vladek15425
Well-Known Member
Yep agreed. The holes are somewhat predictable. For EU there are about 46k selectees and numbers go up to "the high 50's". The 46k includes derivatives, so you could take the max case number and say the holes are around 20% (if you include derivatives) or around 60% of the actual case numbers (if you ignore derivatives). So, a move of 10,000 numbers will only yield 4000 interviews and if they were ALL sucessful that would produce about 8k visas. However, based on the 2013 CEAC data, Refused, AP and abandoned cases account for over 25% of cases - so that means 10,000 would yield no more than 6,000 visas max (probably more like 5,000). Countries that hit limits help other countries so the first 10k would have a higher yield than the last 10k.
SO - EU could get 18-20k of the visas (especially if NACARA is not using many of the 5k), and that would take more than 40k case numbers. I just can't imagine cases over 50k having much chance at all and cases in the 40's are risky, but really, I can't imagine cases in the 30's missing out.
Exellent
Can u pls provide me with AF data numbers , so that I can try to apply ur formula on it?