interview ended (as expected) with name check pending
Folks,
Want to update on my interview. It went pretty smooth.
Majority of time spent for proofing my employment (yes, they do it for extraordinary, EB1A cases very diligently because it is employment-based application still).
Regular subset of questions that was described in this forum pretty diligently by other people. Officer said that my case is very straightforward and i have just to wait for my name chack clearance from FBI.
I end up with "name check pending" and my family must dangle bcs they are dependent on my case.
Name check clearance is done with the classic evil scenario, "their namechecks are cleared, mine is not".
It tells me a lot.... about couple of terrorists on the wall near the room 103.
By the way duo portrait is without any title neither on top nor beneath.
I would add " WANTED FOR ILLEGAL WEAPONRY SALE TO TERRORIST COUNTRIES".
Err... digressed again...
Speaking about interview experience
Officer was very nice. he told me my NC pending from October 2003.
It was nice experience. I was able to ask questions and got answers.
Officer told me that I am not alone.
There are ~450 people in the same category (NC pending for 2 years) in Baltimore.
Situation is not better for citizenship petitioners.
I wish everyone the best of luck and hope to see nobody in forums where I am moving : "My name check experience"- where citizenship petitioners are participating as well. and "stuck in name check-let's track it"
http://boards.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?t=174845&page=23&pp=15
Otherwise I fully agree with IZMR (see his/her post after interview in this forum).
Now I know that my name check (NC) is pending from October 2003.
Interestingly enough, I noticed that USCIS customers are treated quite differently when they are petitioner-in-process and when they about to get GC (or CZ) at interview.
Difference in personnel.
When petioner come to RM 101 (infopass in-process or visa question) they met personnel through window. The personnel that I met in room 101 was kind of unprofessional (at least last year and a half). More down-to-earth statement "personnel was either rude, agressive or weakly responsive".
I wasn't able to get too much out.
Feeling was that you talking to "Bazzaar peddler" and you want to get cheapest possible price out
When you go to interview, people who conduct it are nicer, looks more intelligent and (seemed to me) have at least BS degrees. I ve seen other people being interviewed with (young and )professionally looking officers.
Is that my impression only ?