Anand_Mishra said:Hi mnhrdc,
I am wrong. It's can't be unique no generated by system.
P-04301-29xxx(not recd)
P-04307-32xxx(not recd)
D-04331-04xxx(recd letter)
it is logical for first two. but not for third. if 301th day system has unique number 29xxx then it can't go back and have 331th day number 04xxx.
btw, my PD-June 26th 2003
Thx
Ok my mistake typo
But still have time to break the logic,
Can we have some more data from cases recived new ETA nos with state PD
Also request ZB to collect this info in his threads
Assumptions
Data entered for Cases transferred from SFO,Phily,TX to BEC based on RO
If this is true only few cases may have overlap for generation of Nos.
But still processing can be done based on PD FIFO + Bec location.
Now makes sense if we capture based on PD and last new ETA digits.
D-04320-01xxx(not recd) Pd 6/05/02
D-04321-04xxx(recd) PD 06/20/02
P-04301-29xxx(not recd)
P-04307-32xxx(not recd) PD 06/26/02
Last edited by a moderator: