New York SESA Tracker

Status
Not open for further replies.
I called avm,It couldn't locate my case with phone number. I donot have federal case number. but i do have state case id. Can anyone please advice me,whether i can search with my stateID.
thank you
 
Re: Moves to Regional

That make all sense, nice catch.

The main issue now is the delay on the regional level. the queue is growing there and no approval had been issued for these cases.

Originally posted by JustWatching
Hi all,

I scanned a few pages of this thread and noticed something (maybe everyone has already figured this one out, so sorry I may be a little slow...)


NY SWA sends cases to regional in batches.

- If you look back there were at least 2 cases sent to Regional on March 5th.

- Then nothing (I think...)

- There were also multiple cases sent to Regional on March 24th.

So my guess is that cases don't flow one by one to Regional which may explain some the inconsistencies in progress.
 
NY DOL is working Jan 2004 cases

I took a look at the NJ tracker.

It seems like NY DOL is done with the cases received in the first-half of January 2004 have been proccesed and are working on the second half of January 2004.
 
Hi JustWatching ,

May be we can estimate how long it will take regional office to finish these case, Do you know from your review to the NJ threads , how long it took NY DOL to process first have of Jan ?
 
Guesstimates

Originally posted by ahalem
Hi JustWatching ,

May be we can estimate how long it will take regional office to finish these case, Do you know from your review to the NJ threads , how long it took NY DOL to process first have of Jan ?


Not enough data to figure that out. All I can say is that it is taking between 50-80 days to process cases at NY DOL.

I did a similar analysis a few months back when processing was taking between 25-70 days so overall it seems like processing time is increasing.

I think this may be due to a higher volume of cases being sent from NY SWA than before.

At 50-80 day processing time, I would estimate (guess, take a stab in the dark, don't hold me to it, and any other disclaimer that you can think of...) the following:

May 2001 cases - Approved by 3rd week of April.
June 2001 cases - Approved by 2nd week of May.
July 2001 cases - Approved by 2nd week of June.
August 2001 cases - Approved by 2nd week of June.

I also have suspicions that July 2001 and August 2001 cases are being processed in parallel at NY SWA (hence similar approval date estimates).

FINAL NOTE: As I have said these are only guesses, you can disagree or not. I have no more information than any of you out there.
 
Hi Justwatching,
You seem to have done some very GOOD research ..thanks for that.

I was wondering do you have any similar stats as to when you feel NY SWA would be processing cases filed in Feb'02.

I know there is still ways to go as based on the current information, it is processing Aug'01, but still something to look forward too.

Thanks
 
update my details on the spreadsheet

Hi Guys,

I'm not sure if this is good news but my lawyer just called me and let me know that NY has asked for some more information on my application

my application was sent on Aug 31st

could someone please put my details on the spreadsheet, I once tried but couldn't figure out how to do it
 
FOLKS

I think NY state is processing on different category basis like EB1, EB2,EB3. As I understand EB1 has more priority than EB2
though both are filed on the same day. Correct me if I am wrong.

nyc1999
Do you know your category like EB1, EB2, EB3 ?

Thanks
 
Originally posted by waitingforgc04
Hi Justwatching,
You seem to have done some very GOOD research ..thanks for that.

I was wondering do you have any similar stats as to when you feel NY SWA would be processing cases filed in Feb'02.

I know there is still ways to go as based on the current information, it is processing Aug'01, but still something to look forward too.

Thanks


I wish I did. I think I already made some pretty big assumptions...but here you go for your entertainment...

remaining of 2001 cases - end of August 2004

add a month or so for every month after that...

This also assumes that backlog reduction centers have not kicked in.
 
Originally posted by IND77
FOLKS

I think NY state is processing on different category basis like EB1, EB2,EB3. As I understand EB1 has more priority than EB2
though both are filed on the same day. Correct me if I am wrong.

nyc1999
Do you know your category like EB1, EB2, EB3 ?

Thanks

The concept of EBx does not exist until you get to I-140.

There seems to be a difference at labor certification level, professional vs. skilled workers...but I have never been able to find anything that defines this - other than the obvious differences.

I believe NY SWA and NY DOL are required to process based on priority date and giving priority to RIR cases over traditional cases.
 
justwatching..

clear my doubt please,
as per you say that RIR and EBx categories are at both NY SESA,Regional and 140 stage.
then how about those 245(1) cases.those guys also went thru RIR
then is it onace again we have problem in 140/485 stage??

please clear my doubt
 
Originally posted by verant123
justwatching..

clear my doubt please,
as per you say that RIR and EBx categories are at both NY SESA,Regional and 140 stage.
then how about those 245(1) cases.those guys also went thru RIR
then is it onace again we have problem in 140/485 stage??

please clear my doubt

EBx categories do NOT exist in labor certification stage.

