- Home
- Forums
- Immigrant Visas (Green Cards)
- I-140 Issues
- I-140 Archives
- I-140 Times Tracker
- Tracker, I-140, California Service Center
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
I-140 scan (Project kashmir related small project)
- Thread starter kenboo
- Start date
I140helppls
Registered Users (C)
re: kenboo
Kenboo. I saw at the nebraska service center forum that they post approvals each day ( and there were plenty ). Just led me to think could we do something here at CSC . Does any case get approved in the day .it doesnt seem like from your scanning .if you can send me the instructions on how to get just the approvals for a day i could do that .
Kenboo. I saw at the nebraska service center forum that they post approvals each day ( and there were plenty ). Just led me to think could we do something here at CSC . Does any case get approved in the day .it doesnt seem like from your scanning .if you can send me the instructions on how to get just the approvals for a day i could do that .
I140helppls
Hi. My scanning tools are not automated therefore 1 scan/week is what I can contribute to this forum. At CSC, there're very few approvals even in a week. I don't think the daily report is beneficial, and I'm not really interested to setup automated tools that I-485 CSC folks created(project anaconda etc) Anyway some people are desperate....
In order to generate the daily report, someone (or a group of people) has to scan everyday. I don't know how NSC forum guys are doing that. It's possible to use their scanners but my resource(IP address) is limited.
Nonetheless I can give you all the I-140 case numbers that I used to scan if you can make daily reports or you'd take over what I am doing every week. Please let me know
-kenboo
Hi. My scanning tools are not automated therefore 1 scan/week is what I can contribute to this forum. At CSC, there're very few approvals even in a week. I don't think the daily report is beneficial, and I'm not really interested to setup automated tools that I-485 CSC folks created(project anaconda etc) Anyway some people are desperate....
In order to generate the daily report, someone (or a group of people) has to scan everyday. I don't know how NSC forum guys are doing that. It's possible to use their scanners but my resource(IP address) is limited.
Nonetheless I can give you all the I-140 case numbers that I used to scan if you can make daily reports or you'd take over what I am doing every week. Please let me know
-kenboo
Originally posted by I140helppls
Kenboo. I saw at the nebraska service center forum that they post approvals each day ( and there were plenty ). Just led me to think could we do something here at CSC . Does any case get approved in the day .it doesnt seem like from your scanning .if you can send me the instructions on how to get just the approvals for a day i could do that .
I140helppls
Registered Users (C)
re:
Kenboo.
I wanted to know whether we have any approvals or not in a day. If you say there are none then i agree there is no point in scanning .With regards to me taking over what u are doing , I can definitely try .... Pls send me the detailed steps of how to do it and then i can let u know whether i can do it .i have a laptop at home .also let me know how to get multiple IP's
Kenboo.
I wanted to know whether we have any approvals or not in a day. If you say there are none then i agree there is no point in scanning .With regards to me taking over what u are doing , I can definitely try .... Pls send me the detailed steps of how to do it and then i can let u know whether i can do it .i have a laptop at home .also let me know how to get multiple IP's
Originally posted by gcpend
Thanks for your comments
My AP got approved on Sep 28th
My EAD got approved on Aug 18th
This is my first RFE
My company has about 8 employees.
Hi gcpend,
I guess the company size might be the reason they are asking for
more info. If your employer and lawyer could provide whatever
they have asked I guess you should be ok. I have read on this
california 140 forum somebody with company size as low as 4
employee getting approved.
By the way thanks for the reply.
To know whether we have any approvals in a day is essentially the same to daily scanning. I know you don't need detailed report though.
There were only 2 approvals in the last report, so you'll get 'none' for the half of the week.
Please let me know your email address. I will send the Excel file.
The steps is easy. Just open Macro menu and run 'scan' macro.
There're less than 2000 cases scanned per report. Only 2 IPs are required to complete. thanks.
kenboo
There were only 2 approvals in the last report, so you'll get 'none' for the half of the week.
Please let me know your email address. I will send the Excel file.
The steps is easy. Just open Macro menu and run 'scan' macro.
There're less than 2000 cases scanned per report. Only 2 IPs are required to complete. thanks.
kenboo
Originally posted by I140helppls
Kenboo.
I wanted to know whether we have any approvals or not in a day. If you say there are none then i agree there is no point in scanning .With regards to me taking over what u are doing , I can definitely try .... Pls send me the detailed steps of how to do it and then i can let u know whether i can do it .i have a laptop at home .also let me know how to get multiple IP's
Last edited by a moderator:
I140helppls
Registered Users (C)
re:
I just spoke to the customer service at BCIS and she says.
