Doesn't that quote prove that he's not currently under a formal quarantine, and that he is not legally required to stay in his home?Maybe your understanding of “in the home” is different to the health authorities. Here is what happened to someone who did not stay literally in the home:
“Page said health and county officials learned about the father's actions Sunday and told him that he needs to stay in isolation. If he does not comply with orders, health officials will seek a court order and "issue a formal quarantine that will require him and the rest of his family to stay in their home by the force of law," Yes, this is someone with known exposure, but that doesn’t change the principle from someone who just doesn’t yet know they’ve been exposed.
it’s sad that it seems some people need to be forced or coerced into things like this. Maybe you still live in an area that is not affected yet so you are still unaware of how quickly it spreads. or maybe you just don’t care about potentially being the asymptomatic carrier passing it onto a vulnerable person who dies as a result. It’s a public health issue, it’s not just about you.
CDC says "During that time, you should stay home and limit interactions with others as much as possible." This is the same thing I've been saying. Notice the "should" and "as much as possible". It is still legally permissible to go to places outside your home; just do it as little as possible. I remember seeing a paper they gave to someone for self-quarantine that said something like "your movement is not restricted".