245(i) cases could file through RIR or traditional - no different than our cases.

245(i) cases in I-140 stage will then get put into EB-2 or EB-3, no EB-1 because they don't even require labor certs.

Is it likely that most 245(i) cases are EB-3? Probably, but there is no reason why they could not be EB-2s.

Once 245(i) cases reach I-140 or I-485 stage the cases are no different than non-245(i) cases.

Remember 245(i) cases are simply people that were out of status, not necessarily illegal immigrants in the sense that they came into the country illegally but people that may have come in legally and then their visas expired.
 
Originally posted by verant123
justwatching..

clear my doubt please,
as per you say that RIR and EBx categories are at both NY SESA,Regional and 140 stage.
then how about those 245(1) cases.those guys also went thru RIR
then is it onace again we have problem in 140/485 stage??

please clear my doubt

I can see you are confused. Labor (including RIR and non RIR) is handled by DOL while I140 is handled by BCSIS (former INS). Labor need to go through state (NY SESA) level and regional level (NY DOL).

245i is just a bill to allow people with illegal immigration status to potentially adjust their status. If they can find an employer to sponsor them, they can file a LCA too. In NY, most 245i people filed their labor under RIR category.

Hope this will help a little bit.
 
I called the 212-621-9330 for any updated news and the voice mail still from Feb 2004 , they still processing June 2001 offically
 
Excellent article. But 18 months... they are kidding, right? -- they could not imagine what it really is (as you all know 36 month and still counting for LC only)...

Anyway, it looks like a result of someone of us sending this to NYT. Kudos to whomever did that!

-Q.
 
Copy of NYTimes article

Gabriella A. Barschdorff, a vice president for strategic investment at J. P. Morgan Chase in New York, is not exactly the huddled-masses type. But one rainy day last week, shortly before 7 a.m., she joined the long, bedraggled line of immigrants standing outside 26 Federal Plaza in downtown Manhattan. There she took the spot held for her by a young man she had hired to camp out in his sleeping bag.

It was all part of a last-ditch bid to get her formal travel document, a paper that, as a legal foreign worker with a pending green card application, she badly needed. If she failed, she would miss a business meeting in London. If she went without the permit, she risked being barred from coming back to America.

Ms. Barschdorff, who is Swedish, is one of thousands of skilled foreign professionals working legally in the United States who find themselves virtual prisoners of a ballooning immigration-services backlog. In the last year, the mostly routine paperwork they need to work and travel has slowed to a crawl.

Processing times — for everything from renewing an annual work permit to securing permanent legal residency — have as much as quadrupled over the last 18 months, despite the Bush administration's pledge to cut waiting times in half. The wait to replace a lost green card, for instance, has grown to 19 months from four. And the kind of paperwork sought by Ms. Barschdorff — a document allowing her to re-enter the country after a brief trip — now takes seven months instead of two.

As a consequence, and despite an infusion of $160 million earmarked for cutting the backlog, the number of pending applications has risen by nearly 60 percent over the last three years, to 6.2 million, according to a recent congressional report. The root cause, officials say, is the post-9/11 reassignment of 1,000 agents who used to issue documents and now do extensive security checks of every applicant instead.

The fallout ranges from minor inconveniences to wrenching dilemmas.

There is Christopher B. Murray, for example, the manager of nano-scale research for I.B.M., who had to decide whether to rush to his mother's side when his father died in Nova Scotia last week, or battle for an emergency travel document to replace the one that he had applied to renew last year. And there is William Powell, an American journalist for Fortune magazine, and his Chinese wife, Joyce Cui, who spent most of her pregnancy agonizing over whether she should go back to Beijing to give birth near her family. Because she had applied for a green card, she risked being barred from the United States if she left before her travel documents came through; if she stayed, she risked going into labor alone in New York when he was reassigned to China.

"The delays in processing some of these cases have clearly been as a result of moving so many of our employees, especially in the service centers, into security checks," said William R. Yates, associate director of operations for Citizenship and Immigration Services, in Homeland Security. "We don't apologize. We have identified a number of persons who represented a threat to the United States."

But he added, "Everything else has suffered, unfortunately."

Mr. Yates reiterated the commitment to cut the backlog by the end of September 2006. But there is little optimism among many international businesses and institutions struggling with the problem on behalf of 700,000 U.S.-based foreign employees.