1. have u done a status check on ur case my RD is 30-may-2003.
2. i said no
3. she says ok i am going to do it and then after 2 mins she says 'oh we already did one 2 weeks ago when u had called '
any idea what she is talking abt because i was unable to understand anything she was saying ....
also one more thing 'do we need to change our address on i140 petition if we moved'
I just spoke to the customer service at BCIS and she says.
1. have u done a status check on ur case my RD is 30-may-2003.
2. i said no
3. she says ok i am going to do it and then after 2 mins she says 'oh we already did one 2 weeks ago when u had called '
any idea what she is talking abt because i was unable to understand anything she was saying ....
also one more thing 'do we need to change our address on i140 petition if we moved'
Originally posted by kenboo
askgc
I don't remember but did we report number of employees at the time of I-140 filing? How does USCIS know the applicant's company status before RFE? (sounds like a newbie's question..hehe)
I guess yes, I will check my papers and let you know tommorrow.
I for sure know my lawyer has asked for number of employees.
kenboo & askgc,
Thanks for your input.
I guess USCIS does not know how many employees does a company have before issuing RFE.
And I suspect whether the RFE details got changed in 2004
Your comments are most welcome and thank you all. We can check this if one more guy posts his comments from his RFE issued in 2004 esp Feb 2004 and onwards
Kenboo, how many employees are there with your employer?
Thanks for your input.
I guess USCIS does not know how many employees does a company have before issuing RFE.
And I suspect whether the RFE details got changed in 2004
Your comments are most welcome and thank you all. We can check this if one more guy posts his comments from his RFE issued in 2004 esp Feb 2004 and onwards
Kenboo, how many employees are there with your employer?
Originally posted by gcpend
kenboo & askgc,
Thanks for your input.
I guess USCIS does not know how many employees does a company have before issuing RFE.
And I suspect whether the RFE details got changed in 2004
Your comments are most welcome and thank you all. We can check this if one more guy posts his comments from his RFE issued in 2004 esp Feb 2004 and onwards
Kenboo, how many employees are there with your employer?
Hi gcpend & Kenboo,
I have checked I 140 form and it contains the number of
employee in Part 5 question 2. So USCIS knows the number of employee.
Vote now or forget your 485 for years.
Please vote now or else all the effort put by Rajiv and this community is going to be waste as the number of votes is
very less.
Eligibility to vote :-
1.) Any body with 485 pending, one can vote for dependents too.
All concurrent filers please vote I understand your current problem is 140 but what about next stage dont you want it
to be better.
http://boards.immigration.com/anthesys/TrackerPetition/signatoryForm.php?petId=4
Please vote now or else all the effort put by Rajiv and this community is going to be waste as the number of votes is
very less.
Eligibility to vote :-
1.) Any body with 485 pending, one can vote for dependents too.
All concurrent filers please vote I understand your current problem is 140 but what about next stage dont you want it
to be better.
http://boards.immigration.com/anthesys/TrackerPetition/signatoryForm.php?petId=4
hi askgc & gcpend
thanks for checking the application form.
So they do know number of employees,
and probably issue RFE based on the information.
my company has 10+ people including executives.
3 citizen, 5 gc holder, 3 H1B.
The gc holders obtained GC through the company.
kenboo
thanks for checking the application form.
So they do know number of employees,
and probably issue RFE based on the information.
my company has 10+ people including executives.
3 citizen, 5 gc holder, 3 H1B.
The gc holders obtained GC through the company.
