M
Morning
Guest
Lazerthegreat
I have my plastic GC in hand today.
Finally! Congratulations!
I have my plastic GC in hand today.
Finally! Congratulations!
yyliu88 said:just a question, do we have to file summon along with the lawsuit or the court will prepare for u and mail to u?
thanks alot!
talie777 said:I am very tempted to do the same but just wondering if there will be any residual effects for pursuing a writ. I mean will I be given a hard time when applying/ interviewing for citizenship if the IO finds out that I have tried to sue the government/ agencies?
talie777 said:I am very tempted to do the same but just wondering if there will be any residual effects for pursuing a writ. I mean will I be given a hard time when applying/ interviewing for citizenship if the IO finds out that I have tried to sue the government/ agencies?
Singh6 said:Lazer...I just had a chance to read this thread ... Congratulations for taking such a bold step....It could be a real good encouragement for the peopel who are still stuck in the loops.... Also congrats for your new status
I-K-A-K-O said:Ok people believe it or not i am going to sue USCIS. As you see from my signature, i waited for my initial asylum interview for a 2.5 years. I think the fact that I waited 2 & ½ years to prior to even being given an asylum interview is significant in that most interviews take place within a month or two upon submittal..And this should be very good reason to sue them now. Any advices will be appreciated.
Lazerthegreat said:USCIS website shows that they are processing may 2001 cases right now. Make sure that you have exhausted all remedies before your pursue this path.
Lazerthegreat said:USCIS website shows that they are processing may 2001 cases right now. Make sure that you have exhausted all remedies before your pursue this path.
I-K-A-K-O said:The reason to sue them in my case is not a I-485 precessing delay, but the fact that i waited for 2.5 years for my initial asylum interview. If i had my first interview on time my ND now would be 2003 not 2005.
GrassRoot said:Lazer,
Did you mean for those whose ND are later than May 2001 but stuck in CIS or FBI there will be less chance to win WOM ? Thank you. Please check your PM.
I-K-A-K-O said:If i do this i am going to hire lawyer. I am not going to do it myself. So it's gonna be waste of money not time and it's ok. GC is more then money for me. I think my benefit in this case should be to get GC sooner because of the 2.5/y delay, not a mental satisfaction.
GrassRoot said:Lazer,
Did you mean for those whose ND are later than May 2001 but stuck in CIS or FBI there will be less chance to win WOM ? Thank you. Please check your PM.
ernorman said:Grassroot,
As long as you have a "good" reason for expediting your case, and you actually did make a request. They either rejected/had no response or agreed but not acting, you should be able to demonstrate to the court that the court needs to review your case.
In my case, although my asylum was approved in Jan 05 and my ND is Jan 06, I made an expedite request and it was granted: "It was determined that your application is eligible for special processing..." However, the "special" processing turned out to be "no action". I sent them a warning letter saying that I would sue them if my application was not adjudicated within 30 days. I filed lawsuit simply to maintain my credibility that I act on my demand letter.
ernorman said:Grassroot,
As long as you have a "good" reason for expediting your case, and you actually did make a request. They either rejected/had no response or agreed but not acting, you should be able to demonstrate to the court that the court needs to review your case.
In my case, although my asylum was approved in Jan 05 and my ND is Jan 06, I made an expedite request and it was granted: "It was determined that your application is eligible for special processing..." However, the "special" processing turned out to be "no action". I sent them a warning letter saying that I would sue them if my application was not adjudicated within 30 days. I filed lawsuit simply to maintain my credibility that I act on my demand letter.
ernorman said:Without knowing my case, please refrain from commenting negatively. Even USCIS agreed, without any doubt, that my case needs to be expedited based on "national interest situation".
http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/fieldoffices/expedited.htm
Any reasonable person, including federal judge, would agree that.
14ksusha said:I don't see your criteria there: a whining asylee. Could you specify what other criteria do you fall under? 'National interest situation'? What would that be, just give me a hint!