pani_6 said:Dol has a date for Sept07 to meet the dealine....They have cases from 2002 non rir cases to process
so
Jul-Dec06 --6months
Jan-Sept-09 months..
So I am assuming that 2002 and 2003 cases need to be done by Dec 06 and 2004-05 cases by Sept07.....
Dec 06--at least cases of Mid 2003 certified
MArch07-at least all mid 2004 cases certfied
This may be a optimistic estimate given DOL efficiency in the past....
Any comments??.......
csrini1 said:Hope only for those, whose cases have been transferred to Regional, before going to BPC's. for cases transferred from state to BPC, screwed is the word i guess...
i don't want to be pessimist but waiting from 2002, and collegues from 2001.
labor_headache said:Can I ask why is it that a labor transferred to the BEC from Regional is better than one directly from the State?
My PD is Feb 03 (NJ, non-RIR) and the 45-day letter was received in Sept 05. I think my case got transferred to the BEC without going to Regional. Does that put my case at a disadvantage compared to the ones that have been through the Regional center.
Your response is appreciated.
labordrags said:It doesnot matter if or no your case being transfered to BEC from DOL or SWA. The only thing is if your case has prior advertisement done or no. They are treating NONRIR case as RIR if the ad being conducted in the past, and being given to SWA.
labordrags said:It doesnot matter if or no your case being transfered to BEC from DOL or SWA. The only thing is if your case has prior advertisement done or no. They are treating NONRIR case as RIR if the ad being conducted in the past, and being given to SWA.
cuaderno said:Is everybody's info on this tracker?
http://www.trackins.com/immigrationtrackers/dallas-backlog-tracker/
I found only one NON-RIR case got certified so far.
as far as i know, and to knowledge, bpc will not ask employer to do the advtsmt, they will do it themselves and send the resumes to employer to screen and send the results back to them, but this is not official though...labor_headache said:Folks-
Can someone please shed some light on the below questions regarding Traditional Labor Processing by the BECs -
(1) How long does it generally take for the BEC to issue a recruitment letter after the 45-day letter?
(2) How long does the recruitment step take?
(3) How long after the recruitment step does the labor get approved by the BEC?
(4) Since the BECs have a mandate of clearing the backlog by Sept 07, how would they force the employers to finish the recuitment in due time?
csrini1 said:as far as i know, and to knowledge, bpc will not ask employer to do the advtsmt, they will do it themselves and send the resumes to employer to screen and send the results back to them, but this is not official though...
labor_headache said:
Anyways, perhaps there is some confusion between RIR and non-RIR with respect to who carries out the recruitment. It think it is important to clarify this confusion. Reason being - if the employer is to expect some kind of a letter from the BEC requesting recruitment for the NON-RIR cases, then this would be a good event to track.
labor_headache said:Folks-
Can someone please shed some light on the below questions regarding Traditional Labor Processing by the BECs -
(1) How long does it generally take for the BEC to issue a recruitment letter after the 45-day letter?
I have not seen any particular LC being called for the recuritment so far, or not to my knowledge any member of this portal community has posted their story of how BECs asks for the recu in lieu of 45 days letter.
(2) How long does the recruitment step take?
Not sure, as none of the member as far as I know of, posted out their info if or any.
(3) How long after the recruitment step does the labor get approved by the BEC?
No idea yet. We need to wait and see how backlog centers plan in doing the recu.
(4) Since the BECs have a mandate of clearing the backlog by Sept 07, how would they force the employers to finish the recuitment in due time?
Just my thought, BECs may ask for the employer to publish ad. OR as the Philly it self is publishing advertisement in american job bank, but some of the ad there exist for more than 2 months, so looking at this, I would think 2 month recu is well enough.
http://www.jobsearch.org/seeker/jobsearch/keyword?action=seeker_search_process&JobSearch_pageLink=3
csrini1 said:labordrags, can you shed more light on ur source of info. bcos there are 1000's of remanded cases(meaning initially filed as RIR, meaning advtmts already one, went to regional, but sent back to SWA again, from 2001,2002) still waiting to see the day of light....
:: As I browse this forum in regular basis, the first hit was done by user ASHTON KUTCHER. His was a case with TWC, was Non RIR, and being certified. His case was not in a state, but was in region. I think he falls under 245(i). So, even if it is a NON RIR, as he was done with ad stuff, his LC was certified in this ground.
http://www.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?p=1109578#post1109578
on a personal note, i think it makes sense for BPC's to process remanded cases also as RIR, transferred from dol, rather than state, and come back to these cases. i believe they can't deferentiate until they physically open each and every file and see if it is a remanded case from dol or purely a SWA case, meaning never went to DOL.
::Remanded cases being treated as RIR, we have many people whose LC was kicked back by region saw their approval. Prime example would be Texancanadian.
http://www.immigrationportal.com/showpost.php?p=1270447&postcount=169
to answer labor-headache, it is easy for bpc to decide on cases pending at dol, at the time of transfer, so bpc have been working on ONLY cases transferred from dol, so that they can show to the management, what they accomplished, and ask for a raise/extension till 2010??(my thoughts only...)
::I dont have any sisters or brothers work for BECs. I have been waiting for the past few years to see light on my LC. I know it is taking way long time, and their promises of eliminating backlog has never been a success in a given time period. But I think what they are saying of Sept 07, I strongly believe that they will be succeeded in their projection. By establishing these centers, they have gain a lot of work that needed to be done by either SWA or DOL in the past. Their efficiency being quesitoned as I wanted to know myself too, but their work ethics - I truely believe that they are working their ass off in making the deadline to clear the backlog.
kalifornia_resi said:This is what I saw on Mathew Oh's site today.
* BEC has today disclosed that they have completed dataentries for the entire 365 applications and all the 45-day letters will be sent out within this week.
* Beginning from the mid-July 2006, the BECs will start sending out the recruitment instructions to the employers whose traditional regular labor certification applications have been pending at the Backlog Elimination Centers. In order to speed up the process, the BEC will enclosed with the instructions their prevailing wage determination which the employers will have to use for the purpose of the recruitment. The prevailing wage determination will reflect the prevailing wage at the time recruitment and not the wage at the time of initial filing no matter how long they were filed. Besides, the employers must offer 100% of the prevailing wage in compliance with the new federal law on the prevailing wage for the labor certification.
* Employers, watch for these mails from the Backlog Elimination Centers from next week!