Philadelphia Regional DOL Tracker - Old (Archived on 09/23/2004)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can u give more details on the approvals

Hi,
Can u give us more details on the approvals. Which state are these filed from. Are they in the field of software engineering. I presume they are RIR( are they?).

Thanks,
Sameer
 
Hi Sameer2730,

these are filed from delaware. I am not sure whether they are RIR or NON-RIR. All are software engeneering jobs.

Thanks,
guntur03
 
Where they issued a 'NOF" b4 ?

Hi Guntur,
Where they issued a 'NOF' b4 ? - for Filling from a "Satellite Off / Forrum Shopping" - i.e, HQ @ NJ and temp off @ DE?

Can u pls throw some light on those case(s) / Company.

Regards,
Immidude74

Originally posted by Guntur03
Hi Sameer2730,

these are filed from delaware. I am not sure whether they are RIR or NON-RIR. All are software engeneering jobs.

Thanks,
guntur03
 
An article from yahoo...Read it on your own leisure time

Source: Yahoo News...

Backlog of Immigrant Paperwork Growing


Mon Mar 29, 7:55 AM ET



Add Top Stories - Los Angeles Times to My Yahoo!


By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar Times Staff Writer
WASHINGTON — Four years ago, as a presidential candidate hoping to draw Latino votes, then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush vowed to slash the backlog of applications for legal immigration. No one would have to wait longer than six months, he promised.
Despite that resolve, the opposite has happened — more people than ever are facing longer-than-ever delays.
Green cards that would have taken 14 months to process in 2001 are now averaging 33 months. The number of pending applications for such things as replacing a lost green card and obtaining citizenship has shot up nearly 60%, to about 6.2 million. Cases more than 6 months old have increased by 89% since 2000, from 1.8 million to 3.4 million, according to the government.
The main reason for the delays is the increased security checks since the Sept. 11 attacks, according to the Bush administration. But congressional investigators and other critics say insufficient funding, lack of personnel and other shortfalls are also to blame.
The problems with the system have been very real in the life of Elerida Rodrigo, a soft-spoken nurse from the Philippines. Rodrigo, who lives in Torrance, met all the legal requirements for a green card long ago, but it took eight years before she recently got the word that her application had been approved.
"I prayed that the people taking care of my case would be enlightened by the Holy Spirit," said Rodrigo, 34. She was so relieved when she got the news, she said, that it felt like "one of the thorns in my heart came out."
The costs and consequences of the growing delays go beyond personal heartache. Businesses that rely on foreign professionals are facing logistical headaches and added legal costs to maintain their workforces. Family members sponsoring a relative have died while the process dragged on. And some immigrants have lapsed into illegality, risking deportation, because work permits or other papers have expired.
"Even though we say we want immigrants to go through the legal process and not come here illegally, we make the legal process as cumbersome and difficult as we can," said Rep. Howard L. Berman (D-North Hollywood). "That is encouraging the very illegality we are trying to deter."
Annual levels of immigration have held steady since the terrorist attacks. Now the growing backlog raises questions about the ability of the system to handle the additional load that would be created by the president's proposed guest worker program. As many as 8 million to 12 million illegal immigrants could file for legal status.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the arm of the Department of Homeland Security that inherited the work from the old Immigration and Naturalization Service, is the agency struggling with the effect of the increased security checks and scarce resources.
"All of these factors combined to put us where we are today, which is digging out of a very deep hole," said William Yates, head of operations for the immigration agency.
The agency will soon send Congress a backlog elimination plan that is expected to promise that Bush's six-month goal can still be met — but not until 2006.
At bottom, congressional investigators and outside critics say, the agency was simply unprepared to handle its new challenge. Nor has the government assigned a high enough priority to overcoming the obstacles and clearing the backlogs.
"Our government has spent a huge sum of money in elevating the security and the equipment at airports," Yates said. "We have had the mandate. We have not had the funding."
Without question, heightened security concerns have been a big factor in the growth of delays and backlogs. Before Sept. 11, for instance, the government ran full security checks on only some kinds of immigration applicants, such as those seeking citizenship. Now, every applicant must undergo full screening, causing the workload to balloon.
Full Security Checks
Immigration is performing full checks on 7 million applicants a year, compared with 2.5 million before the attacks, Yates said. Out of 4,500 officers who handle immigration applications, 1,000 have been relegated to do nothing but security checks.
In addition, errors have led to costly setbacks. In late 2001, when a security check conducted by the FBI (news - web sites) failed to flag a suspected terrorist who was seeking citizenship, the immigration agency had to recheck 3.2 million applicants to make sure there were no other mistakes.
"We had to put naturalization cases on hold," Yates said. "It put us further in the hole."
More delays resulted when immigration case officers were diverted to handle a controversial registration program for men from predominantly Muslim countries.
Efforts to make the system friendlier and more efficient created their own problems. A national toll-free call center was set up to handle questions and ease some of the burden on immigration district officers.
But the private contractor employees who answer the phones know little about immigration matters, have no access to individual files and largely stick to scripted responses.
"The call center is in Kentucky, but it might as well be in India for all the good it does," said Crystal Williams, the American Immigration Lawyers Assn.'s liaison with the agency. "If the issue is outside the script, they don't know what to do."
Veteran immigration employees say morale within the agency keeps sinking.
"We're as frustrated as the applicants, if not more so," said Brenda Neuerburg, a documentation expert in Baltimore.
"The people who come to us are very irate because their cases are taking so long," she added. "If there is the slightest problem with a case, that increases the time."
Like a bureaucratic nightmare, the backlog has begun to perpetuate itself, say those caught in it.
Consider green cards: Because the applications are taking so long, supporting documents, including fingerprints, medical records and security checks, often become lost or outdated and have to be resubmitted. That means the application is delayed, with more chores for employees and more anxiety for immigrants.
"The backlogs are now much longer than at any time since I've been practicing, and by an exponential factor," said Carl Shusterman, a Los Angeles immigration lawyer with 30 years of experience.
Some immigration employees have taken matters into their own hands.
In December, a former immigration contractor at the agency's Laguna Niguel office was convicted of shredding immigrants' files to clear up a 90,000-document backlog.
Some experts suggest extending the expiration dates for work permits, fingerprints, travel permits and other supporting documents.
"If you know a case is going to take three years, at least you shouldn't bury yourself in other paperwork that is only going to make matters worse," Shusterman said.
Rodrigo, the Torrance nurse, said she had to submit fingerprints three or four times, and at least twice had to have medical checkups. "It's a stressful wait, but I didn't lose hope," she said.
Change of Sponsors
While Ymelda Gonzalez of Gardena waited, her mother, who was her sponsor, died of cancer at age 73. Gonzalez said her request had been pending for more than three years. Now her father is her sponsor. He is 67 and suffers from diabetes and high blood pressure.
"I feel bad," said Gonzalez, 40. "All of my brothers and sisters are U.S. citizens or permanent residents, and I am not. I would like to feel more secure." Originally from Mexico, Gonzalez remains an illegal immigrant after 19 years in California.
Her husband, Salvador, 42, a machine shop programmer in the movie industry, is also seeking a green card with his employer's support. For now, he said, he makes do with a work permit that must be renewed annually. The couple just bought a house, but they wonder whether the government will one day send them back to Mexico.
"I wish the people who are handling these cases could put themselves in the shoes of those of us who are waiting," he said.
Instead of empathy, the immigration agency is offering a fee increase. Fees for most applications will soon increase by $55 to $60, and henceforth be automatically adjusted for inflation. The cost of a citizenship application will increase to $320.
Immigrant advocates say the fee increases add insult to injury. "If this was a private operation, consumers would be outraged," said Karen Narasaki of the National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium. "But it's a government monopoly, the worst of all monopolies."
Immigration operations head Yates said there was no other alternative. "That fee increase is long overdue," he said. It "gets us to a point where we stop bleeding, we stop losing money on the cases we are adjudicating and we start digging into the backlogs."
Bush's 2005 budget proposes a $58-million increase that would bring immigration funding to $1.7 billion. But the president is also calling for a reduction in general fund dollars to the agency as those are replaced with receipts from higher fees.
It's going to be tough to get any more funding than that, Berman said. "By definition, people waiting to become U.S. citizens are not voters, and they are not constituents."
 
