conservative in supporting views about early quota fulfilling, and very liberal in opposite views.
