How to Report "Adjourned in Contemplation of Dismissal (ACD)" case on N-400 Form?

Correct. However, there's a very clear distinction between a criminal conviction and a civil conviction.

Question 18 is: Have you ever been convicted of a crime or offense?


Is a traffic violation an offense?
 
Bobsmyth, I am just confused in all this terminology. Is saying "I am not Guilty" means "enetering a plea" too? Or does term "entering plea" refers only to "Guily" "No contest" etc.

thx.

In this context (for the determination of deferred adjudication ) it must involve a plea of guilty or no contest. You wouldn't be eligible for deferred adjudication if you plead not guilty and the evidence is sufficient to convict you of the offense.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not unless it is criminal in nature.

So Question 17 ("Have you ever been charged with committing any crime or offense") should exclude traffic ticket too?

Only Question 16 need to consider traffic tickets because it says
"for any reason" rather than "for any crime or offense".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So Question 17 ("Have you ever been charged with committing any crime or offense") should exclude traffic ticket too?

Only Question 16 need to consider traffic tickets because it says
"for any reason" rather thn a"for any crime or offense".

Correct. If you want to get really technical, a traffic ticket is a violation.
 
Good thing they don't have a question of " Have you ever been violated before?" on N-400..we'd be discussing the difference between traffic tickets and being someone's b#$% in prison.:D
 
After reading up further on deferred adjudication, I don't think it applies to your case since you never entered a plea. So for question 19 the answer would be NO since no plea or admission of guilt was ever entered in court. The key words to question 19 is "sentencing" and "probation", both of which require a plea to be entered in the court .


http://www.texasbar.com/Template.cf...EMPLATE=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm
Could the fact that the OP agreed to pay restitution not count as an implicit admission of guilt?
 
Here is the original words that define conviction for immigration purpose
(I am not sure if case of withheld judgment,do (i) and (ii) both have to be there or not,)

8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)

(48)
(A) The term “conviction” means, with respect to an alien, a formal judgment of guilt of the alien entered by a court or, if adjudication of guilt has been withheld, where—
(i) a judge or jury has found the alien guilty or the alien has entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or has admitted sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilt, and
(ii) the judge has ordered some form of punishment, penalty, or restraint on the alien’s liberty to be imposed.
 
IMO, yes since "withheld judgement" normally involves some kind of penalty or probation based on a plea entered other than non guilty.
 
Here is the original words that define conviction for immigration purpose
(I am not sure if case of withheld judgment,do (i) and (ii) both have to be there or not,)

8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)

(48)
(A) The term “conviction” means, with respect to an alien, a formal judgment of guilt of the alien entered by a court or, if adjudication of guilt has been withheld, where—
(i) a judge or jury has found the alien guilty or the alien has entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or has admitted sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilt, and
(ii) the judge has ordered some form of punishment, penalty, or restraint on the alien’s liberty to be imposed.

So, I paid restitution. To me, that seems to fit the definition of a "form of punishment, penalty, or restraint on the alien’s liberty to be imposed."

Which means that by paying restitution, I am now convicted by the USCIS definition. Am I understanding this correctly?

Thanks for looking up the law, WBH.
 
So, I paid restitution. To me, that seems to fit the definition of a "form of punishment, penalty, or restraint on the alien’s liberty to be imposed."

Which means that by paying restitution, I am now convicted by the USCIS definition. Am I understanding this correctly?

Thanks for looking up the law, WBH.

No, since you never entered a plea.
 
Aren't ACD cases supposed to be expunged after two years or so provided that the person has not been involved in any other mess?


Stoned!
 
Aren't ACD cases supposed to be expunged after two years or so provided that the person has not been involved in any other mess?


Stoned!

The timeframe for ACD expungement probably varies from state to state. In New York, the case is expunged after 6 months.
 
Aren't ACD cases supposed to be expunged after two years or so provided that the person has not been involved in any other mess?


Stoned!

Expungement does not matter much for imigration purpose. Maybe it can make things worse if expungement means you can not even get your own
certified court record.

Only a presidential pardon can make a difference if you really can
influence Obama to do so.
 
Expungement does not matter much for imigration purpose. Maybe it can make things worse if expungement means you can not even get your own
certified court record.

That only holds true for a conviction as defined by immigration law.
 
That only holds true for a conviction as defined by immigration law.

It does not make much difference either when there is no conviction.

If there is a conviction, expungement does not make it look better.
If there is no conviction, no expungment does not make it look worse.

And if you tell USCIS there is no conviction, and they want to see court documents to confirm.
You have to provide certified court docuemnts. If it is expunged before you get a copy of certified
court record, you may have trouble getting it if it is expunged.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My point was that an expunged conviction must be disclosed and can effect the outcome of an application, whereas an expunged ACD (when it's not defined as a conviction by immigration law) does not have an effect on your application since you don't need to disclose it.
 
Top