San Francisco Regional DOL Tracker - Old (Archived on 09/23/2004)
- Thread starter gp111
- Start date
- Status
have u seen this
http://www.deccan.com/headlines/lead3.shtml?headline=US~detains~city~techie~falsely
Lets go Canada..and make IT success there ..
http://www.deccan.com/headlines/lead3.shtml?headline=US~detains~city~techie~falsely
Lets go Canada..and make IT success there ..
bhadrinath
Registered Users (C)
AVM for cases in State DOL office
Is there a ph num for getting a AVM status on cases in the
state office of the California DOL ?
The one num that I have is for the Region 6 DOL office
in San Francisco (415-975-4617).
Thanx.
-Bhadri
Is there a ph num for getting a AVM status on cases in the
state office of the California DOL ?
The one num that I have is for the Region 6 DOL office
in San Francisco (415-975-4617).
Thanx.
-Bhadri
bucs2004
It means your LC was auto-remanded at one point of time and has been returned to DOL again for re-processing, this is good news.
However if the status remains there for a while then DOL might have issued a 3-option letter to your lawyer. Keep monitoring your case and contact your lawyer if your case stays in this status for a while.
It means your LC was auto-remanded at one point of time and has been returned to DOL again for re-processing, this is good news.
However if the status remains there for a while then DOL might have issued a 3-option letter to your lawyer. Keep monitoring your case and contact your lawyer if your case stays in this status for a while.
The link FLCDatacenter.Com is amazing.
You can download the entire labor certification applications and their processing status. The report is updated through January 31, 2004. They update it once every month.
What I noticed is that the cases that were remanded and sent back to the DOL from SWA after the remand is slowly advancing. Infact, I think they only processed one tenth of the returned applications after remand and many of them hasn't even had a status change from "remand" to "returned from state after remand".
It's so frustrating the fact that basically for fiscal year 2003, they processed the applications twice. Accordingly, when we used to expect one year for DOL - SF to process our applications, we should now expect that it will take two years. What's futile is that we are dealing with a huge backlog and doubling that backlog (which is what happened with the Carlson memo) makes it almost impossible to proceed with this application.
In my opinion, what DOL has done to us is considered to be a ruthless heartless careless act. It shows incompetency of a those employees. If you just observe their remand policy, I don't think they even looked at the applications. All what they looked at is the DOT code and stamped it with remand prior to the Carlson Memo.
The other problem that pauses ahead of us is the backlog in the I-485, the new backlog in the Advanced Parol (P.S., they haven't issued any advanced parols for the past six months.) and the very new backlog in the I-140 (now taking a minimum of 10 months, making the AC 21 inapplicable till the I-140 gets to be issued). For those of you who are still interested in this process, expect a minimum of three to four years to get your passport stamped.
At one time I heard that they were announcing an RFP for the private industry to help them out with processing this huge backlog. Any news on that?
Best wishes to all.
You can download the entire labor certification applications and their processing status. The report is updated through January 31, 2004. They update it once every month.
What I noticed is that the cases that were remanded and sent back to the DOL from SWA after the remand is slowly advancing. Infact, I think they only processed one tenth of the returned applications after remand and many of them hasn't even had a status change from "remand" to "returned from state after remand".
It's so frustrating the fact that basically for fiscal year 2003, they processed the applications twice. Accordingly, when we used to expect one year for DOL - SF to process our applications, we should now expect that it will take two years. What's futile is that we are dealing with a huge backlog and doubling that backlog (which is what happened with the Carlson memo) makes it almost impossible to proceed with this application.
In my opinion, what DOL has done to us is considered to be a ruthless heartless careless act. It shows incompetency of a those employees. If you just observe their remand policy, I don't think they even looked at the applications. All what they looked at is the DOT code and stamped it with remand prior to the Carlson Memo.
The other problem that pauses ahead of us is the backlog in the I-485, the new backlog in the Advanced Parol (P.S., they haven't issued any advanced parols for the past six months.) and the very new backlog in the I-140 (now taking a minimum of 10 months, making the AC 21 inapplicable till the I-140 gets to be issued). For those of you who are still interested in this process, expect a minimum of three to four years to get your passport stamped.
At one time I heard that they were announcing an RFP for the private industry to help them out with processing this huge backlog. Any news on that?
Best wishes to all.
Originally posted by csrini1
Hi GP111,
looks like they are still processing from Nov20th 2002 RD, not even nov21st.
hope this helps.
Csrini.
What does "Received Regional Office" mean, My company lawer told me (long time back) that my case is with the SWA as non-rir after they remanded back to SWA from dol in feb-2002 but when I check the status on http://www.flcdatacenter.com it gives me "Received Regional Office".
My case is ms+0 and was give 3 option so I do not expect reconsideration to DOL.
I do not know what to expect and what is "Received Regional Office" ?
Thanks for all the help.
My case is ms+0 and was give 3 option so I do not expect reconsideration to DOL.
I do not know what to expect and what is "Received Regional Office" ?
Thanks for all the help.
There you go
http://www.flcdatacenter.com/casesearchperm.asp
Not sure how often this database is updated, someone mentioned that only cases till 12/03 are in the database.
001
http://www.flcdatacenter.com/casesearchperm.asp
Not sure how often this database is updated, someone mentioned that only cases till 12/03 are in the database.
001
Transmitted to DOL...Not yet Received at DOL
My Labor Application cleared the SESA and was transmitted to DOL in November 2003.
I have been a close watcher of FLCDATACENTER.COM. I don't see my application listed there. Neither does it get listed in the AVM. Does it get a while to be entered as received by DOL or is it immediate.
Please advice.
My Labor Application cleared the SESA and was transmitted to DOL in November 2003.
I have been a close watcher of FLCDATACENTER.COM. I don't see my application listed there. Neither does it get listed in the AVM. Does it get a while to be entered as received by DOL or is it immediate.
Please advice.
In_GC_Race
Registered Users (C)
Re: Transmitted to DOL...Not yet Received at DOL
Mine got sent to DOL too abt the same time as urs.
According to AVM, the latest case for my company is in July 2003. So, looks like it is taking them a while to update records. It used to be 3-4 months, but with the backlog increasing this time might increase too.
Mine got sent to DOL too abt the same time as urs.
According to AVM, the latest case for my company is in July 2003. So, looks like it is taking them a while to update records. It used to be 3-4 months, but with the backlog increasing this time might increase too.
- Status