Dallas Backlog Elimination Center Tracking
- Thread starter gp111
- Start date
Please start posting Bec letter info
A suggestion for DOL BEC forum that a spread sheet or an text file can be appended to fallowing info so that moving forward we will be knowing the trend of approvals , And any volunteer is appreciated.
Request folks who have recieved bec letters to append to this text or else just post it so that volunteer can append it.
A similar can be started for Phily centre so that we can stick to one thread
BEC 45 Day Letter Status for Dallas
=========================
User --> PD --> RD --> CaseLoc --> BEC-Loc
=======================================================================
benben912 -->Nov 2002-->Jun 2003-->TX-->Dallas
gc_us_k --> Apr 2003 --> March 2004 --> CA --> Dallas.
Zany_Brainy --> May 1, 2002 --> May 28, 2003 --> cA --> Dallas
Georgetm --> March 20, 2003 --> XX --> CA --> Dallas
scorp29 -->xxxx-->Sep 30 2003-->TX--->Dallas
madur --> Jun 18 2003 -->Nov 10 2003 -->TX-->Dallas
dhana8 --> Feb 5 2003 --> Mar 11 2004 --> CA --> Dallas
sudmoni-->Apr 19 2004 -->Apr 24 2004--->Loui--> Dalls
jamiw75 --> Sep 2003 --> Apr 2004 -->TX-->Dallas
A suggestion for DOL BEC forum that a spread sheet or an text file can be appended to fallowing info so that moving forward we will be knowing the trend of approvals , And any volunteer is appreciated.
Request folks who have recieved bec letters to append to this text or else just post it so that volunteer can append it.
A similar can be started for Phily centre so that we can stick to one thread
BEC 45 Day Letter Status for Dallas
=========================
User --> PD --> RD --> CaseLoc --> BEC-Loc
=======================================================================
benben912 -->Nov 2002-->Jun 2003-->TX-->Dallas
gc_us_k --> Apr 2003 --> March 2004 --> CA --> Dallas.
Zany_Brainy --> May 1, 2002 --> May 28, 2003 --> cA --> Dallas
Georgetm --> March 20, 2003 --> XX --> CA --> Dallas
scorp29 -->xxxx-->Sep 30 2003-->TX--->Dallas
madur --> Jun 18 2003 -->Nov 10 2003 -->TX-->Dallas
dhana8 --> Feb 5 2003 --> Mar 11 2004 --> CA --> Dallas
sudmoni-->Apr 19 2004 -->Apr 24 2004--->Loui--> Dalls
jamiw75 --> Sep 2003 --> Apr 2004 -->TX-->Dallas
Zany_Brainy
Registered Users (C)
Well..
Dude MISUNDERSTOOD,
You misunderstood, I asked GP111 wether I will be one of the first 'SF' (San Francisco) cases to be processed or not ? Since SF has sent cases from May onwards to the BEC's and I have PD of MAY 1 2002.
Anyway, I understand the whole national FIFO thing, just would like someway to know when they are going to start processing..
misunderstood said:
Dude MISUNDERSTOOD,
You misunderstood, I asked GP111 wether I will be one of the first 'SF' (San Francisco) cases to be processed or not ? Since SF has sent cases from May onwards to the BEC's and I have PD of MAY 1 2002.
Anyway, I understand the whole national FIFO thing, just would like someway to know when they are going to start processing..
nother1inline
Registered Users (C)
mnhrdc said:
Here's a situation that is getting difficult to comprehend and has been raised by some other folks in some other forums including this one.
Now we have guys with PDs of mid-late 2003 (Yes PDs and not RDs!!) getting the letters! Nothing against that but then if these guys respond in 45 days, what's the whole FIFO based sorting about if the guys with earlier PDs (say 2002!) haven't even recd. the letters, let alone being able to respond to them.
Anyone with more insight into how this thing's gonna work!!!
