Jayoa is right, when i went to do my FP the ASC was empty. The employees told me that the whole week was like that. I did my FP in 10 min. One reason that the FP is scheduled a week or two is because the appointments have to reach the ASC in their internal system. When FP is done they have to again upload all that info in their systems and also send it the old fashioned way back to USCIS.
reason they schedule these things weeks away is to provide applicants enough time to prepare for their appointment. It will be unreasonable to schedule anyone for the day after you receive your letter or just a few days away even though the ASCs may be empty. They mention that all appointments are scheduled at least two weeks away on their information details I read on their publication. So its up to you to be ready to go in as soon as you get your letter.
There's a reason why USCIS schedules applicants at a specific time: it allows for order of the FP process. Also, not all ASCs allow early walk ins. Simply attempting an early FP walk in for no other reason amounts to skipping the line ahead of others.Anyone with a fingerprint/biometrics letter should go for the walk-in process as soon as you receive it, you don't have to wait for the scheduled date.
There's a reason why USCIS schedules applicants at a specific time: it allows for order of the FP process. Also, not all ASCs allow early walk ins. Simply attempting an early FP walk in for no other reason amounts to skipping the line ahead of others.
There's an order (line) to the way they schedule FPs; that's why they have a date/time on the FP letter. With your logic, it's perfectly ok for someone to do an early walk in for no other reason than thinking their case will be processed faster. If everyone used your logic, the ASCs would be chaotic as applicants would go for their FP outside of their normal schedule, which typically means m-f/8-5. Walk ins are at the discretion of the ASC staff based on availability and/or individual ASC rules.You mean skipping a line where there is none?
There's an order (line) to the way they schedule FPs; that's why they have a date/time on the FP letter. With your logic, it's perfectly ok for someone to do an early walk in for no other reason than thinking their case will be processed faster. If everyone used your logic, the ASCs would be chaotic as applicants would go for their FP outside of their normal schedule, which typically means m-f/8-5. Walk ins are at the discretion of the ASC staff based on availability and/or individual ASC rules.
No point of trying to discuss this any further with such a statement.There would be no difference if everyone did a walk-in ..
No point of trying to discuss this any further with such a statement.
Of course, we are all here sharing our experiences, opinions, speculations, and understanding of the whole process to comfort ourselves and calm our fears through the process. Unless you are an attorney, you know no more than anyone else here and I will not advise anyone to take any advise here or on any immigration forum as final but to do their research in actual law books.
I posted two questions I know nothing about but have read others' speculate about and you can't help to answer it since you know so much, here it is again, maybe you missed it before and perhaps you also know the internal workings of the USCIS;
I am currently 2 years and 10 months into my green card and married with kids to a USC. I have done everything up to biometrics within two weeks of the N400 application. The question is; will my application be held until it is fully three years before it is transfered to the DO for me to even get an interview? Or will they insure that my Oath happens after the full three years?
Many here have speculated that they hold applications until the full term (3yrs or 5yrs) before they transfer it to the DO.
Like mahd4 said, there have been numerous applicants who have reported being interviewed before the full term, either after their case was transferred to DO, or without their case having been transferred to DO . It's not set in stone in USCIS whether you will or will not be interviewed before your full term is met. There even have been a few applicants who reported that the IO canceled their interview for a later date since they didn't reach the term date. However, one thing is certain: you will have to wait until after your term is reached in order to perform the oath.I am currently 2 years and 10 months into my green card and married with kids to a USC. I have done everything up to biometrics within two weeks of the N400 application. The question is; will my application be held until it is fully three years before it is transfered to the DO for me to even get an interview? Or will they insure that my Oath happens after the full three years?
Many here have speculated that they hold applications until the full term (3yrs or 5yrs) before they transfer it to the DO.
Like mahd4 said, there have been numerous applicants who have reported being interviewed before the full term, either after their case was transferred to DO, or without their case having been transferred to DO . It's not set in stone in USCIS whether you will or will not be interviewed before your full term is met. There even have been a few applicants who reported that the IO canceled their interview for a later date since they didn't reach the term date. However, one thing is certain: you will have to wait until after your term is reached in order to perform the oath.
Before an applicant can be naturalized via oath, certain basic requirements (outlined in 8 CFR 316, INA 316, 8 USC 1427) must be met, including continuous residency. If you don't meet one of the requirements, you can't be naturalized..simple as that.While I appreciate your response, I would like to know if there is somewhere I can confirm this statement?; "However, one thing is certain: you will have to wait until after your term is reached in order to perform the oath."