Changing Employer before 6 Months (After GC Stamping)

[FunnyWait]

You are now exposed as a complete moron who doesn't know any of the most basic immigration rules.

Just because you don't agree it means somebody is a moron ??

Answer my question in one of the threads above.

 

[pralay]

If spouse is going to work and get her GC through her employer then it may be correct but if she is going to get GC thru husband then wrong.

Is there any rule or logic that H1/L1 always has to get GC thru "employer". How is it different from getting thru employer or getting as dependent?

 

[FunnyWait]

You are completely wrong!
Learn the law before posting such utter and complete BS.

You are now exposed as a complete moron who doesn't know any of the most basic immigration rules.
And such a guy has the audacity to talk about rules after becoming a PR or rules of carrying the GC...
Geez, learn at least some basic stuff before you make a complete and utter fool of yourself.

At the time of nonimmigration visa application you have to provide necessary bindings in your home country to prove that you have intensions to go back. Basic information !!! And you claim to be an expert.

 

[FunnyWait]

Then she can't get an H1, because an H1 always requires a job offer from an employer.
You are really getting silly. Where you hiding in a hole the last 15 years since the H1 exists???

You got yourself contradicted. Than why did you suggest H1/L1 option to that person ????

 

[pralay]

At the time of nonimmigration visa application you have to provide necessary bindings in your home country to prove that you have intensions to go back. Basic information !!!

Not for H1 or L1. I myself was a H1 holder and I don't remember I had to provide any "binding".

 

[TheRealCanadian]

At the time of nonimmigration visa application you have to provide necessary bindings in your home country to prove that you have intensions to go back. Basic information !!! And you claim to be an expert.

Certainly not required for an H or L. There is a section of the INA that explicitly states that an H or L visa or admission cannot be denied based on immigrant intent.

 

[FunnyWait]

JoeF - You still haven't answer my question above. It's clear that you are a complete moron and half educated person. When somebody doesn't agree with you, you just hold the entire board hostage and start attacking that person.

I think I have made my point to show you as someone who is likely to give information that's not useful as you never consult attorneys and merely provide links to websites.
Members of this board need to come together and stop you from hijacking the board. You have rights to posts info here and but don't expect everybody will agree with you.

 

[qwerty987666]

JoeF and his donkey,

Get yourself educated on H1/L1 law first, before preaching anybody about "Life after GC" forum. It seems that you have lot to catch up with H1/L1 laws, get those schooling first and then Join this forum.

Remember/Read this forum's title "Life After GC". Immature kids and trolls like you are not allowed to posts on this forums.

Ok friends

 

[FunnyWait]

-----Not for H1 or L1. I myself was a H1 holder and I don't remember I had to provide any "binding".



Of course H1/L1 is a nonimmigration visa and if asked you need to. They don't ask everytime but they do and can ask. Also remember the question at hand is H1/L1 for a GC holder's spouse and not otherwise. Don't confuse yourself.

 

[qwerty987666]

shows lack of H1/L1 knowledge.

Read my advice again

Get yourself educated on H1/L1 law first, before preaching anybody about "Life after GC" forum. It seems that you have lot to catch up with H1/L1 laws, get those schooling first and then Join this forum.

Remember/Read this forum's title "Life After GC". Immature kids and trolls like you are not allowed to posts on this forums.

 

[FunnyWait]

JoeF - I am going to give you a last chance. You tell us how a GC holder's spouse can get H1/L1 by telling a visa officer at the consulate that she is married to a GC holder and intends to immigrate (though she has job offer for H1/L1). If she doesn't say this will she not be breaking the law ?

Last chance - answer it loose it.

 

[qwerty987666]

Completely LOST his mind and started grumblings and personal attack, with "Name Calling"

Moderator , Please keep an eye on this "Name Calling" by JoeF, We understand that its just LOOSERS grumblings but apprently breaking forum's rule. Take appropriate action at once.

JoeF,Read my advice again

Get yourself educated on H1/L1 law first, before preaching anybody about "Life after GC" forum. It seems that you have lot to catch up with H1/L1 laws, get those schooling first and then Join this forum.

