• Hello Members, This forums is for DV lottery visas only. For other immigration related questions, please go to our forums home page, find the related forum and post it there.

Result of the court hearing 12th July 2010

From Egor:

UPDATE

Filed: 07/13/2011
Entered: 07/14/2011 RESPONSE to Defendants’ Supplemented Declaration filed by AJITUM JAMES AKABA [...] IVA ZAFIROVA. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit)(jf, )

"I have no idea what this is, don’t ask".



Damn!!! They are still filing and entering??? When will these drama come to an end???

I wonder if any of these people will even make it in America. Imagine going into all these lengths and then after a few years, say - "I wanna go back" lol.
 
Damn!!! They are still filing and entering??? When will these drama come to an end???
As you saw, my first reaction to second affidavit was that it was still incomplete. If would be interesting to compare my comments on the second affidavit with 3rd affidavit.
 
Those were my comments on 2nd affidavit.
Basically, two absurds. White is not going to argue with the second one, but he could have argued with the first one.

Not to me though. I see several additional problems with it.

Country quotas could not be applied on stage 1. That is complete nonsense. Historically they were never applied at all except some countires with high amount of fraud. But they just cannot be applied on stage 1. Absurd.

Another absurd. White noticed only one meaning of random in the dictionary, and DOS repeats his mistake. Complete nonsense.
 
Maybe its because of stupid questions nobody can answer?
Stupid in your opinion. It was a stupid question but yet you are the only person who 'stupidly' replied. Mark my word, you WILL NOT get citizenship with that stink attitude. You will insult or provoke the wrong person..........

All of your posts are rubbish and make no sense. Rather than educate people when questions are asked, you always blow off with negativity. Don't forget that you ARE an IMMIGRANT too. Learn tact.
 
Those were my comments on 2nd affidavit.
Basically, two absurds. White is not going to argue with the second one, but he could have argued with the first one.
Sounds logical and convincing to me.
Not to me though. I see several additional problems with it.

Also, as required by the DV Lottery program, the database program applied region and country limitations to the selection to ensure no single region or country dominated the selection
Country quotas could not be applied on stage 1. That is complete nonsense. Historically they were never applied at all except some countires with high amount of fraud. But they just cannot be applied on stage 1. Absurd.

This random process embodies qualities of unpredictability and equal probability. In other words, the "random" rank-ordering of a list is a term of art that requires specialized software that generates numbers that are mathematically proven to be without any definite aim, direction, rule or method.
Another absurd. White noticed only one meaning of random in the dictionary, and DOS repeats his mistake. Complete nonsense.
 
Do you think the judge will allow a 3rd affidavit? I guess at a certain point she could be really pissed about DOS.
I think DOS provides evidences of complete lack of technical knowledge. However, that is not relevant to the case. Literate or not, DOS invalidated results because they were not random, and they were not. I think all those illiteracies are irrelevant to the point and to the future decision. That is why at certain point the judge could issue the decision even with inaccurate affidavit.
Regarding OIG investigation, they HAVE to provide accurate explanation on all inconsistencies in affidavit as well as an explanations why the software written was not tested properly and how exactly it was tested.
 
Do you think the judge will allow a 3rd affidavit? I guess at a certain point she could be really pissed about DOS.

There is just done affidavit submitted by DoS. What was submitted later was a supplement to answer the concerns White had raised. If the judge finds it pertinent I guess she could ask DoS to submit more information...
 
As you saw, my first reaction to second affidavit was that it was still incomplete. If would be interesting to compare my comments on the second affidavit with 3rd affidavit.

But that was a response from the plantiffs not DOS! So I think there's no 3rd declaration!!!
 
Does anyone have an idea what happens if the judge does not make a decision today? Is DOS allowed to publish the results online (say at midnight tonight, EST)?
 
But i don't see any reasons for them to not publish those results
I see one, if they publish the results and then the court ruling is against them and they have to reinstate the 22K winners they are in real trouble.
 
On May 1 when the results were announced, I tried to check at 5am EST, but it kept saying to come back. Finally, it was opened at 6am EST.
I know the new day starts technically at midnight (12am EST), but the DV results page opens at 6am EST. I hope you'll not sue DOS for being off by 6 hours.
 
Top