Re: Re: Re: A true Westerner (Canadian)
Originally posted by patienceGC
But as far as education goes, I dont know about other countries but school and undergrad college education is pretty good in India.
Well, I learn something new every day. I'll confess right now, much of my knowledge of foreign educational systems is anecdotal, and I'm being called on that right now. What you mention struck a chord, since it's similar to what I did.
A number of my peers went to prominent (and not so prominent) US universities for their undergraduate degrees. I took the opinion that a Canadian undergraduate degree would be quite similar to a US one, and the price was SUBSTANTIALLY lower. From what you say, an Indian undergrad can be quite similar. (To temporarily segue into outsourcing, if an Indian can provide a broadly similar amount and quality of work for a much lower price, it's a no brainer as well.)
I never got a graduate degree because my undergrad was in History, not a technical discipline, and I agree with the author John Irving that the grad in grad school stands for "gradual" - you keep going to school until gradually you discover that you don't want to school anymore.
There's one belief I have about a First World education that also may not be borne out by facts, but I'd like to throw it out for you to consider and enlighten me. A common (mis?)conception many westerners have about Asian cultures and educations is their emphasis on rote learning versus a broader, tool-based education. I don't think that's the right term, but it's essentially giving students the tools needed to create a solution to any problem they may encounter.
I'm not actually trained formally in any programming language or discipline; I learned the elements of structured programming while still in high school, and by the time I got to college I was proficient in C and x86 assembler. Learning some silly teaching language was a step backwards and I never pursued CS.
What I did learn was analytic thought, communication and requirements gathering. I learned to study business processes and anticipate client needs, which I think are more valuable in many cases than pure coding talent and proficiency. These things are significantly harder to do from 10 time zones away.
I guess what I am trying to say is that I believe that a Third World education can be significantly more "rigid", and as business require new thinking to gain a competetive advantage, this becomes more and more of an asset. Does this seem broadly accurate? Yes, I know that there are plenty of unimaginative, poorly skilled US-trained folks, and they by and large are the victims of offshoring.