nohope_for_lc
Registered Users (C)
I like your idea
Send this suggestion to PBEC.They may like it also.We should do something that will be helpful for all of us.If all members of this forum send a letter with this suggestion to PBEC they may consider it.
Send this suggestion to PBEC.They may like it also.We should do something that will be helpful for all of us.If all members of this forum send a letter with this suggestion to PBEC they may consider it.
triniti said:I agree with the suggestion of implementing an expedited premium processing for labor. Now, it may be very hard to implement this because a lot of people may respond (they were able to do it with H1's though). But then again, they may establish a premium queue. They may charge some extra $$'s to get you into the expedited queue. If they guarantee my labor in 6 months, I would be willing to pay upto $5K. If you think about it, if 10K people chooses to do so, that would mean $50M. That means you can add almost 500 more people (assuming $100K salary/person). These people would work on the expedited queue first and then move to the normal queue. That way, those who do not have the resources to pay the $5K or do not wish to do so can benefit as well. The details might be figured out but like I said, I am ready to pay $5K cash right now if it will make me get my labor in 6 months. Time is very important for me because I have a wife who wants to work and I want to start enjoying the benefits of AC-21 portability as soon as possible and I want to mitigate the risk of a possible layoff. So, the benefits more than outweigh the $5K. This point I think should be brought up in discussions and suggestions to the senators.
Also, why don't they still have a case status web site? I understand that they have not completed data entry yet but that's OK (well, it is not ok but what can I say). For those people, the status might just say not in the system yet or whatever. What are they waiting for? The problem I think is that, as has been mentioned before, they have skipped a lot of 2001 and early 2002 cases and they still are not able to process FIFO and they don't want this to be out in the open.