kenboo
As of Feb 17
Code:
WAC#(scans/tched%) -- Aprvd Dend/Wthd Misc RFErecvd RFEsent Recvd
WAC03001( 50/ 98%) -- 28( 56%) 2( 4%) 3( 6%) 14( 28%) 2( 4%) 1( 2%)
WAC03002( 42/ 90%) -- 27( 64%) 2( 4%) 3( 7%) 6( 14%) 0( 0%) 4( 9%)
WAC03003( 60/ 96%) -- 40( 66%) 0( 0%) 6( 10%) 11( 18%) 1( 1%) 2( 3%)
WAC03010( 32/ 96%) -- 15( 46%) 1( 3%) 0( 0%) 9( 28%) 6( 18%) 1( 3%)
WAC03021( 38/ 97%) -- 25( 65%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 11( 28%) 1( 2%) 1( 2%)
WAC03040( 33/ 93%) -- 21( 63%) 0( 0%) 1( 3%) 7( 21%) 2( 6%) 2( 6%)
WAC03052(102/ 85%) -- 44( 43%) 1( 1%) 1( 1%) 31( 30%) 10( 9%) 15( 14%)
WAC03060( 88/ 86%) -- 37( 42%) 11( 12%) 0( 0%) 21( 23%) 7( 7%) 12( 13%)
WAC03082( 67/ 82%) -- 26( 38%) 1( 1%) 7( 10%) 18( 26%) 3( 4%) 12( 17%)
WAC03089( 75/ 85%) -- 36( 48%) 2( 2%) 1( 1%) 18( 24%) 7( 9%) 11( 14%)
WAC03095( 56/ 80%) -- 25( 44%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 17( 30%) 3( 5%) 11( 19%)
WAC03108( 5/100%) -- 4( 80%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 1( 20%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%)
WAC03120( 59/ 79%) -- 25( 42%) 3( 5%) 1( 1%) 13( 22%) 5( 8%) 12( 20%)
WAC03125( 74/ 77%) -- 31( 41%) 0( 0%) 5( 6%) 13( 17%) 8( 10%) 17( 22%)
WAC03134( 3/100%) -- 1( 33%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 1( 33%) 1( 33%) 0( 0%)
WAC03136( 7/ 85%) -- 2( 28%) 0( 0%) 1( 14%) 2( 28%) 1( 14%) 1( 14%)
WAC03140( 56/ 73%) -- 20( 35%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 12( 21%) 9( 16%) 15( 26%)
WAC03145( 41/ 53%) -- 10( 24%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 7( 17%) 5( 12%) 19( 46%)
WAC03150( 49/ 61%) -- 15( 30%) 1( 2%) 1( 2%) 9( 18%) 4( 8%) 19( 38%)
WAC03155( 56/ 57%) -- 14( 25%) 0( 0%) 1( 1%) 13( 23%) 4( 7%) 24( 42%)
WAC03157( 21/ 71%) -- 8( 38%) 2( 9%) 0( 0%) 2( 9%) 3( 14%) 6( 28%)
WAC03158( 44/ 61%) -- 12( 27%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 9( 20%) 6( 13%) 17( 38%)
WAC03160( 62/ 54%) -- 11( 17%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 12( 19%) 11( 17%) 28( 45%)
WAC03165( 57/ 35%) -- 4( 7%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 3( 5%) 13( 22%) 37( 64%)
WAC03169( 44/ 29%) -- 1( 2%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 1( 2%) 11( 25%) 31( 70%)
WAC03170( 41/ 24%) -- 4( 9%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 2( 4%) 4( 9%) 31( 75%)
WAC03180( 46/ 34%) -- 4( 8%) 2( 4%) 1( 2%) 4( 8%) 5( 10%) 30( 65%)
WAC03181( 51/ 19%) -- 5( 9%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 2( 3%) 3( 5%) 41( 80%)
WAC03190( 44/ 18%) -- 5( 11%) 1( 2%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 2( 4%) 36( 81%)
WAC03215( 59/ 8%) -- 1( 1%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 2( 3%) 2( 3%) 54( 91%)
WAC03218( 30/ 6%) -- 1( 3%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 1( 3%) 28( 93%)
WAC03236( 9/ 33%) -- 2( 22%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 1( 11%) 6( 66%)
WAC03238( 43/ 25%) -- 1( 2%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 4( 9%) 6( 13%) 32( 74%)
WAC03248( 20/ 20%) -- 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 2( 10%) 2( 10%) 16( 80%)< Feb 9
> Feb 17
> Feb 17
Code:
WAC#(scans/tched%) -- Aprvd Dend/Wthd Misc RFErecvd RFEsent Recvd
< WAC03003( 60/ 95%) -- 40( 66%) 0( 0%) 5( 8%) 11( 18%) 1( 1%) 3( 5%)
> WAC03003( 60/ 96%) -- 40( 66%) 0( 0%) 6( 10%) 11( 18%) 1( 1%) 2( 3%)
< WAC03052(102/ 86%) -- 44( 43%) 1( 1%) 2( 1%) 30( 29%) 11( 10%) 14( 13%)
> WAC03052(102/ 85%) -- 44( 43%) 1( 1%) 1( 1%) 31( 30%) 10( 9%) 15( 14%)
< WAC03095( 56/ 80%) -- 24( 42%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 18( 32%) 3( 5%) 11( 19%)
> WAC03095( 56/ 80%) -- 25( 44%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 17( 30%) 3( 5%) 11( 19%)
