Concurrent Filing - Using Cross Chargeability
- Thread starter radd
- Start date
overbd...
In my case the aquisition has not yet been announced and even if it get announced today..it will take some time for the process to completed
..so I might have the time... hope its the same in your case..
u dont need to panic when the news is announced..it depends on when the deal is completed...and name change etc is done
In my case the aquisition has not yet been announced and even if it get announced today..it will take some time for the process to completed
..so I might have the time... hope its the same in your case..
u dont need to panic when the news is announced..it depends on when the deal is completed...and name change etc is done
overboard said:
overboard,
don't worry abt the acquisition... looks like you can you can get away with it before 180 days are up... I got this in this forum... if you need to use it..just inform USCIS about AC21 after 180 days are over...
http://boards.immigrationportal.com/showpost.php?p=1454216&postcount=90
Hope this helps in easing your tension..
But I'm sure you'll get GC even before that..radd
Last edited by a moderator:
Are there any new filers under CC? seems like there are only the several of us here who have used cc to file... guess all from mar/apr..
I just wish the ball would start rolling.. Once one of us gets approved.. all of us would see some light too.. just like the I140/ead/ap approvals.. This has been the longest June in my life... Just waiting for each day to past
radd
I just wish the ball would start rolling.. Once one of us gets approved.. all of us would see some light too.. just like the I140/ead/ap approvals.. This has been the longest June in my life... Just waiting for each day to past
radd
Last edited by a moderator:
Radd, I hear ya...I think each one of us mirrors your sentiment. The last ray of light we had was through bbking. As far are new CC filers go, not everyone using CC might be on the boards. Unfortunately CC itself isnt well known enough, and I don't know how many folks that are eligilble for CC arent utilizing it simply because they aren't aware of it and neither are their attorneys. I really hope, like you, that one of us gets an approval...that would spark some life into everyone.radd said:
Brittany Spears
Registered Users (C)
hi
m back on th cross chargeability forum since i had an RFE on my 140...
My 140 is cleard now....now watiting for 485 to be cleared..Can you let me know if its ok to send my medical now since my lawyer didnt send it at hte time of filing or should i wait for RFE on my 485 for medical
I noticed with RFE on I 140 it got cleared immediately after 4 days of their receipt of RFE.. So I dont know if its better to wait for theri RFE for my medical or should I send it right away
m back on th cross chargeability forum since i had an RFE on my 140...
My 140 is cleard now....now watiting for 485 to be cleared..Can you let me know if its ok to send my medical now since my lawyer didnt send it at hte time of filing or should i wait for RFE on my 485 for medical
I noticed with RFE on I 140 it got cleared immediately after 4 days of their receipt of RFE.. So I dont know if its better to wait for theri RFE for my medical or should I send it right away
wondering99
Registered Users (C)
I'm the primary applicant and my wife is filing with me. My lawyer just passed me the 485 filing she prepared. I noticed that in the blank that asking my place of birth, she has writen down my wife's place of birth and put "spouse" in (). It is like
Country of Birth: XYZ (SPOUSE)
XYZ is my wife's place of birth. She said by filling the form this way, it is obviously a crosschargbility case. I'm wondering if my country of birth should be filled in since the form is asking my information. How is everyone else dealing with this issue?
Wondering
Country of Birth: XYZ (SPOUSE)
XYZ is my wife's place of birth. She said by filling the form this way, it is obviously a crosschargbility case. I'm wondering if my country of birth should be filled in since the form is asking my information. How is everyone else dealing with this issue?
Wondering
Brittany Spears
Registered Users (C)
my pd 01/01 means 1st jan 2006
radd said:
Wondering,wondering99 said:
Interesting approach. I don't believe that any harm can come of it, but your country of birth is your country of birth. The CC rule in my case was explicitly mentioned in the "Other" section of the form where the form asks you on what basis you're filing for Adjustment of Status. My country of birth was left at my country of birth and the country charged was filled in with my spouse's country of nativity.
In CC cases, the one that matters most is the country of birth, so if the lawyer feels that this method would make it more obvious, then I guess its a good thing. I'd also suggest not omitting the CC notes when she checks off the 'other' category and perhaps enclosing a CC cover letter, just to make sure that you cover all your bases.
Good luck & keep us posted.
k
wondering99 said:
I don't think you should agree to it. USCIS makes mistakes even when all entries are filled out correctly.. they are like machines.. they only read what they are programed for..
I know a user yll_gc who used CC and he was the first to get approved sometime end of last year.. For some reason he did not post his approval here.. however I sent his a PM regarding his GC status and this was his reply:
[Hi Radd,
Thanks for your message. Yes, I got my GC based on CC. However, also because of this, the USCIS messed up and they put my spouse's country of birth as my country of birth on my GC. I filed an I-90 for correction last year, and now it is still not approved yet.
I hope you GC via CC will be approved soon.
Best of luck with you.]
He got his approval last year and up till this message (May 15th), he is still waiting for the correction..
Better to just fill in your COB and attach the CC letter.. If data is entered wrongly, it is you who will pay for it not your lawyer...
good luck,
radd