Re: AVM number

Tucxie75,

AVM Phone no.: 215-861-5286 (Sometimes it ring forever and after a while your call will go through).

Choose option #1 for Permanent Applications and the AVM will walk you through.

Please share your case details.

Regards

AwardMyGC


Originally posted by Tucxie75
Hi, Could someone give me the phone number to check cases through AVM?
Thanks,
Mary
 
srajuco, Good post!

srajuco,

Thanks for highligting the problems with employers. I am a latest victim of these greedy employers. But I am also looking for some kind of help from this board. In my case, I am going to complete my 6 years by April, now this happend. I have already applied 7th year extension and awaitng for approval. Meanwhile, I requested many times to sponsor me, but they did not care.
I do not know what to do. I have waited almost 3 years and spent hard earned money now being wasted.

If anyone can give some ideas how to stop this kind of unfair, I would be greatly appreciated.

Thx, krivis

[Guys, I have a question of Labor certification. My employer makes employees pay for their Green cards. Recently I saw that a guy 'A' got his labor approved though my employer.
The employer saw an opportunity for a project and found a suitable candidate 'B' whom he hired with a promise of fast green card processing. With 'B' he is getting lot more money in comission compared to 'A'. Educational qualifications for both 'A' and 'B' are similar. Looking at labor delays 'B' wanted to leave unless employer arranged for preapproved labor and did substitution. Now my employer played a game and fired 'A' while he was still on project and used his approved labor for 'B'. I want to help 'A', since he paid almost $3,000 towards lawyer fees and application fees, waited for four years, is about 4/5 months away from getting his 140 approved, and now has to leave without anything to start allover again at any other employer. Is there a provision where he can get the approved labor application ported alongwith him or cancel it and not let the employer misuse it?]
:mad:
 
regarding latest approvals

Hi Guntur,
Did any of these 5 cases got any questions/queries from the Delaware SESA? Its surprising to hear that the application recieved in DOL in march got approved. Please tell us any more details you have about these cases.