BRC letter update
Dear friends,
I finally saw the 45-day letter (lawyer office scanned and sent it to me). The letter has 3 parts:
1st part/page : Letter from Dallas BRC officer letter to the employer stressing the need for "45-day" reply timeframe. The letter has to be replied within 45 days. (In my case the letter was dated December 29th and my office shd respond before Feb 5th). Most importantly this letter does not have anything abt my received date. It has only my PD date-August 2002, Job code, name. So this means they are going by PD ONLY.
2nd part/page; Any corrections to the orginal ETA forms A and B can be made here. They have to be listed point by point. If no corrections, it should say none.
3rd part/page: This gives two options for employer; to continue with current petition or withdraw.
My employer will sign have to sign and sent it to lawyer who will forward that to BRC.
User --> PD --> RD --> CaseLoc --> BEC-Loc
buckleup1 08/2002 07/2003 CA, SFO federal labor BEC - Texas
Dear friends,
I finally saw the 45-day letter (lawyer office scanned and sent it to me). The letter has 3 parts:
1st part/page : Letter from Dallas BRC officer letter to the employer stressing the need for "45-day" reply timeframe. The letter has to be replied within 45 days. (In my case the letter was dated December 29th and my office shd respond before Feb 5th). Most importantly this letter does not have anything abt my received date. It has only my PD date-August 2002, Job code, name. So this means they are going by PD ONLY.
2nd part/page; Any corrections to the orginal ETA forms A and B can be made here. They have to be listed point by point. If no corrections, it should say none.
3rd part/page: This gives two options for employer; to continue with current petition or withdraw.
My employer will sign have to sign and sent it to lawyer who will forward that to BRC.
User --> PD --> RD --> CaseLoc --> BEC-Loc
buckleup1 08/2002 07/2003 CA, SFO federal labor BEC - Texas
What corrections can be made to ETA forms A and B????
Dear Friends,
Does anyone know anything about the changes that can be made on the ETA forms A and B? Can we make changes so that the degree requirement can be changed from a Bachelor's to a Master's so that, the category will change from EB3 to EB2? Or is it something different? I would appreciate any thoughts on this.
Thanks,
Karnish
Dear Friends,
Does anyone know anything about the changes that can be made on the ETA forms A and B? Can we make changes so that the degree requirement can be changed from a Bachelor's to a Master's so that, the category will change from EB3 to EB2? Or is it something different? I would appreciate any thoughts on this.
Thanks,
Karnish
buckleup1 said:
GOT the BEC LETTER
Just found out from my HR that they have received the much anticipated BEC letter. My letter doesn't have any corrections on it. I just have to choose the continue with the case option. I do have a new case number now. Here are my details
State: TX
TWC: applied 2/12/2003
DOL: RD 9/8/2003
Recd: BEC Letter 12/23/2004
Case : EB3 RIR
Just found out from my HR that they have received the much anticipated BEC letter. My letter doesn't have any corrections on it. I just have to choose the continue with the case option. I do have a new case number now. Here are my details
State: TX
TWC: applied 2/12/2003
DOL: RD 9/8/2003
Recd: BEC Letter 12/23/2004
Case : EB3 RIR
madur said:
Add to what misunderstood states
1.Advt should state MS or Equivalient of BS + 5 yrs progressive experience
in the form ET750
2.Level 2 wage Appx $40.52 - $47.32 / hr wages. for 2002-2003.
3. very clear explanation of job responsibelity like lead position.
I thought the same when EB3 dates retrogressed and got very frustrated. But the attorney clearly told me that what matters for EB2 is what is specified on 750 form, not the news paper advertisement. Infact ads were run for 2 positions and the other one doesn't have a masters degree and it is EB3.
