Sonibago, what is fairness? Though the computer erroneously selected some people, I think they should still be given the chance to proceed. It is important that we all recognized that it was not their fault; they did not cheat the system, they did not manipulate the computer, they did absolutely nothing to be selected. Because of this error any decision taken by DOS can not be completely fair. There two possible options: keep the initial winners and redraw the rest or run a new lottery for all applicants. Both options is unfair. It will be unfair to the initial winners if a new lottery is run because they did absolutely nothing wrong and did not take advantage of the other applicants or the system to win. It will also be unfair to those who did not win because the computer erred. The question now become how can the degree of unfairness be reduced in both instances?
If the first option is taken, those who did not win have another chance to be selected. If the second option is taken, those who did not win still have another chance to be selected. But there is everything for the initial winners to lose if the second option is taken because some or all of them might win again or some or all of them might not win again. Based on this, I am of the opinion that the initial winners must be given to chance to proceed.
I'm going to ask you some questions too:
What is fairness?
What did the losers do? did they cheat the system, did they manipulate the computer?
What did DOS do to overcome the degree of unfairness in both groups?
Is keeping the 22000 erroneous winners as winners breaking the law?
Is putting everybody back in the pool and re-drawing breaking the law?
Is picking 78000 out of 14 million the same probability as picking 90000 out of how many applied on 5th and 6th?
Is the probability of 100000 out of 14 million the same whether drawn on May 1 or July 15?
I look forward to your answers.