• Hello Members, This forums is for DV lottery visas only. For other immigration related questions, please go to our forums home page, find the related forum and post it there.

DV 2021 ALL SELECTEES

lyleuz said:
thanks Susie, i’l email them then. and with the case move it means as well that we need to do our medical exam in Romania only right?
Click to expand...
I believe so yes - look also for the Romania specific instructions on the web page dealing with preparing for interview (there is s link to the list of consulates)
 
lyleuz said:
Hello again! we are from Uzbekistan and by luck Romania accepted our transfer (no ties), they have processed our application from KCC and we got the 2NL. My concern now though is we recently have our new born, we filled in his DS260 as additional applicant and submitted his supporting documents as well to KCC.but in our 2NL his name is not mentioned. though as the main applicant I did not unlock my DS260 form and edit children as i thought it will not be possible after submission of the form. Should we take our new born with us to our Interview even if his name is not mentioned in 2NL ?will this be a possible problem ?
Click to expand...
Congrats!
 
#GOH update :

Final hearing date was moved from July 13th to July 19th 2021. I believe Goodluck and Flizapovich will also have hearings on the same day. However, Goh is the only case with summary judgement. The other 2 cases are on the preliminary injunctive track.

I wonder if this means that Goh will be the first to get a final order from Judge Mehta?
 
Hi Anyone
Got Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia US embassy scheduled interview?
Right now I only check 6 people and 1 person in OC at KLL so little.
Case around AS3300,I'm waiting for my case 9xxx plus to schedule at KLL so long.
Please advise me,should I go for a lawsuit and which lawyer is better as well?
Thanks.
 
PhantomHigh said:
#GOH update :

Final hearing date was moved from July 13th to July 19th 2021. I believe Goodluck and Flizapovich will also have hearings on the same day. However, Goh is the only case with summary judgement. The other 2 cases are on the preliminary injunctive track.

I wonder if this means that Goh will be the first to get a final order from Judge Mehta?
Click to expand...
I would assume that Mehta is probably trying to decide on what to do for all 3 of them. Otherwise he wouldn't have pushed Goh to July 19th.

That's what Curtis said:

"It says the hearing is on all pending motions in all 3 of those referenced cases, so the answer is complicated. The Goh case is on summary judgment track instead of preliminary injunctive track, but the other 2 cases have motions for preliminary injunction pending."
 
Hi ! My name is Hernán, I am from Uruguay and I was selected in the 2021 diversity visa program.
On Monday the KCC emailed me to send my supporting documents and they told me it takes 3-6 weeks to respond.
I wanted to know if once that time interval has passed, do you already send me an email with the date of my interview?
Thanks
 
puda said:
I would assume that Mehta is probably trying to decide on what to do for all 3 of them. Otherwise he wouldn't have pushed Goh to July 19th.

That's what Curtis said:

"It says the hearing is on all pending motions in all 3 of those referenced cases, so the answer is complicated. The Goh case is on summary judgment track instead of preliminary injunctive track, but the other 2 cases have motions for preliminary injunction pending."
Click to expand...
I get that. But what about when judge Mehta grants a PI for other cases? I assume Goh will get a final order right?

Because from what I understand is that a Preliminary Injunction is just preliminary and needs further briefing until a judge makes a final order unlike Goh case which was out already for a summary judgement and expecting final order after 19th?

Can anyone explain?
@Britsimon
@SusieQQQ
@Sm1smom
 
Hi All! Me and my wife are going to the interview on the 21st of July. I have been a bit mislead by various sources about how the travel back and forth between my home country and the US works in terms of abandonment of the status. I thought, that for the first 1-2 years it is more or less okay to be away for longer periods of time, but what I have read in the past days indicates, that you can get questioned even if you left for less than 180 days.
We seriously plan to move permanently to the US, but we have a lot of things to take care of and we would probably be able to do the comfortable final move by the end of 2022 and we would like to maintain our current jobs until then, however we do not want to risk abandonment.
In case our interview is successful our visa will be valid until the 21st of December, we want to do the activation trip sometime between September - November, stay for a month and then return.
Below are my questions:

1. In your experience, how relaxed is CBP with fresh DV immigrants? Are they more understanding, or do they start to question your intentions right from the beginning?
2. Is it an acceptable approach to return with our temporary stamped ''green card'' to our current country after a month, then return with the stamped passport in let's say 160 days, stay for a month again, leave for another 160 days and then make the final move? Is it still within the tolerance level if I try to explain to the CBP officer that we were just let's say shutting down our current lives here which did not let me make any extra ties with the US (like keeping an employment, I will file my taxes though) and now we are here permanently?
3. I was considering applying for the re-entry permit, but I do not really want to stay away from the states for more than a year and the wait times for biometrics is extreme from what I hear now, which beats the purpose for us really, and I also don't mind saving 1300 dollars if it is not necessary to apply for it with this plan above. What do you think?

Thank you!
 
PhantomHigh said:
I get that. But what about when judge Mehta grants a PI for other cases? I assume Goh will get a final order right?

Because from what I understand is that a Preliminary Injunction is just preliminary and needs further briefing until a judge makes a final order unlike Goh case which was out already for a summary judgement and expecting final order after 19th?

Can anyone explain?
@Britsimon
@SusieQQQ
@Sm1smom
Click to expand...
No one can predict the outcome.
 
PhantomHigh said:
I get that. But what about when judge Mehta grants a PI for other cases? I assume Goh will get a final order right?

