patiencelessTX
Registered Users (C)
ver 233
rescanned from 01-001 to 01-258
rescanned from 01-001 to 01-258
TSC I485 Tracker for March 2004
- Thread starter goastros
- Start date
ver 235
changes -
+ rescan and reached upto 02-026.
I wanted to see the approval count go above 1000..but it is still at 983. with Nov 01 to be rescanned.
good news is we saw some approvals yesterday for dec 01.
Now that the off. processing date is of july 01, people like longgc
& krishnakumar from may 01 can officially call & be adjusted.
changes -
+ rescan and reached upto 02-026.
I wanted to see the approval count go above 1000..but it is still at 983. with Nov 01 to be rescanned.
good news is we saw some approvals yesterday for dec 01.
Now that the off. processing date is of july 01, people like longgc
& krishnakumar from may 01 can officially call & be adjusted.
Last edited by a moderator:
IndianInDallas
Registered Users (C)
Data for Feb 05,2003 ie, 03-088
Here is the file, there are some changes in Feb and March of 04. Please add to the cons file.
Here is the file, there are some changes in Feb and March of 04. Please add to the cons file.
patiencelessTX
Registered Users (C)
changes -
+ rescan and reached upto 02-035.
Feb approval count @ 1006
+ rescan and reached upto 02-035.
Feb approval count @ 1006
Re: reply
tr22,
I think I have a fix for the text version of browser. It needs text=Y only when you launch the explorer. You do not need it in subsequent queries( navigations).
We can even do that with the original one interactively ( that is how I got it). Once the explorer is launched you can click once on the Text/Graph selection on the left corner and it continues in text mode.
I thought it will make a big diffrence , but it didnot. I tried on dial up and it appears to be about 20% faster. As I know most guys scanning are on broadband/dsl and they even won't notice. It is hard to notice even on dial up. But I timed for about 500 each.
However it looks like this works , I tried on both dial up and a T1.
patincelessTx/goastros,
If you get a chance give a try. Nice to have another variant. If some one has a problem like Tr22 mentioned it may come handy.
--pr
tr22,
I think I have a fix for the text version of browser. It needs text=Y only when you launch the explorer. You do not need it in subsequent queries( navigations).
We can even do that with the original one interactively ( that is how I got it). Once the explorer is launched you can click once on the Text/Graph selection on the left corner and it continues in text mode.
I thought it will make a big diffrence , but it didnot. I tried on dial up and it appears to be about 20% faster. As I know most guys scanning are on broadband/dsl and they even won't notice. It is hard to notice even on dial up. But I timed for about 500 each.
However it looks like this works , I tried on both dial up and a T1.
patincelessTx/goastros,
If you get a chance give a try. Nice to have another variant. If some one has a problem like Tr22 mentioned it may come handy.
--pr
gatonegro,
Literally speaking yes you are right. From a statistical point of view November is fully covered. I still scan once in a while when I have some time and mood some of those left over ranges including Nov. ( So do few others except patiencelesTX who at times do in a bulk and gets so much of them, Thanks man, but it does not make sense for me to thank as it is so much his business as much as mine ). I feel with fair amount of certainty that I won't find more than another 100 or even less cases in November when fully complete (if at all it happens ) over and above the so far found 7051 cases.
However as it is a painfull and slow process to get the initial scan completed , would you like to help filling in some. I would prefer something outside the November zone as it is more or less complete. However if you are on SRC02-029 it will help too.
If you are willing to help in this process, open those sheets (including src02-029) and look at column I/J which will give you the from and to ranges already scanned. In most case you will also find the Max number upto which you may have to scan.
Please feel free to scan and post as induvidual sheets or into the consolidated file.
Thanks and hoping to see some more data added in those gaps.
atleast in those data ranges where people have specific knowledge of as their number belong there.
--pr
Literally speaking yes you are right. From a statistical point of view November is fully covered. I still scan once in a while when I have some time and mood some of those left over ranges including Nov. ( So do few others except patiencelesTX who at times do in a bulk and gets so much of them, Thanks man, but it does not make sense for me to thank as it is so much his business as much as mine ). I feel with fair amount of certainty that I won't find more than another 100 or even less cases in November when fully complete (if at all it happens ) over and above the so far found 7051 cases.
