SusieQQQ
Well-Known Member
Was there ever any representation made that the amount of plaintiffs would be limited, or did you just (initially) assume that the cost involved would make that happen?Look, it’s good to sound kind, be all-inclusive, talk about the equality of opportunity etc etc .. and it’s probably even more easy when you are already “on the other side of the ocean”. Why would not you? All I say is that this case is almost done due to the way Curtis accepted plaintiffs. And I don’t care if I sound harsh and my opinion is not popular here - at least several thousand could get visas (if the judge ruled so), in comparison to 24k who drowned it. Anyways, these discussions will not change anything and it’s ok to agree to disagree.
As a reminder - inclusivity is the raison d’etre of the DV program in the first place. And the American dream is all about equality of opportunity. If you don’t like these ideals, maybe the US is not for you?