Remember/Read this forum's title "Life After GC". Immature kids and trolls like you are not allowed to posts on this forums.

 

[TheRealCanadian]

Moderator , Please keep an eye on this "Name Calling" by JoeF, We understand that its just LOOSERS grumblings but apprently breaking forum's rule. Take appropriate action at once.

Looking at your post, it seems to be a clear case of the pot calling the kettle black. BTW, his take on H1/L1 is accurate. Immigrant intent is no barrier to obtaining the visa or admission in H/L status.

 

[pralay]

Of course H1/L1 is a nonimmigration visa and if asked you need to. They don't ask everytime but they do and can ask.

Actually I never heard someone applying for H1/L1 was questioned about immigration intent. For H1/L1 applications all that matters is a valid job offer in USA.

Also remember the question at hand is H1/L1 for a GC holder's spouse and not otherwise. Don't confuse yourself.

Does not matter. Being a single/unmarried who is coming to USA can have immigrant intent and being a GC holder's spouse can have immigrant intent - there is no difference. But I guess if someone's spouse is GC holder, his/her H1/L1 visa application can get more scrutiny - whether the job offer is valid one (especially true if wife intends to join the very same company where husband is working) or it's just way for "merely joining spouse". But otherwise, there is no issue for immigration intent.

 

[FunnyWait]

BTW, his take on H1/L1 is accurate. Immigrant intent is no barrier to obtaining the visa or admission in H/L status.

Not valid when considered with respect to GC holder's spouse is applying with an intension to immigrate.

Anyway. I spent 2 hours posting on this board and now let me go back to work. But it gave me an idea as to how JoeF must be spending his time posting all through the day. I wish I had an employer like JoeF who allows him to posts whole day and still pays him !!

 

[TheRealCanadian]

Not valid when considered with respect to GC holder's spouse is applying with an intension to immigrate.

The law is clear - an H/L cannot be denied based on immigrant intent. It doesn't matter wether you are married to a GC holder, an adjustee, being sponsored by an employer, self-sponsoring, or sponsored by a family member.

There are a variety of different requirements for the non-immigrant categories. Some require a foreign residence, others do not. Some forbid immigrant intent, others allow it.

 

[qwerty987666]

Looking at your post, it seems to be a clear case of the pot calling the kettle black. BTW, his take on H1/L1 is accurate. Immigrant intent is no barrier to obtaining the visa or admission in H/L status.

Oh oh, somebody is mad because I disagreed with JoeF's "Name Calling". And guess what, who is that, its one of moderator.

TheRealCanadian, you were very quick to "Reported" such "Name calling" previously... Don't you? Where you have lost that efficiency??? Does JoeF's bambarded postings stuck in your head too?? Or Does rule apply differently to JoeF and other members?? Come straight,,,dude

 

[rgeneblazo]

I wish I had an employer like JoeF who allows him to posts whole day and still pays him !!

I understand JoeF owns his company, so I respectfully submit that it is none of our business to scrutinize how he's spending his hours. Personally, I think his posts and views on US immigration are accurate and informative. But that's just me. No flames, please.

 

[qwerty987666]

I understand JoeF owns his company, so I respectfully submit that it is none of our business to scrutinize how he's spending his hours. Personally, I think his posts and views on US immigration are accurate and informative. But that's just me. No flames, please.

Are you kidding ??? You beleive JoeF aka nutcase? He has 1000's of such LIES on this forum and this is just one more. Just ignore JoeF

 

[FunnyWait]

Oh oh, somebody is mad because I disagreed with JoeF's "Name Calling". And guess what, who is that, its one of moderator.

TheRealCanadian, you were very quick to "Reported" such "Name calling" previously... Don't you? Where you have lost that efficiency??? Does JoeF's bambarded postings stuck in your head too?? Or Does rule apply differently to JoeF and other members?? Come straight,,,dude

I agree with querty. TheRealCanadian was prompt in reporting his name calling but has not used the same set of protocols with JoeF. Any reason ? As a moderator I hope you know that you are not allowed to take any sides.