Mine is from Delaware. Last month or early this month, Delaware SESA requested for more details on the recruitment efforts(they asked for the resumes of the candidates our company interviewed) and the lawer had submitted those in mid of march.
 
no reply yet

Hi AwardMyGC :

I did not hear antyhing from DOL. Infact I Called and left another message for the person supposed to be processing my case, but he/she didn't call me back.

AVM has same old message "NOF time extension granted ....."

Pinkubenu



Originally posted by AwardMyGC
pinkubenu,

Did you hear anything back from DOL? What is your case status?

AwardMyGC
 
Re: no reply yet

Hi pinkubenu,

I wonder, what they're doing? When you spoke to them last week, did they give you time line on when they're going to process it? One thing I don't understand is the way the LC applications are processed. NON-RIR LC application with the receipt date range of January through May still pending, but on numerous occasion I say LC application received after July got approved. Talk about RIR applicants with the date range from May through August still pending, but most of the application received after August through till date are getting certified. What’s your deliberation on this aspect?

Does anyone have any input?

Regards

AwardMyGC


Originally posted by pinkubenu
Hi AwardMyGC :

I did not hear antyhing from DOL. Infact I Called and left another message for the person supposed to be processing my case, but he/she didn't call me back.

AVM has same old message "NOF time extension granted ....."

Pinkubenu
 
Re: Re: no reply yet

Hi,
Just wanted to share this news with you guys...
I filed for labor clearance in sept/2001!!!, it finally cleared state and went to federal labor, federal then issues a additional 1 day reqruitment effort, the attorney sent the requested douments in Jan 2004, last week I requested for case status and the attorney sent a mail to INS...find below the reply from INS

-----------------------------------------------------------
We are currently processing all applications for labor certification as efficiently as possible. Should we need any additional information we will contact by mail. Your patience will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

-------------------------------------------------------------

how efficient is "as efficiently as possible" :-(


Originally posted by AwardMyGC
Hi pinkubenu,

I wonder, what they're doing? When you spoke to them last week, did they give you time line on when they're going to process it? One thing I don't understand is the way the LC applications are processed. NON-RIR LC application with the receipt date range of January through May still pending, but on numerous occasion I say LC application received after July got approved. Talk about RIR applicants with the date range from May through August still pending, but most of the application received after August through till date are getting certified. What’s your deliberation on this aspect?

Does anyone have any input?

Regards

AwardMyGC
 
Re: Re: no reply yet

Hi AwardMyGC :

The person I spoke to was not handling my case. What the person told me is that cases are assigned to certain analyst and then it totally depends upon him/her how he handles the cases. Seems like they do their work at ad-hoc basis.

No the person did not give me any timeline.

Thanks,
pinkubenu


Originally posted by AwardMyGC
Hi pinkubenu,

I wonder, what they're doing? When you spoke to them last week, did they give you time line on when they're going to process it? One thing I don't understand is the way the LC applications are processed. NON-RIR LC application with the receipt date range of January through May still pending, but on numerous occasion I say LC application received after July got approved. Talk about RIR applicants with the date range from May through August still pending, but most of the application received after August through till date are getting certified. What’s your deliberation on this aspect?

Does anyone have any input?

Regards

AwardMyGC
:( :(
 
Re: Re: Re: no reply yet

sunkav,

Could you please share your case information?
Is it RIR/NON-RIR? What State,DOT Code,Receipt Date, RFE Date & Responded Date?

AwardMyGC.

Originally posted by sunkav
Hi,
Just wanted to share this news with you guys...
I filed for labor clearance in sept/2001!!!, it finally cleared state and went to federal labor, federal then issues a additional 1 day reqruitment effort, the attorney sent the requested douments in Jan 2004, last week I requested for case status and the attorney sent a mail to INS...find below the reply from INS

-----------------------------------------------------------
We are currently processing all applications for labor certification as efficiently as possible. Should we need any additional information we will contact by mail. Your patience will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

-------------------------------------------------------------

how efficient is "as efficiently as possible" :-(
 
Puzzled

I have been through the SESA and I am now at the DOL in Philly. However, when I requested my case number to my lawyer, he said he did not received it yet. Would you have an idea why? I thought you would get a case number from the SESA and move it on to the DOL.
I wanted to check my status on the AVM but I can't without this number (my employer's number doesn't seem to exist).
Thank you for any information,
Tucxie
 
Re: Puzzled

It wil take nealry a month + to receive the case # from Phily ater it moved from SESA, you can check with AVM using your employers phone #


Originally posted by Tucxie75
I have been through the SESA and I am now at the DOL in Philly. However, when I requested my case number to my lawyer, he said he did not received it yet. Would you have an idea why? I thought you would get a case number from the SESA and move it on to the DOL.
I wanted to check my status on the AVM but I can't without this number (my employer's number doesn't seem to exist).
Thank you for any information,
Tucxie
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top