But my 750 form asks for Masters + 2 years experience. Here is the reply I got from my attorney
Minimum requirements are not required to be stated in advertisements under RIR (reduction-in-recruitment). They are only required under the traditional (supervised) LC track. Your case was filed under RIR. Your case was filed under the EB-2 category as it requires a Master's degree or Equivalent in CS, IT or related field such as Industrial Mgmt. + 2 years of experience as a ************* Programmer Analyst or ****** Consultant.
If you have additional questions or concerns, please feel free to ask.
I am just going by her word now.
But my 750 form asks for Masters + 2 years experience. Here is the reply I got from my attorney
Minimum requirements are not required to be stated in advertisements under RIR (reduction-in-recruitment). They are only required under the traditional (supervised) LC track. Your case was filed under RIR. Your case was filed under the EB-2 category as it requires a Master's degree or Equivalent in CS, IT or related field such as Industrial Mgmt. + 2 years of experience as a ************* Programmer Analyst or ****** Consultant.
If you have additional questions or concerns, please feel free to ask.
I am just going by her word now.
Zany_Brainy
Registered Users (C)
When will they start processing ?
Can anyone shed any light on that ?
I have PD: May 1 2002, CA SFO
Already recieved letter (last week of dec)
Already replied ..
Seems like no one having PD before me has recieved any letter till now (as per the information posted here)
Also before you guys assume that the letters are going by no order whatsoever you must understand that the people posting on this board constitute of maybe 10% of the 300,000 people who have their cases sent to the BEC's.
So as per my assesment, I seem to have recieved the letter when I should have as per FIFO by PD.
Thanks
ZB
Can anyone shed any light on that ?
I have PD: May 1 2002, CA SFO
Already recieved letter (last week of dec)
Already replied ..
Seems like no one having PD before me has recieved any letter till now (as per the information posted here)
Also before you guys assume that the letters are going by no order whatsoever you must understand that the people posting on this board constitute of maybe 10% of the 300,000 people who have their cases sent to the BEC's.
So as per my assesment, I seem to have recieved the letter when I should have as per FIFO by PD.
Thanks
ZB
nother1inline
Registered Users (C)
Zany_Brainy said:Can anyone shed any light on that ?
I have PD: May 1 2002, CA SFO
Already recieved letter (last week of dec)
Already replied ..
Seems like no one having PD before me has recieved any letter till now (as per the information posted here)
Also before you guys assume that the letters are going by no order whatsoever you must understand that the people posting on this board constitute of maybe 10% of the 300,000 people who have their cases sent to the BEC's.
So as per my assesment, I seem to have recieved the letter when I should have as per FIFO by PD.
Thanks
ZB
Hmm...FIFO - My PD is June 19th 2002 and I read about someone with a PD beyond my RD (which is May 2003) receive a letter from BEC. Both our cases were from CA!!
BEC letters
Folks
I have my RD as May 12th 2003 from SFO, and I haven't received any letter. Wondering what policy is BEC adopting neither LIFO/FIFO/LILO. Observation on this thread points people with RD of October 2003 have already received it
Is there any way to find out to which BEC has the cases gone to based on the Regional case#. When trying to call the national service center it asks for a 10 digit code which apparently I dont know what it is.
Any pointers and help highly appreciated
Folks
I have my RD as May 12th 2003 from SFO, and I haven't received any letter. Wondering what policy is BEC adopting neither LIFO/FIFO/LILO. Observation on this thread points people with RD of October 2003 have already received it
Is there any way to find out to which BEC has the cases gone to based on the Regional case#. When trying to call the national service center it asks for a 10 digit code which apparently I dont know what it is.
Any pointers and help highly appreciated
sacbee said:
EB2 requires 95% of level 2 or more for easy adjudication but you never know
H1B priv wages are different from the EB2 level wages.
Most of cases H1B wages paid are equal to level1 wages paid.
DOL wants underpaid allien should be paid equal or min to American worker
Most of us think we are better paid.
The definition is that person does NOT require supervision but capable of managing others
Dot codes and designation are same but salary levels are different.
Last edited by a moderator: