Processing time for green card based on asylum

A

Again and again another false info from you! USCIS can reopen your asylum case even if you got from an immigration judge and refuse the judge decision by appealing at the BIA court! An immigration judge can’t force the USCIS to issue a green card for anyone
Well I did myself so you don't have to tell me smart guy,damn I never se bad people like you . What a hell if you don't like don't comment on my site.
 
Well I did myself so you don't have to tell me smart guy,damn I never se bad people like you . What a hell if you don't like don't comment on my site.
Bad people like me cause I’m correcting your wrong info? You’re spreading a lot of wrong info here please watch out your words as i been talking to you respectfully but you have a looooot of wrong info that ain’t true at all
 
Bad people like me cause I’m correcting your wrong info? You’re spreading a lot of wrong info here please watch out your words as i been talking to you respectfully but you have a looooot of wrong info that ain’t true
Omg immigration court I mean BIA they give me the damn green card right,how the hell spreading false information.
 
I am sharing this response from USCIS LosAngles Asylum office if it can be helpful for any one in my situation, (I hope no one gets in my situation) after my field office interview my file was sent out of my State to California LosAngles Asylum office.
After i485 interview and waiting for over 2½ years this is the response for my congressional inquiry.

The purpose of this forum in my opinion is to share with each other to be helpful to all.
Let's all of us stay united in these difficult times.

From: XXXXX

Good Afternoon,

Thank you for your inquiry on behalf of your constituent Mr. XXXXX. I do apologize for the delay in response. For clarification, the Los Angeles Asylum Office does not and will not physically adjudicate the I-485

Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status. The Los Angeles Asylum Office currently has this file as it is pending a Post-Asylum Eligibility Review. This means the case is under extended review. Extended post-interview asylum case processing is generally attributable to the particular circumstances and/or the unique eligibility issues raised by an applicant’s individual case. Cases that often require additional, post-interview processing time include those where applicants have not yet cleared all required background and security checks, adjudications that require quality assurance review, and adjudications that require the input of other U.S. governmental entities. While we do strive to issue final decisions within 60 days of the interview, it is at times not possible for us to do so due to factors outside of our control.

Once we have completed our review, we will send back file to the office that will complete the adjudication of the I-485. Unfortunately we do not an exact time frame as to when that review will be completed. If we need any additional information from the constituent we will reach out to them by mail.

Thank you,

Congressional Liaison Specialist

Los Angeles Asylum Office (ZLA)

Refugee, Asylum, and International Operations

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Department of Homeland Security
 
I am sharing this response from USCIS LosAngles Asylum office if it can be helpful for any one in my situation, (I hope no one gets in my situation) after my field office interview my file was sent out of my State to California LosAngles Asylum office.
After i485 interview and waiting for over 2½ years this is the response for my congressional inquiry.

The purpose of this forum in my opinion is to share with each other to be helpful to all.
Let's all of us stay united in these difficult times.

From: XXXXX

Good Afternoon,

Thank you for your inquiry on behalf of your constituent Mr. XXXXX. I do apologize for the delay in response. For clarification, the Los Angeles Asylum Office does not and will not physically adjudicate the I-485

Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status. The Los Angeles Asylum Office currently has this file as it is pending a Post-Asylum Eligibility Review. This means the case is under extended review. Extended post-interview asylum case processing is generally attributable to the particular circumstances and/or the unique eligibility issues raised by an applicant’s individual case. Cases that often require additional, post-interview processing time include those where applicants have not yet cleared all required background and security checks, adjudications that require quality assurance review, and adjudications that require the input of other U.S. governmental entities. While we do strive to issue final decisions within 60 days of the interview, it is at times not possible for us to do so due to factors outside of our control.

Once we have completed our review, we will send back file to the office that will complete the adjudication of the I-485. Unfortunately we do not an exact time frame as to when that review will be completed. If we need any additional information from the constituent we will reach out to them by mail.

Thank you,

Congressional Liaison Specialist

Los Angeles Asylum Office (ZLA)

Refugee, Asylum, and International Operations

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Department of Homeland Security
Hopefully you get good news soon!!!
 
Does this USCIS congressional response look like a good news or bad news in your opinion.
Honestly it doesn’t mean anything bad or good it’s just you need to wait for the outcome of Los Angeles asylum office but again I believe you need to contact a high skilled attorney
 
Does this USCIS congressional response look like a good news or bad news in your opinion.

The answer is somewhat vague and doesn't quite address the response and specificity needed as it relates to your current matter. Especially when you want to concretely get some idea of an answer that would be specifically tailored to the specific circumstances of your given situation.
The answer refers to approximately 60 days after the i-485 interview. If I understand correctly, you waited quite a long time after the interview, more than 60 days passed.

Your only way out is to file a writ of Mandamus with your district court, otherwise you would be at the mercy of USCIS and the asylum office for an unpredictable waiting game. How much more waiting? Nobody can predict.
 
