am100 said:My Labor Certification (RIR - EB2) was filed on Feb 6, 2004 with the Texas SWA in Dallas. I have to relocate with my current job (with the same company) to a different city in the US.
1) What would be the impact to my LC?
2) Is there any way, I can retain my original priority date?
3) Is it possible to retain the priority date by maintaining the current location as home base and the new location as a temporary project location? What are the exact provisions under that situation?
Any other thoughts/ideas as to how I can relocate while maitaining my current LC application and priority date. Thanks.
am100 said:My Labor Certification (RIR - EB2) was filed on Feb 6, 2004 with the Texas SWA in Dallas. I have to relocate with my current job (with the same company) to a different city in the US.
1) What would be the impact to my LC?
2) Is there any way, I can retain my original priority date?
3) Is it possible to retain the priority date by maintaining the current location as home base and the new location as a temporary project location? What are the exact provisions under that situation?
Any other thoughts/ideas as to how I can relocate while maitaining my current LC application and priority date. Thanks.
WaitingonLC said:They have recruited you for a specific position for a future job in a perticular location.If the offered position location has not changed/moved there should not be any issue.If the offered job position locations are moved/changed to a reasonable distance places then employer will have to do the new labor market recruiting.This is per recent FAQ's from Backlog center.Please read the FAQ for more information
http://www.ows.doleta.gov/foreign/pdf/backlog_faqs_5-2-05.pdf
am100 said:Thanks sfmars and WaitingonLC.
Let me provide some clarifications. I have been on my current position for the past 3 years and LC was filed about 1.5 years back (Feb 04) for my current position. My LC is at Dallas BEC. No 45 day letter recd.
Now my employer wants to relocate me with my current job to a new location. And I am trying to figure out my options of not impacting my pending LC.
Also, if my pending LC will not be valid anymore cos of my relocation, the employer is willing to pursue PERM, which according to them, would take 6-8 months of prep work before filing. (Fortune 100 company, more than 100,000 employees).
Given the fact that EB2 might retrogress, I am more inclined to save my current pending LC and the priority date.
Any thoughts please? Thanks.
sfmars said:How far is your new job ? If it is less than 40-50 miles I do not think it will be the problem to maintain your current LC.
If it is more than reasonable distance then you can explore 2 options:
1. Negotiate with the employer to keep you on the payroll on the old place and physically work on the new one (as a temporary contractor).
This way is too risky from my point of view
2. Ask your employer to file PERM from the new place for your new position
am100 said:Thanks sfmars.
Yes, the new job is in totally different city. Much farther than 40-50 miles.
Looking at your suggestions, why do you feel that it is too risky to be temporarily assigned to a new project. I will still be a permanent employee. But I will just be assigned on "long distance project" for a little while. Do you think that would be reasonable? But given the size of my company, I am not yet sure if they will agree to it. I am gonna give it a shot though.
Also, looking at PERM, I am just concerned that I might loose 2 years of my LC case and priority date, which will be handy if EB2 goes into retrogression. Tough decision.. !!
Thanks.
am100 said:Thanks sfmars.
Yes, the new job is in totally different city. Much farther than 40-50 miles.
Looking at your suggestions, why do you feel that it is too risky to be temporarily assigned to a new project. I will still be a permanent employee. But I will just be assigned on "long distance project" for a little while. Do you think that would be reasonable? But given the size of my company, I am not yet sure if they will agree to it. I am gonna give it a shot though.
Also, looking at PERM, I am just concerned that I might loose 2 years of my LC case and priority date, which will be handy if EB2 goes into retrogression. Tough decision.. !!
Thanks.
am100 said:My Labor Certification (RIR - EB2) was filed on Feb 6, 2004 with the Texas SWA in Dallas. I have to relocate with my current job (with the same company) to a different city in the US.
1) What would be the impact to my LC?
2) Is there any way, I can retain my original priority date?
3) Is it possible to retain the priority date by maintaining the current location as home base and the new location as a temporary project location? What are the exact provisions under that situation?
Any other thoughts/ideas as to how I can relocate while maitaining my current LC application and priority date. Thanks.
am100 said:Thanks sfmars, pcc and MDwatch.
I liked the idea from MDwatch. I am going to see if they accept that. It is difficult though with large corporations. They are ready to promote me along with the relocation, but I am trying to see if not taking the promotion will help me retain my currently pending LC.
foret1 said:if your hr is understanding, you should go for the promotion. as long as your hr agrees to leave things as they are on your current lc application, you should be ok on that one and then try the perm with the promotion title as mdwatch suggested. then you win on all sides.
but you are right about big corporations. i am in one and given all the re-orgs, groups and titles are always changing here. my hr was "understanding" (for lack of a better term to use here ).
anyways, don't forgot anything or propose not to get the promotion...talk to them and see if you have chance to win on all counts.
good luck to you!
gp111 said:Friends..
Finally I got something to post regarding to my case
Just got a call from my Attorney that my case has been approved by Dallas Backlog Reduction Center.
Here are the details
CA RIR EB-2
Priority Date : Sept 23 2002
Regional Receipt Date : August 14 2003
Dallas BPC Case # D-04320-025xx
45 Day Letter Received/ Replied : March 14 2005
Approval Received in Mail (Attorney): June 30 2005
It was a long journey.. But hey I really had good time (even though lot of fustration, tension, confusion, yelling at eachother) sharing information with all of you guys..
I really hope & pray that all of you will get out of this BPC as soon as possible.
MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU
Gaurang