However as it is a painfull and slow process to get the initial scan completed , would you like to help filling in some. I would prefer something outside the November zone as it is more or less complete. However if you are on SRC02-029 it will help too.
If you are willing to help in this process, open those sheets (including src02-029) and look at column I/J which will give you the from and to ranges already scanned. In most case you will also find the Max number upto which you may have to scan.
Please feel free to scan and post as induvidual sheets or into the consolidated file.
Thanks and hoping to see some more data added in those gaps.
atleast in those data ranges where people have specific knowledge of as their number belong there.
--pr
Last edited by a moderator:
patiencelessTX
Registered Users (C)
pradha,
We all owe you a big thanks as you delivered yet another wonderful feature even though it is your business. I tried this myself way back in last year but the graph does not look this great. (partly because there was not enough data)
Here is another idea on gauging when TSC will jump to new blocks. I have been monitoring how many RFE* are out there in the current block. For example, there are 2092 RFE* cases in 2001. Besides that there are 4800 cases. This tells me that we can expect bulk RFE's on next block after two months. Bulk approvals might come after three months.
Could you add some feature to show this perspective?
We all owe you a big thanks as you delivered yet another wonderful feature even though it is your business. I tried this myself way back in last year but the graph does not look this great. (partly because there was not enough data)
Here is another idea on gauging when TSC will jump to new blocks. I have been monitoring how many RFE* are out there in the current block. For example, there are 2092 RFE* cases in 2001. Besides that there are 4800 cases. This tells me that we can expect bulk RFE's on next block after two months. Bulk approvals might come after three months.
Could you add some feature to show this perspective?
patiencelessTX
Registered Users (C)
more thanks.
the text version fix works out fine for me. thanks to pradha and tr22. I know this is a faster way for me at home. I will do a test later.
also the file saving problem is gone. who do i owe the thank-you?
the text version fix works out fine for me. thanks to pradha and tr22. I know this is a faster way for me at home. I will do a test later.
also the file saving problem is gone. who do i owe the thank-you?
Re: Re: One more view of the data
You can help in finding the missing numbers by scanning and post the data here.
Are you willing to help ?
gatonegro, looks like 02-029 is your date.Originally posted by gatonegro
Not exactly. SRC02-029 needs a full rescan. There are numbers missing in the 5xxxx range. I know for sure.
You can help in finding the missing numbers by scanning and post the data here.
Are you willing to help ?
GC_Aspirant_11
Registered Users (C)
Rescanned Dec'01
March Count 1082.
March Count 1082.
RFE question
patiencelessTx,
I am not clear what way we can look at RFE's. I too was pondering over that sometime back. Here is what my thought finally took me to.
It is tough to watch the RFE, as genuine RFEs vanish in approx one month time. Others are either wrong info or some crazy officer picked one file send an RFE and shoved the file back into the pile. That is the only explanation I can think of for those RFE's sitting there from 2002. Either way we will figure out nothing based on those stats.
May be immediate couple of week's RFE will give some clue to what can be expected in the next couple of weeks.
It was just my thinking. However if some pattern can be generated we can use that too to pass time ( We both have close to an year to go any way) . I was not very clear with your message
Goastros, any ideas in RFE direction??
--pr
patiencelessTx,
I am not clear what way we can look at RFE's. I too was pondering over that sometime back. Here is what my thought finally took me to.
It is tough to watch the RFE, as genuine RFEs vanish in approx one month time. Others are either wrong info or some crazy officer picked one file send an RFE and shoved the file back into the pile. That is the only explanation I can think of for those RFE's sitting there from 2002. Either way we will figure out nothing based on those stats.
May be immediate couple of week's RFE will give some clue to what can be expected in the next couple of weeks.
It was just my thinking. However if some pattern can be generated we can use that too to pass time ( We both have close to an year to go any way) . I was not very clear with your message
Goastros, any ideas in RFE direction??
--pr
patiencelessTX
Registered Users (C)
that makes sense, pradha. i rest my case against RFE.
Raju Badmash
Registered Users (C)
I dont see any data on SRC -020 and SRC 021. The list goes from 019 to 022.
Raju Badmash
Registered Users (C)
I meant SRC 03-020 and 03- 021