Is there a "REAL" requirement to maintain a GC in terms of time spent outside?
Maybe this question is for a new thread but new threads don't seem to get much lukewarm reception these days, so I thought of asking here. I guess as GC holders we have less involvement with the forum than H1-B/Retrogressed candidates.
Quite a few websites (usvisalaw.com, uscis.gov) seem to indicate that as a LPR if you are traveling outside the US for less than one year, you do not need a Re-entry Permit. For travels outside for more than one year and less than two, you definitely need a RP.
What does this really mean? If you plan to be away for ten months, are you okay using just your GC to return? Tied to that issue is how many months must you live in the US before you can travel overseas again? This travel could be for personal, family emergency or exploring of opportunities abroad.
If you also know for certain that you DO NOT plan to ever become a US Citizen, are you then still required to be in the US for six months of the year?
I agree that standard requirements of maintaining ties to the US, keeping bank accounts, assests etc. still holds true for all LPRs, but I'm really interested in knowing if the six month US/six months overseas requirement holds true if you DO NOT plan on becoming a US Citizen ever.
And yes, ppl have different reasons for living in the US or leaving it after obtaining their GCs which may or may not make sense to an H1-B who is waiting patiently in the queue, but that's how it is.
Thoughts? Jack, triplecitizen, etc?