Does this USCIS congressional response look like a good news or bad news in your opinion.
It is generally saying that your asylum file is still at the asylum office for post-interview review or quality assurance. And because your asylum file is yet to be forwarded to USCIS, USCIS has to put your I-485 on hold even though they are ready to process. The adjudication cannot be made with incomplete information. USCIS did not delay your case, but your asylum office!
 
It is generally saying that your asylum file is still at the asylum office for post-interview review or quality assurance. And because your asylum file is yet to be forwarded to USCIS, USCIS has to put your I-485 on hold even though they are ready to process. The adjudication cannot be made with incomplete information. USCIS did not delay your case, but your asylum office!
Just so you know my asylum was approved in 1998, I then filed for i485 in 1999 and they put my case on hold based on 212a3b (wrongly) this is after i485 interview in my local service center that they sent it to LosAngles Asylum office for Post-Asylum Eligibility Review. Why did USCIS sent my case to asylum office after so many years?
 
The answer is somewhat vague and doesn't quite address the response and specificity needed as it relates to your current matter. Especially when you want to concretely get some idea of an answer that would be specifically tailored to the specific circumstances of your given situation.
The answer refers to approximately 60 days after the i-485 interview. If I understand correctly, you waited quite a long time after the interview, more than 60 days passed.

Your only way out is to file a writ of Mandamus with your district court, otherwise you would be at the mercy of USCIS and the asylum office for an unpredictable waiting game. How much more waiting? Nobody can predict.
This is a very good suggestion for normal delays but my unfortunate circumstance is the 212a3b based hold case where with incomplete background USCIS can deny after mandamus judgement under national security threat, again I want to clarify USCIS connected me with a group I have nothing to do with and I told the immigration officer during my i485 interview and she may have realized the mistake after I showed my papers.
 
Just so you know my asylum was approved in 1998, I then filed for i485 in 1999 and they put my case on hold based on 212a3b (wrongly) this is after i485 interview in my local service center that they sent it to LosAngles Asylum office for Post-Asylum Eligibility Review. Why did USCIS sent my case to asylum office after so many years?
I am sorry to hear that you have to wait this long for the decision. On the USCIS website, asylees are encouraged to apply for LPR, but no language guarantees those who apply will be able to become LPRs. The adjudication process of asylum-based I-485s considers your asylum case as well as all other criteria. The interviewer might have seen/heard inconsistent information in your asylum file and might request the asylum office to further investigate or confirm your asylum case; hence, your file was sent back from USCIS to the asylum office.

If you sued USCIS, I think they would ask the asylum office to expedite the investigation/confirmation (as the congressional liaison referred to as post-interview review/QA) so that they can adjudicate your I-485 application. You should let a good lawyer handle it. Good luck!
 
I told the immigration officer during my i485 interview and she may have realized the mistake after I showed my papers.
That could be the key information as to why your asylum file was sent back to the asylum office. Your asylum officer who interviewed you may write something related the groups you were connected to. Of course, USCIS has to play it safe and get all information straightened out by the asylum office before adjudicating your I-485 application. After all, the information was tied to terrorism, even by mistake, and no one wanted to get their hands on the case.
 
I am sorry to hear that you have to wait this long for the decision. On the USCIS website, asylees are encouraged to apply for LPR, but no language guarantees those who apply will be able to become LPRs. The adjudication process of asylum-based I-485s considers your asylum case as well as all other criteria. The interviewer might have seen/heard inconsistent information in your asylum file and might request the asylum office to further investigate or confirm your asylum case; hence, your file was sent back from USCIS to the asylum office.

If you sued USCIS, I think they would ask the asylum office to expedite the investigation/confirmation (as the congressional liaison referred to as post-interview review/QA) so that they can adjudicate your I-485 application. You should let a good lawyer handle it. Good luck!
I agree with you my answers were inconsistent obviously after 28 years and moving forward from depressing past days that you put behind to move forward.
 
That could be the key information as to why your asylum file was sent back to the asylum office. Your asylum officer who interviewed you may write something related the groups you were connected to. Of course, USCIS has to play it safe and get all information straightened out by the asylum office before adjudicating your I-485 application. After all, the information was tied to terrorism, even by mistake, and no one wanted to get their hands on the case.
I hope that is right, thank you.
 
How do you know it was put on hold due to trig? Did some official tell you this or you are assuming?
FOIA in 2009 after 3rd medical and then my i485 interview after 4th medical, and also during my i485 interview the interviewer asked me regarding trig. I also told the interviewer that I was connected with a group that has nothing to do with me, but still she sent my case to Los Angeles asylum office for review.
She also asked me about some petty incidences that I mentioned in my asylum interview in 1998 some were answered correctly and some I could not recollect after 23 years.
 
Top