IMO 19500-20000
@Britsimon
Well its not so easy to calculate not for me, we still have too many unknowns. I said earlier Ready status is nasty variable thats why we need new CEAC.But for EU lower density at high stage is very positive sign,in last 15000(40-55k) we could have only 2k-3k visas issued...so 19.5-20k is something in my head for all EU CNs.Before I was not sure about term "reducing the density", but after the August numbers this looks like trend that continues.And I dont think this statement is valid for EU "However according to the State Department DV-2014 applicants have responded at a much higher rate than in previous years, resulting in greater visa number use by those with lower rank numbers and slower forward movement of the cut-off dates." because with higher density in lower numbers 40150 is really good actually for last cut off, in June EU was on 12500-13000k Issued.What do you think?Thats why I bet on EU current
Right, the problem is that you are taking the 40150 number (11 months) and comparing with the June CeAC number (8 months). You are ignoring the existing pace of issuances (2k per month) which would take the 13k to 19k even if they didn't increase above the 40150. Then there are aos cases which do not appear in the CEAC data but will add around 800- 1000 issuances. See what I mean? You are getting convinced about current even though your own (optimistic) visa target is already exceeded even with the numbers already announced.
You could also have figured this out from the selectees total in the CEAC file, but either way you cut it, current for EU looks unlikely.
in Europe would not be 2,000 per month. Simon, you surprise me, the first time you came here? +5300=2000.simple mathRight, the problem is that you are taking the 40150 number (11 months) and comparing with the June CeAC number (8 months). You are ignoring the existing pace of issuances (2k per month) which would take the 13k to 19k even if they didn't increase above the 40150. Then there are aos cases which do not appear in the CEAC data but will add around 800- 1000 issuances. See what I mean? You are getting convinced about current even though your own (optimistic) visa target is already exceeded even with the numbers already announced.
You could also have figured this out from the selectees total in the CEAC file, but either way you cut it, current for EU looks unlikely.
in Europe would not be 2,000 per month. Simon, you surprise me, the first time you came here? +5300=2000.simple math
raevsky whats your thoughts about AF in septemberRegarding EU numbers, whatever cutoff they announce in July for September (40150 again or Unavailable or whatever), it is pretty much obvious visas for EU will exhaust in July or August, maybe except 2-3 visas, and there will be no additional interviews since then
Between 80k and 100kraevsky whats your thoughts about AF in september
huge gap right there raevsky.Between 80k and 100k
We still do not know max numbers for Nigeria, for instance. That is some kind of uncertaintyhuge gap right there raevsky.
What do you mean by Nepal exhausting earlier but no special cut off for Nepal in Sept. Are you suggesting that the density for Nepal is lesser from 9.5k onwards?14-17k, possibly no special cutoff for Nepal, visas for Nepal exhausting earlier than the rest of Asia
i know about egypt max CN *40k*We still do not know max numbers for Nigeria, for instance. That is some kind of uncertainty
I really do not understand your question about density. But I think Nepal shoul not be exhausted even ar 10.5k. Earlier means around mid SeptemberWhat do you mean by Nepal exhausting earlier but no special cut off for Nepal in Sept. Are you suggesting that the density for Nepal is lesser from 9.5k onwards?