< WAC03125( 74/ 74%) -- 30( 40%) 0( 0%) 4( 5%) 14( 18%) 7( 9%) 19( 25%)
> WAC03125( 74/ 77%) -- 31( 41%) 0( 0%) 5( 6%) 13( 17%) 8( 10%) 17( 22%)
< WAC03140( 56/ 73%) -- 20( 35%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 11( 19%) 10( 17%) 15( 26%)
> WAC03140( 56/ 73%) -- 20( 35%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 12( 21%) 9( 16%) 15( 26%)
< WAC03158( 44/ 61%) -- 12( 27%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 8( 18%) 7( 15%) 17( 38%)
> WAC03158( 44/ 61%) -- 12( 27%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 9( 20%) 6( 13%) 17( 38%)
< WAC03160( 62/ 54%) -- 11( 17%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 11( 17%) 12( 19%) 28( 45%)
> WAC03160( 62/ 54%) -- 11( 17%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 12( 19%) 11( 17%) 28( 45%)
> WAC03169( 44/ 29%) -- 1( 2%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 1( 2%) 11( 25%) 31( 70%)
< WAC03169( 44/ 29%) -- 1( 2%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 12( 27%) 31( 70%)
< WAC03170( 41/ 19%) -- 4( 9%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 2( 4%) 2( 4%) 33( 80%)
> WAC03170( 41/ 24%) -- 4( 9%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 2( 4%) 4( 9%) 31( 75%)
< WAC03180( 46/ 34%) -- 4( 8%) 2( 4%) 1( 2%) 3( 6%) 6( 13%) 30( 65%)
> WAC03180( 46/ 34%) -- 4( 8%) 2( 4%) 1( 2%) 4( 8%) 5( 10%) 30( 65%)
< WAC03236( 6/ 33%) -- 1( 16%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 1( 16%) 4( 66%)
> WAC03236( 9/ 33%) -- 2( 22%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 1( 11%) 6( 66%)
< WAC03238( 43/ 25%) -- 1( 2%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 3( 6%) 7( 16%) 32( 74%)
> WAC03238( 43/ 25%) -- 1( 2%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 4( 9%) 6( 13%) 32( 74%)
< WAC03248( 20/ 20%) -- 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 1( 5%) 3( 15%) 16( 80%)
> WAC03248( 20/ 20%) -- 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 0( 0%) 2( 10%) 2( 10%) 16( 80%)I140helppls
Registered Users (C)
re:
from kenboo's scan it doesnt seem like I140 cases are being worked at . any comments
from kenboo's scan it doesnt seem like I140 cases are being worked at . any comments
H1B cap reached
Looks like H1B Cap reached. Now once these H1B pending
applications are cleared (dont know how long) hope they may
take up 140.
http://www.shusterman.com/pdf/h1bcap-21704.pdf
I have read in some 485 threads that USCIS have moved
officers from 140 to H1B PP and they will be back to 140
processing after H1B cap reaches.
Looks like H1B Cap reached. Now once these H1B pending
applications are cleared (dont know how long) hope they may
take up 140.
http://www.shusterman.com/pdf/h1bcap-21704.pdf
I have read in some 485 threads that USCIS have moved
officers from 140 to H1B PP and they will be back to 140
processing after H1B cap reaches.
immportuser
Registered Users (C)
yep..
Its in the paper today...H1-B cap is reached. hopefully they'll allocate some resources to i140 now.
this is so frustrating...
Its in the paper today...H1-B cap is reached. hopefully they'll allocate some resources to i140 now.
this is so frustrating...
I think it may take few more weeks to move H1b offices into I140 production unit. yesterday they said that H1b cap reached, that does not mean all the H1 applications have been processed, so we may have to wait another 2 or 3 weeks to see some actibity in I140.
lets hope for the best.
there is posting regarding moving H1b officers to I140 in
Http://www.immigration-law.com
(breaking news posted on 01/12/04)
thanks,
VCB
lets hope for the best.
there is posting regarding moving H1b officers to I140 in
Http://www.immigration-law.com
(breaking news posted on 01/12/04)
thanks,
VCB