• Hello Members, This forums is for DV lottery visas only. For other immigration related questions, please go to our forums home page, find the related forum and post it there.

DV 2017 OC Selectees

socialcasualty said:
[Hillary] is far less likely to cause major political upset globally and far less likely to reverse or hinder some of the incredible progressive moves that have been made in the US in recent years. I don't believe all Trump supporters are terrible people; far from it! But I've seen this election and some of his campaign strategies bring out the very worst in some people, and that breaks my heart. I disapprove of Trump's political agenda.
Click to expand...

socialcasualty said:
but feel that the progressiveness of the US that I've respected so greatly is going to come to a rather abrupt ending.
Click to expand...

Out of interest, since you added another 'leaning towards-Hillary' post, what 'incredible progressive moves' are you referring to exactly?
And can you please explain briefly what exact part/s of the 'progressiveness' you think is coming to an abrupt ending, and why?
(I'm sure I am missing certain things)

No doubt that Hillary would be far less likely to cause much political upset internationally - since she is said to stand for little change, if any at all :rolleyes:.

What I have been missing in most anti-Trump comments across the web, is an acknowledgement for the actual need for change in many areas.
While I don't seem to like either candidate as they present/ed themselves, I can see a lot of merit in some of Trump's economic plan 'ideas'. ;)

Overall, I am far less pessimistic than most seem - in fact I think America just needed a wake up call from someone outside of the established political scene.
(with regard to economic policies, taxes, healthcare, foreign policy and border protection)

Just give it 6 months and it will all turn out well. (I was just about to add: 'I promise')
 
@OnTheGo I'm not pro-Hillary, and I don't necessarily think her campaign was hugely unique, but I am anti-Trump for the reasons I've already described. The progression I was referring to is past tense progression, not specifically pinned to any specific President, just progression as a whole. I'd rather support the less threatening option (since there are only two to choose from) than what I perceive as dangerous and high risk. Just my preference.

As I mentioned in my last post, I feel this is getting a little too specifically political, so if you're genuinely interested in the progression I'm referring to, I'm more than happy to discuss over message. I just think that's getting too nitty-gritty and not overly relevant as it's past tense - we're all in the process of moving there so we have an understanding of what to expect.
 
socialcasualty said:
As I mentioned in my last post, I feel this is getting a little too specifically political, so if you're genuinely interested in the progression I'm referring to, I'm more than happy to discuss over message. I just think that's getting too nitty-gritty and not overly relevant as it's past tense - we're all in the process of moving there so we have an understanding of what to expect.
Click to expand...

Ok, in that case I think you only contributed to the "not overly relevant" posts, by dismissing as irrelevant the request to explain yourself.
I actually agree with someone in another post that it is becoming too political in a sub-forum of a DV lottery forum, but you added another pretty biased post.
To me, it all sounds very unspecific, when someone makes claims of "past progressiveness" versus "dangerous and high risk" without substantiating those claims, at the same time.
 
OnTheGo said:
Ok, in that case I think you only contributed to the "not overly relevant" posts, by dismissing as irrelevant the request to explain yourself.
I actually agree with someone in another post that it is becoming too political in a sub-forum of a DV lottery forum, but you added another pretty biased post.
To me, it all sounds very unspecific, when someone makes claims of "past progressiveness" versus "dangerous and high risk" without substantiating those claims, at the same time.
Click to expand...

I already did state why I feel that way about the changes ahead. I don't see how anything can be changed about what has already happened. Therefore, I don't see how my opinions, or anyone else's about past politics relevant as it's already there and we're all prepared for it. As I said, if you would like me to substantiate my views on past politics I'm happy to do so. I will not be engaging with someone wanting to start a political debate with me on a forum. Go for gold via message.

If it's relating to immigration politics which may be changed with the new presidency, or the potential for drastic change in the way the US is experienced by me or anyone here, then yeah, I think that's relevant (regardless of who anyone would vote for/supports). To me, past politics is not relevant because any changes that have been made are plainly obvious, and we're still making the choice to become residents. And like I said, I'd absolutely love to be wrong about Trump because whatever makes for a better world sits just fine with me. I'll happily acknowledge if I'm proven wrong.
 
Hi everyone, our interview date is fast approaching, very nervous!
We've been notified that our medical reports are ready to be collected, but what's the best option? Should we get them to send the reports directly to the consulate or should we bring the sealed reports to the interview ourselves?
Any help or guidance will be appreciated!
Cheers
 
Okay guys, I've resisted the need long enough to delete none DV immigration related posts. I understand and do relate to the uncertainties most are experiencing hence the allowance for people to voice their fears and for some of those to be addressed where possible.

However it looks like this is beginning to get dragged on and on. Everyone needs to realize this is an immigration forum, and we're going to keep it that way. Subsequent political posts will be deleted without warning.
 
TheaT said:
Hi everyone, our interview date is fast approaching, very nervous!
We've been notified that our medical reports are ready to be collected, but what's the best option? Should we get them to send the reports directly to the consulate or should we bring the sealed reports to the interview ourselves?
Any help or guidance will be appreciated!
Cheers
Click to expand...

If you're given the option of picking up the medical reports, then I suggest you do so and take them along to your interview. Eliminate the possibility of an unknown.
 
Anyone here get a copy of their medical in the mail?
The nurse said she was mailing them to the consulate and gave me the tracking number from the express envelope I gave them.
But I also received a copy of them in the mail, with a note stating to take them in my hand luggage. Are they just being extra thorough?
 
My number is current for January for Oceania, but I'm not necessarily expecting an interview in Jan (leaning towards probably not) as I re-opened and then submitted my application in early August.
I have read conflicting comments, so just wanted to clear something up, are you supposed to receive two emails - one saying your number is current (and have people already begun to receive these) and another known as the 2NL saying check the site for your interview time?

Thanks
 
It's just one email telling you there is an update to your case.

You then go onto the site where you initially checked to see if you had won. You will find the 'congratulations, you've been selected' letter has been replaced with the 2NL which has all the interview details.
 
Yep this is the site I am compelled to log into over and over again to see if my letter has been updated. Low case number but submitted in September, it's a great exercise in patience!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top