DQ, because as I believe has been explained a number of times before, everyone is “equally current” once you are all current (and again this question is essentially meaningless anyway unless you are both at the same consulate). If you are all current the entire point is that visas are available for everyone below the cutoff. I don’t really understand why this is even an issue. To turn your question around, if someone takes three months after KCC sends a document request to send in their docs and therefore becomes DQ later than someone else who responded quickly, if they are both current is it still “fair” that the sloppy one gets an interview first?
I am not sure I agree, Susie
The order of DS260 should be the only one set by the lottery itself (which is the draft order).
This is, what has been adamantly said, on this forum, until weeks ago (aside for the initial backlog, which makes sense, btw).
Of course, KCC encourages the immediate submittal of the DS260, but it does not specify or hints that the submittal date establishes an order of processing . KCC encourages a timely submittal, so they are not overwhelmed later in the FY.
There could be other reasons (than being sloppy), to wait for the DS260 submittal and the documents submittal (e.g. to get the forms right in the first place, or to have the time to obtain the documents, which can differ from country to country).
Perhaps that delay was due to diligence, rather than sloppiness, when ds260 are submitted say in July and documents submitted soon after (we are talking about months prior the FY even starts...).
Now, what we see is that the order "appears" to be based on DS260 submittal date only.
So if somebody (regardless the CN) may have submitted a sloppy ds260, say on May 11th (and then unlocked for corrections and resubmitted), he has more possibilities of who waited a few days or weeks to get a straight, correct and clean ds260 submittal. At one point, in 2022, all regions will be current and the early submitters will be ahead of the game anyway.
Let's wait and see.