Because from what I understand is that a Preliminary Injunction is just preliminary and needs further briefing until a judge makes a final order unlike Goh case which was out already for a summary judgement and expecting final order after 19th?

Can anyone explain?
@Britsimon
@SusieQQQ
@Sm1smom
Click to expand...

I would not try and make assumptions based on the different filing strategies of each lawsuit.

I think the weakest part of Goodluck is the PI. The standard needed for a PI is proving that the plaintiffs will suffer irreparable harm without stopping the behavior of the defendants. Since some GL cases will be processed, you can only show that SOME of them will be harmed. Its tricky, and to some extent, already argued and lost.

That is not saying GL doesn't win. I expect GL and Goh to cause action on cases that would otherwise have timed out. And then some preservation of visas will be needed. That is likely to be needed for Goh plaintiffs and certain to be needed for GL.

In the same way, Goh could win without a summary judgement, but as I said, is likely to need a preservation of visas.
 
TSU said:
Hi All! Me and my wife are going to the interview on the 21st of July. I have been a bit mislead by various sources about how the travel back and forth between my home country and the US works in terms of abandonment of the status. I thought, that for the first 1-2 years it is more or less okay to be away for longer periods of time, but what I have read in the past days indicates, that you can get questioned even if you left for less than 180 days.
We seriously plan to move permanently to the US, but we have a lot of things to take care of and we would probably be able to do the comfortable final move by the end of 2022 and we would like to maintain our current jobs until then, however we do not want to risk abandonment.
In case our interview is successful our visa will be valid until the 21st of December, we want to do the activation trip sometime between September - November, stay for a month and then return.
Below are my questions:

1. In your experience, how relaxed is CBP with fresh DV immigrants? Are they more understanding, or do they start to question your intentions right from the beginning?
2. Is it an acceptable approach to return with our temporary stamped ''green card'' to our current country after a month, then return with the stamped passport in let's say 160 days, stay for a month again, leave for another 160 days and then make the final move? Is it still within the tolerance level if I try to explain to the CBP officer that we were just let's say shutting down our current lives here which did not let me make any extra ties with the US (like keeping an employment, I will file my taxes though) and now we are here permanently?
3. I was considering applying for the re-entry permit, but I do not really want to stay away from the states for more than a year and the wait times for biometrics is extreme from what I hear now, which beats the purpose for us really, and I also don't mind saving 1300 dollars if it is not necessary to apply for it with this plan above. What do you think?

Thank you!
Click to expand...

People (lawyers often) make a big deal about the 6 months. Frankly that is unfounded. There are many people (susieqqq included) that entered after 6 months with no problem. And you can also be found to have abandoned your status for absences of less than 6 months.

So absences of 6 to 12 months are technically different to absences of less than 6 months, but extremely unlikely to cause a problem.
 
Britsimon said:
People (lawyers often) make a big deal about the 6 months. Frankly that is unfounded. There are many people (susieqqq included) that entered after 6 months with no problem. And you can also be found to have abandoned your status for absences of less than 6 months.

So absences of 6 to 12 months are technically different to absences of less than 6 months, but extremely unlikely to cause a problem.
Click to expand...
Yep, it is one year that is an issue. In my opinion you’re likely to have less issue after just one longer absence say 10 months, than repeated say 5 month absences. “I had stuff to wrap up, now it’s done and I’m back for good” really only works once, coming back in and out again raises questions as to where you really live.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TSU
SusieQQQ said:
Yep, it is one year that is an issue. In my opinion you’re likely to have less issue after just one longer absence say 10 months, than repeated say 5 month absences. “I had stuff to wrap up, now it’s done and I’m back for good” really only works once, coming back in and out again raises questions as to where you really live.
Click to expand...
Thank you for the reply! So generally we'd be better off going for an activation, stay for a while, come back and return in 9-10 months to stay for good. I just really hope they won't send me back after I sell everything here and quit my job :D
Would going back with a soon to expire stamp at that point worsen my case, or they don't really care?
 
puda said:
No one can predict the outcome.
Click to expand...
Britsimon said:
I would not try and make assumptions based on the different filing strategies of each lawsuit.

I think the weakest part of Goodluck is the PI. The standard needed for a PI is proving that the plaintiffs will suffer irreparable harm without stopping the behavior of the defendants. Since some GL cases will be processed, you can only show that SOME of them will be harmed. Its tricky, and to some extent, already argued and lost.

That is not saying GL doesn't win. I expect GL and Goh to cause action on cases that would otherwise have timed out. And then some preservation of visas will be needed. That is likely to be needed for Goh plaintiffs and certain to be needed for GL.

In the same way, Goh could win without a summary judgement, but as I said, is likely to need a preservation of visas.
Click to expand...
Thank you @Britsimon @puda
 
Hello everyone, I just realized I missed out a zero in my title documents when I submitted my supporting documents in April.. I submitted it without being asked to by the way
Instead of 2021AF000XX… I wore 2021AF00XX…

should I send the supporting documents again?
Should I be worried?
 
Silvia Foxy said:
Hello everyone, I just realized I missed out a zero in my title documents when I submitted my supporting documents in April.. I submitted it without being asked to by the way
Instead of 2021AF000XX… I wore 2021AF00XX…

should I send the supporting documents again?
Should I be worried?
Click to expand...
At first l, I sent my docs without zeros at all.
Then shortly after, I resent my docs with full case numbers including leading zeros just as it appears on my 1NL.

That’s what I did.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top