Sloner
Active Member
I think there is a chance, early upset.You know, I've just remembered that my friend has CA 54XXX again from Europe. How is her chances???
I think there is a chance, early upset.You know, I've just remembered that my friend has CA 54XXX again from Europe. How is her chances???
Unfortunatly its all about a game! Thanks for the info let me know if there is higher than yours?It's SA24** vladek. At first I was over the moon when I found out i was able to send in the forms but now, not so much. Seems my number is at the very top end of the case numbers. I'm just hoping it works out.
Very very high ! But lets wait and see. good luckhey my cn no. 2014AF106xxx is it high or low ?,there are chances to get 2nl or not
Your number is high. I think have a chance.hey my cn no. 2014AF106xxx is it high or low ?,there are chances to get 2nl or not
hello guys I have just analysed CEAC data that includes derivatives from Nepal, indicated the dense cases and u will be clear why the cutoff was too slow:
3700-3800 case # 48
3800-3900 case # 33
3900-4000 # 43
well, from CEAC datas it is seen that Nepalese selectee covered 40 % weightage as an average upto the month of March. The kcc did not provide a special cutoff for nepal so we are lucky to some extent but on the other hand there may arise a question mark for the total selectee ie 6082(for Nepal) selected from 125k or 140k. we have more than 40 % selectee having case number greater than 10k in our small group of facebook forum and it is recorded that we have 48 selectee with derivatives while counting from 3701 to 3800 case number. From this straight line equation, it is seen that 3500/0.48 = 7292 is the safe zone from nepal (excluding newborn and newly married cases)
But taking an average, 3500/0.4 = 8750 is the safe limit
the case number of mine is AS12*** so, how can I say I am in still safe zone ????
The analysis might be wrong, please reply your fruitful answer!!!
well, from CEAC datas it is seen that Nepalese selectee covered 40 % weightage as an average upto the month of March. The kcc did not provide a special cutoff for nepal so we are lucky to some extent but on the other hand there may arise a question mark for the total selectee ie 6082(for Nepal) selected from 125k or 140k. we have more than 40 % selectee having case number greater than 10k in our small group of facebook forum and it is recorded that we have 48 selectee with derivatives while counting from 3701 to 3800 case number. From this straight line equation, it is seen that 3500/0.48 = 7292 is the safe zone from nepal (excluding newborn and newly married cases)
But taking an average, 3500/0.4 = 8750 is the safe limit
the case number of mine is AS12*** so, how can I say I am in still safe zone ????
The analysis might be wrong, please reply your fruitful answer!!!
I am new to this forum and the concept about dv is not clear. how did they select the case number??, I mean we have 23k selectee and maximum case # of 27k, but is it possible the spread up of case # upto the highest case# ??( may be 10 selectee per hundred???) or did they fix the case numbers for the countrywise at the time of selection process ??? or is it a random selection???
Well I have counted the case numbers further;hello guys I have just analysed CEAC data that includes derivatives from Nepal, indicated the dense cases and u will be clear why the cutoff was too slow:
3700-3800 case # 48
3800-3900 case # 33
3900-4000 # 43
Well I have counted the case numbers further;
4000-4100 # 46
4100-4200 # 36
4200-4300 # 35
4300-4325 # 17
So what I have noticed is, there are around 40 nepalese case numbers out of 100 and just around 20 from other asian countries and the rest of it are holes . So this shows nepalese actually occupies around 60% of case number in total(out of 100 CN)...Till now iran does not seems to dominate the numbers supporting the theory that iran has the maximum case numbers from 5k to 10k... This might be actually a good news for the higher case numbers(>10K) from nepal.
i have a problem, are they cross checking my visa forms (which i have sent) with my initial application form (Nov-2012) ??? Once they replied me " We have received your doc & it's under Process " , does it mean all are in order????
i have a problem, are they cross checking my visa forms (which i have sent) with my initial application form (Nov-2012) ??? Once they replied me " We have received your doc & it's under Process " , does it mean all are in order????
They will cross check the electronic entry with what you later submit in the 122/230 forms. If there is a discrepancy they will red flag that for attention of the embassy during interview. KCC will not disqualify you once you were notified about being selected - so any issue is up to the embassy to resolve. The message you posted doesn't mean anything, good or bad.
Is there a significant difference between your entry and 122/230 forms?
In DV13 17000 win = CN 6056, max CN - 10682.Holes=10682-6056=4626So - just as a guess 15k entrants with 8k family members. THat means the 15k were spread among the 27k numbers.
In DV13 17000 win = CN 6056, max CN - 10682.Holes=10682-6056=4626
In DV14 23000 win = CN , 8193??? CN - 27000. Holes=27000-8193=18807.
Simon, Now it is clear from fraudulent entry and new software.