hmm ok Steve, so I may have missed an earlier post from you but from what you have just written in regards to only completing year 11, followed by a year at TAFE - this is a concern.
I can give you information on how my interview went and you can make your own informed decision with that - Like you I also only completed year 11, I however did not complete a year of TAFE after that. Later in life I completed a Bachelors Degree and (not that it's relevant to my DV interview but I was partway through my Masters Degree when I interviewed).
Like you, I was unsure if my education would be enough so I also prepared a case for work experience, I have a job that has an SVP Range 7.0 to < 8.0 - happy to provide further details on what I put together for this.
On my interview day I had all my requested documents as well as my University Transcript for my Bachelors Degree and all the documents I had collected to support my work experience case. The CO reviewed all my documents, looked at my degree documents and all my work experience stuff - he put my degree aside and went through everything else, grilled me about my job, my experience, skills, how long I worked at various places throughout my career. He then approved my case.
So my degree meant nothing to him, as far as he was concerned I did not have a year 12 leaving certificate from an Australian High School.
FWIW, I also completed high school in QLD in the 80s so I am more than familiar with how it all works
I would be more than willing to help you with reviewing your work experience stuff to see if you can qualify on that, you say your skills match a higher SVP Range, If I were you, I'd be putting my effort into strengthening that case and not nit picking the minutiae of the FAM rulings
Aidyn
Thank you for your reply.
That you were eligible to APPLY for university admission despite only completing year 11 high school may prove my interpretation of the the FAM.
As you are familiar with the Qld high school system, particularly in the 1980’s, you know it was the Senior Certificate that was issued up until 2007 and now replaced by the Qld Certificate of Education (QCE) to those who completed year 12 in Qld, and if you wanted to APPLY to enter university you needed a Tertiary Entrance score (TE score) on your Senior Certificate (up to 1989) replaced by an Overall Position number (OP number) on your Senior Certificate or QCE up to 2019 and replaced now with an Australian Tertiary Admission Rank (ATAR) number Australia wide on ALL year 12 certificates issued anywhere in Australia.
You obviously don’t have a TE, OP or ATAR as you only completed year 11, yet you APPLIED to enter and was accepted at (presumably an Australian) University, and successfully completed a Masters Degree.
The FAM does NOT say the foreign education is equivalent to a US high school education only if you successfully complete 12 years of a foreign education because a US high school education is 12 years.
What the FAM says is as the 12 year US high school education is sufficient to allow the student to APPLY for college admission, for the foreign education to be equivalent to the US high school education the foreign education “should” (not must) also allow the student to APPLY for college admission.
The FAM does NOT say the foreign education is equivalent to the US education only if it is for the same length of time (12 years) as the US education, nor does the FAM say you must be accepted for college admission, it only says you must be eligible to APPLY for college admission.
As I said previously, I now need a ruling from the Sydney consulate if the term “college admission” in the FAM, when talking about a foreign equivalent education, means admission to a US college only, or, for an Australian DV selectee being interviewed at the Sydney consulate, an Australian college/university. If the answer from the Sydney consulate is an Australian university, then I believe your education Aidyn qualified you for your DV, even if the CO didn’t know or believed it, as your education allowed you to APPLY for university admission in Australia even though you didn’t complete year 12 high school education in Australia.
One sure way to find out what the CO decided qualified you for your DV is to FOIA the US state department on your DV case, it may have been your education qualified you as well, without the CO actually saying it to you.
If you APPLIED for admission to a QUEENSLAND university for your Masters Degree, and you obviously didn’t have a TE, OP or ATAR, you must have had your pre university education assessed for a QTAC rank number, as, as far as I understand it, there would be no other way for you to apply for admission.
Qld University course admission requirements have the minimum TE, OP or ATAR you must have to be able to apply for admission for that university course. The only other option I’m aware of is if you have a QTAC rank number which are also listed on university course admission application requirements.
That’s why QTAC have been offering QTAC rank numbers for the last 30 years, for people like you and I who don’t have a TE, OP or ATAR because we didn’t complete year 12 high school.
With my work experience case, it’s a case that my job title may be insufficient as there is no listing on O*Net of my job title and the closest job title to my job title is 6.0-<7.0 SVP (personally I think O*Net has set the bar very high for many job titles) but my job duties match job duties in other job titles with 7.0> SVP.
The reason for this is I, like many Australians, negotiated my own salary and workplace agreement with my employer rather than accept the award wage and Union BS associated with awards, and with my salary came more money, but with more hours with extra duties.
My concerns when arguing a work experience case are will the CO rely more on the job title than job duties and if the CO refuses the education argument and places the case on AP and contacts my employer for further information, my employer will realise I am planing to leave the company and terminate my employment to avoid financial obligations that have been negotiated in my contract that can only be negated if I were, for example, fired. It’s a sad reality of life. How many women have made the mistake of privately telling a work collegue they were trying to fall pregnant, only to be suddenly fired for “poor performance” so the employer didn’t have to pay maternity leave?
Not so much a problem if the DV is granted, but if the DV is refused I would end up unemployed as well.
Obviously I will make submissions my education qualifies me for the DVD, and if the Sydney consulate says in writing the college admission requirement in the FAM is for a US college, I will follow Susie’s advice and try to find a US college who will confirm my Australian education allows me to APPLY for admission with them. If your can convince the CO you qualify for the DV on education you shouldn’t even need to mention your employment.
Can you say how long your interview went for and the questions the CO asked, particularly about education and employment ? did you have your year 11 transcripts at your interview? Mine took months for my old Brisbane high school to locate, as they were not electronically stored and were in a 1980’s archive box in Government storage, and even then were only photocopies so the high school had to create an original transcript on their letterhead signed by the principle in ink as a correct record. The QCAA only keeps the now obsolete year 10 Junior Certificate and year 12 Senior Certificate/QCE replacements. Anything else, such as year 11 transcripts must be obtained from the individual high school if you don’t have your originals.
I’m single and have around 70k in my bank account plus around 150k in easily sellable assets (assets I physically cannot take to the US) so I’m aasuming there shouldn’t be a public charge concern with me.