The new obstacles and delays, business leaders say, are already hurting their ability to recruit and keep the best talent worldwide.

"There are key people who are unable to work, unable to close the gaps in their status," said Mr. Murray, adding that his recruitment of foreign researchers at Harvard and M.I.T. had been damaged. "There are family impacts. But if you want to be very cold about it, it puts the U.S. at a serious disadvantage."

One reason the backlog has ballooned is that processing delays force employers to file costly multiple petitions just to keep an employee and dependents in legal status, complained Lynn Shotwell, director of the American Council on International Personnel, a Washington organization for 250 corporations and institutions that want to ease the movement of personnel across national borders.

The council has protested a Bush administration plan to impose higher processing fees to cover the cost of hiring additional personnel.

One of the regional immigration offices most beset with delays is the Vermont Service Center, which handles applications from New York and other Northeastern states. Mr. Yates, the homeland security official, said the office, in St. Albans, stopped issuing travel documents for several months this winter because it ran out of security paper with the department's new logo.

The overflow spilled into district offices like 26 Federal Plaza. In theory, after waiting 90 days for a work permit to be renewed by mail, for example, an applicant is entitled to have one issued in person, the same day. But in practice, no more than 100 such permits are given out daily.

Such problems played out last week when Ms. Barschdorff, 33, passed through the metal detectors at 26 Federal Plaza. She wanted to renew her annual work permit and to get the document that would let her travel safely to London and back to her 1-year-old American daughter.

For her, the last best hope was the young man with the sleeping bag, Kendo McDonald. Mr. McDonald, 28, has worked for a decade as a trusted "runner," shepherding documents and now clients for the international immigration law firm of Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy. He has his own measure of how much worse the backlog grew in the last year.

"Before I didn't have to do this 3 o'clock in the morning thing," he said, rainwater still dripping from his jacket. "I could come at 8 a.m."

After vetting Ms. Barschdorff's documents, and those of two other clients, Mr. McDonald guided them into the netherworld of federal bureaucracy. Ms. Barschdorff would spend the next nine and a half hours there, in a labyrinth of lines and waiting rooms.

The two other clients asked that their names not be published, worried that publicity could hurt their pending green card applications. One was a 33-year-old computer scientist at I.B.M. who left India eight years ago to earn a doctorate at the State University of New York at Stonybrook. He said he had risen at 3 a.m. to make it from his home in Mohegan Lake, where his wife and 5-month-old U.S.-born daughter were sleeping. The other man described himself as a "denim consultant" who was born in Zimbabwe but had lived for years in London before moving to New York six years ago to work for the fashion designer Calvin Klein.

Together with Ms. Barschdorff, who previously worked at the European Parliament in Brussels and has degrees from Columbia and the London School of Economics, the trio almost typified the mobility of an international class of go-getters whose cosmopolitan careers help make New York a global hub of finance, science and design. Both men were being sponsored for green cards by employers as "aliens of extraordinary ability" — a phrase "that makes people think of E.T.," Ms. Barschdorff joked. But without the work permit renewals they needed, they could be left without a paycheck.

Mr. McDonald warned Ms. Barschdorff that her goal of renewing two documents at once might be impossible. The waiting room for one was on the eighth floor, the other on the ninth.

There are plans for every waiting room to adopt a number system like the one used by busy New York delis, Mr. McDonald said, but for now, after turning in papers to one of the window agents, applicants just have to wait until they are summoned by name. The typical wait is four to six hours, he said. And if Ms. Barschdorff ran up and down between waiting rooms, she would risk missing one or both calls.

It was Mr. McDonald who helped her manage the juggling act, and smooth the way when her paperwork seemed deficient. J. P. Morgan was paying $1,500 for the law firm's work to renew Ms. Barschdorff's employment authorization card alone, she said.

Many in the room were fending for themselves. The line that snaked through the ninth-floor waiting room included a Polish construction worker, a Nigerian nurse, and a turbaned chef from India. Only the chef, Manjit Singh, 42, would give his name after explaining that his boss was sponsoring him because of his skill at making curry for a restaurant on Union Turnpike in Queens.

Some were turned away, but after nearly 10 hours, Ms. Barschdorff emerged triumphant. She had gained both the right to travel and another year's work authorization. Her two companions had their work permits, too. Mr. McDonald was headed back to Queens for a few hours' sleep before doing it all over again.

"Even though I absolutely despise this bureaucracy," Ms. Barschdorff said, "at the end of the day you can come to America"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top