Predicted Priority Dates for final quarter of FY2005

Appan:
I asked this in another thread but no response. Do you know the contents of Packet-3? My Attorney just sent a fee bill to St. Louis to yesterday. If I know the contents, I can prepare all the Docs for the attorney in advance and not waste any time answering his questions. Thanks.
 
Appan,

I have not send the e-mail this time. I was sending the e-mails over last four months. This time I refrained.

Raghu
 
bapunagar said:
Appan:
I asked this in another thread but no response. Do you know the contents of Packet-3? My Attorney just sent a fee bill to St. Louis to yesterday. If I know the contents, I can prepare all the Docs for the attorney in advance and not waste any time answering his questions. Thanks.
 
traghu said:
Appan,

I have not send the e-mail this time. I was sending the e-mails over last four months. This time I refrained.

Raghu

appan and others,
same with me. my PD is 20 June 2002.
But I will be sending an email on SUnday night.

Subhash
 
Shusterman.com again has that ticker scrolling down on his web site with now June 11, 2005 date that EB3 will be unavailable and EB2 will retrogress. This guy is killing all the hopes we've been craving for.
 
BapuNagar,

Don't loose your heart. Shusterman may not be correct always.
Let's all pray PD will move forward.

Raghu
 
yup a day before the June visa supplement was declared shuterman website said that they got a confirmed news that there will be no june visa supplement .. and to my surprise the next day DOS pulished the amended june visa bulletin.... so seriously cannot take their every word for granted .... and also their website says that EB3 will unavailable sometime in SUMMER .... now this summer word is a really vague .... i will suggest wait and watch ... definitely there is less EB3 visas left ...but difficult to predict anything ...
 
Very bad news for EB3 tech guys again:

It says that, Sched A take visa nummbers from regular EB3 quota first, and if they run out of them then they take from 50000 pool.


source: http://www.immigration-law.com/

In order to maximize availability of the EB-3 visa numbers available for the Schedule A occupations, when the regular EB-3 visa numbers are available for certain Schedule A EB-3 applicants, they will take out the numbers from the regular EB-3 numbers first. Accordingly, practically more numbers than 50,000 could possible be made available for the Schedule A EB-3 applicants because some of the numbers, particularly Filipino nurses have an earlier priority date and they will take out the numbers from the regular EB-3 quota rather than from the recaptured 50,000 pool. These Schedule A applicants will take the recaptured numbers only
 
for2003 said:
appan and others,
same with me. my PD is 20 June 2002.
But I will be sending an email on SUnday night.

Subhash

Subhash,

Did u receive any mail from the consulate?
 
i find that really hard to believe ...because if that was the case then why did CIS create a separate category for the nurses and PT's.

baby_mde said:
Very bad news for EB3 tech guys again:

It says that, Sched A take visa nummbers from regular EB3 quota first, and if they run out of them then they take from 50000 pool.


source: http://www.immigration-law.com/

In order to maximize availability of the EB-3 visa numbers available for the Schedule A occupations, when the regular EB-3 visa numbers are available for certain Schedule A EB-3 applicants, they will take out the numbers from the regular EB-3 numbers first. Accordingly, practically more numbers than 50,000 could possible be made available for the Schedule A EB-3 applicants because some of the numbers, particularly Filipino nurses have an earlier priority date and they will take out the numbers from the regular EB-3 quota rather than from the recaptured 50,000 pool. These Schedule A applicants will take the recaptured numbers only
 
Me too. I also am not fully convinced if that would happen. Lets hope today the bulletin is out and all speculations put to rest.
nishokie said:
i find that really hard to believe ...because if that was the case then why did CIS create a separate category for the nurses and PT's.
 
AILA has some information at http://www.aila.org/RecentPosting/RecentPostingList.aspx?Weeks=4
titled "The Recaptured 50,000 Schedule A Visa Numbers and Visa Availability Projections for the Remainder of FY05" dated June 10th but requires an AILA membership. Seems to be pretty recent, official and takes the nurses stuff into consideration. Guys, it would help if you can you ask your lawyer to check this out. Would post if I hear back from mine.
 
You are right. EB category will be in big trouble. So it is time to come everyone farward and workout what to do.
 
traghu said:
Subash,

Did you get the reply from consulate?

Thanks,
Raghu

appan,raghu and all,
I still have not received any email reply to my email sent sunday night. Keeping fingers crossed!.
Will let u know guys as soon as I hear from them.

Subhash
 
It is because hard work by USCIS

baby_mde said:
EB category will be in big trouble. So it is time to come everyone farward and workout what to do.


USCIS is approving the pending applications from 2001 to 2004. Earlier people were going CP ,because I-485 was taking lot of time. Now they started to approving the cases we have this retrogression. It was current since 2001 because of AC-21 numbers and limited(or almost nil) I-485 approvals during the post 9-11 period.

Only way to bring it back to current is reducing the approvals of I-485 or bring the bill to increase the visa numbers.
 
Top