JustWatching
Registered Users (C)
antonioa77 said:icarus informed us with different information around first of march. DOl doesn't know what to do yet.
With all due respect to ICARUS but don't you think Bill Carlson would be a more reliable source?
antonioa77 said:icarus informed us with different information around first of march. DOl doesn't know what to do yet.
JustWatching said:The original count for the entire San Francisco region of 245i cases was 62,000, That was 3 years ago. I doubt there are still 50,000 left.
well whatever are the number for 2001, the problem is that around 2/3 of the total backlog(>300k) is in the non rir cases. therefore ,if there r 2 queues but synchronised it means that RIR people r messed up big time because most(average) RIR are with priority dates mid 2003, except few states like new york , indiana and arkansas.JustWatching said:With all due respect to ICARUS but don't you think Bill Carlson would be a more reliable source?
antonioa77 said:well whatever are the number for 2001, the problem is that around 2/3 of the total backlog(>300k) is in the non rir cases. therefore ,if there r 2 queues but synchronised it means that RIR people r messed up big time because most(average) RIR are with priority dates mid 2003, except few states like new york , indiana and arkansas.
i have few questions:mnhrdc said:What it means is if the resources are shared for RIR and TR all RIR cases may be finished in just few months, so for eg. they will allowcate say 80 for TR and 20 for RIR so both will progress simultaneously.
They dont mean they stop RIR and process only NON-RIR untill they reach 2002.
The outcome is by ratio wise more TR will be approved comapred to RIR.
Also TR requires min of 1 month against 1 to 8 hrs cycle time for RIR adjudication when once the case is taken up after everything is in place.
The above observation is based on TR Guide published by DOL.
It was confirmed from Murthy.com that they will have seperate two Q's against the same apprehension of you posted to them.
Whyallthis said:This is so annoying maan, what are we guys are doing? Assumptions , assumptions and assumptions.
If it has one que or two, have they reached 2001 or 2002, damn it's getting rediculous.
Guys like Icarus and those masters of information, why you guys give incomplete information, either you guys give complete information or don't give atall. Why show hopes and then torture us. I have seen few people sinseourly asking few question and no answers. Then why these masters first of all visit these forums. Is that you guys get pleasure by troubling people.
If you guys don't have any information , why cann't you masters come out and say sorry guys , currently we don't have any information or won't have any information for days or weeks or months. So atleast guys like us who are waiting for our turn of approval won't spend everyday getting bothered about what happens next day.
And I think all the guys like me who are waiting for our approvals, I think sometimes I guess we have to just leave everything to our destiny.
So if anybody has good news kindly let us know but anybody has depressing assumptions just don't worry, something good will come up.
And these Masters of Information like Icarus, write in detail if you have any information and answer to people when they have genuine questions but if you don't have anything just say so.
Whyallthis said:This is so annoying maan, what are we guys are doing? Assumptions , assumptions and assumptions.
If it has one que or two, have they reached 2001 or 2002, damn it's getting rediculous.
Guys like Icarus and those masters of information, why you guys give incomplete information, either you guys give complete information or don't give atall. Why show hopes and then torture us. I have seen few people sinseourly asking few question and no answers. Then why these masters first of all visit these forums. Is that you guys get pleasure by troubling people.
If you guys don't have any information , why cann't you masters come out and say sorry guys , currently we don't have any information or won't have any information for days or weeks or months. So atleast guys like us who are waiting for our turn of approval won't spend everyday getting bothered about what happens next day.
And I think all the guys like me who are waiting for our approvals, I think sometimes I guess we have to just leave everything to our destiny.
So if anybody has good news kindly let us know but anybody has depressing assumptions just don't worry, something good will come up.
And these Masters of Information like Icarus, write in detail if you have any information and answer to people when they have genuine questions but if you don't have anything just say so.
Whyallthis said:Hey guys thanks for your feedback on my earlier post
Some people got irritated and some found it ok. Well thanks to all.
I just want to tell few who said about these gurus or masters as some call them, that kindly don't make these gurus your gods.
Who knows if the information we get is true or false. I can BS by saying hey I know freind whose PD is 2002 got approved and keep quite for a while and trouble everybody by making them think whats going on.
My point is simple when somebody has information or gets information kindly don't play with peoples mind. Either say you have information or you don't have, don't just sit in the dark when somebody ask you their queries and see people pulling their hair out. Thats all.
offcourse I am one of you guys who is just waiting, waiting, waiting to hear some good news. I am not hear to say I am different.
antonioa77 said:i have few questions:
1-so u r saying that in either case the RIR cases will be cleared in few months compared to traditional?
No, not in terms of completing every RIR in next few months
What I mean is they will also take up RIR and TR seperately. Since more there are more TR cases there will be more analyst working on those cases comapred to RIR cases. So in the end both will get adjudicated eg. 3cases of RIR against 7 cases of TR.
2-second i have a question about PW. the requirement in my 750 form ask sfor MS with 0 exp, but my wage is slightly above level 1 although for civil engineering the typical requirement is BS, so i expect that DOl will come , when they process my case, and ask to change the wage to Level 2 which is much higher than my actual wage.
the thing is that i'm worried that my employer will not accept to pay me the level 2 wage. is there a trick to turn around that especially that GC is for future employement which means that PW should be paid after getting the GC? can u explain?and if the doesn't change it what will happen?
This is a very hard guess how they will adjudicate in future that too in BEC.
However from your question your 750 the requirement is MS + 0 , Do you meet this requirement. If not what is substitution they have written .
Bottom line Job requirement specified should meet your Qualification + experience. regarding priviling wage that should meet 95% .
Certain level1 jobs also requires higher qualification like Libririan requires MS but the job level need not be level2. In that sense priviling wage may be at level 1.
However if you have doubts better get this clarified with an immigration lawyer to have better understanding. Forum answers are only based on personal experience and interpretion.
I don't wana wait for yrs for a case that will loose at the end.
Anand_Mishra said:it look like you are looking for only favorable info. if you don't like any info Please ignore that and move on. thx.
S_Chicago, I am ready whenever you send me tickets ;-).s_chicago said:Looks like we all here little frustrated. We have valid reason though!!!
My suggestion is, let's take us a break and go for a Florida vacation! And cricket fans of this board, let's watch some IND-PAK match and get our frustration diverted.
![]()
Whyallthis said:Hey guys thanks for your feedback on my earlier post
Some people got irritated and some found it ok. Well thanks to all.
I just want to tell few who said about these gurus or masters as some call them, that kindly don't make these gurus your gods.
Who knows if the information we get is true or false. I can BS by saying hey I know freind whose PD is 2002 got approved and keep quite for a while and trouble everybody by making them think whats going on.
My point is simple when somebody has information or gets information kindly don't play with peoples mind. Either say you have information or you don't have, don't just sit in the dark when somebody ask you their queries and see people pulling their hair out. Thats all.
offcourse I am one of you guys who is just waiting, waiting, waiting to hear some good news. I am not hear to say I am different.
antonioa77 said:i have few questions:
2-second i have a question about PW. the requirement in my 750 form ask sfor MS with 0 exp, but my wage is slightly above level 1 although for civil engineering the typical requirement is BS, so i expect that DOl will come , when they process my case, and ask to change the wage to Level 2 which is much higher than my actual wage.
the thing is that i'm worried that my employer will not accept to pay me the level 2 wage. is there a trick to turn around that especially that GC is for future employement which means that PW should be paid after getting the GC? can u explain?and if the doesn't change it what will happen?
I don't wana wait for yrs for a case that will loose at the end.