Cool Mint
is your application was based on Asylum? . thanks
Yes, my application was based on asylum. Approved by IJ in 2007 and I applied for 485 in 2008. Anyone?
Cool Mint
is your application was based on Asylum? . thanks
fidan, one of my compatriots actually returned back to COP after his mom's death while on hold. Not suggesting you to do the same but just sharing a personal experience, that's all.
Thank you for the well wishes. Well what are you going to do if you receive a mail "inadvertently". Simply saying sorry is not enough to cover their mistakes like naming someone "terrorist suspect". I do feel like how lightly they can change their views. Your 212 tag is no other than "inadvertent mistake" too. I recall that I received that 212 letter after I made phone inquiry on my case and the lady rep who answered my call was "super rude" and took my interview over the phone.
I hope this bs will stop soon and everyone will be freed. I am confident that no one sould not give up or withdraw their application. Someone asked me here how my 212 letter became "inadvertent mistake of USCIS". Let me say what my attorney did:
1. Initially suggested to go for Mandamus but later withdrew that decision.
2. Applied for a waiver of Inadmissibility (based on Memorandum of March 13, 2009); someone posted this memorandum in this forum.
3. Sent the Waiver of Inadmissibility documents to 3 places: DHS, USCIS, and Local Congressman
4. Made appointment with Local Congressman and took me to the office physically--spoke with rep
5. Then inquiries and orders issued by the Congressional office forced USCIS to re open the file.
Immidiate response arrived from USCIS.
1st letter, removing hold
2nd letter, reversing the decision to deny travel document(which was done earlier)
Waiting for 6 months (but with confident of not being tagged as suspect)
Guys, please move on with the common action. Follow up with lawyer Thomas. I am with you all.
Guys please answer me, thank you. How is it possible that my case in on hold on 212 after my finger print and name check are clear?