Dallas Backlog Elimination Center Tracking
- Thread starter gp111
- Start date
kothari_rupesh
Registered Users (C)
labor_dec02 said:
check your pm
Zany_Brainy said:
Me too in the same boat.
PD: Jan-08-02 (CA), RD : Aug-03
Dallas BEC : 45 day CRNL: Feb-05
RIR/EB-2
As mentioned by RAYDHAN, we see many approvals for cases with PDs between June'02 -- Aug'02 but not many with prior PDs like ours. Hopefully, we will also get the good news soon.
May be the RD (apart from PD) is also playing an important role in this process as per the following message of posted by GP111.
www.lewslaw.com "BEC in Dallas is currently processing California cases with receipt dates at DOL in San Francisco of May to July 2003" DOES NOT MEAN that DALLAS IS FOLLOWING RD INSTEAD OF PD OR DALLAS IN ONLY PROCESSING CA CASES
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.lewslaw.com is just informing its clients (which are from CA) that if your case had RD of May to July 2003 at Dallas then its under process. ALL Regional RIR Cases moved from california has RD of May-03 & above
worriedOkie
Registered Users (C)
RAYDHAN
Mine PD is March 2002, Oklahoma haven't got my LC approval yet.
----------------
OK PD:03/12/02(EB3/RIR)
TX RD:02/27/04
Mine PD is March 2002, Oklahoma haven't got my LC approval yet.
----------------
OK PD:03/12/02(EB3/RIR)
TX RD:02/27/04
MA001 said:
I got my letter from Dallas BEC on Feb 09 2005. My lawyer responded to it the same day. Someone asked me about the exact PD, the exact date is Aug 19 2002. Actually the letter that my lawyer and I received has a date of June 3 2005 but I got my labor approval notice only by June 27 2005.
Guys, I wish every one best of luck as this forum is very nice to get an estimate as to what is happening at processing centers. Else governments are same in every country. Sometimes my HR did not knew things that were posted here. They had to contact the company lawyer to confirm.
gp111, Icarus, Zany Brainy et al.. thanks for providing "insider" information. Keep up the good work!
nother1inline
Registered Users (C)
mnhrdc said:Hang in there folks , neelP postings has given some ray of hope since the approvals are not in order but in bunches so we may also see the light in near future. Late but never too late
Thats right - NeelP's postings are a good indication - Again I don't think there's anything particularly wrong with the cases in the first half of 2002 (coz that sounds absurd), it just seems like its the turn of that batch of applications to suffer for a (hopefully little) while now !!
Aanlyzing may be by PD but NOT mailing by PD
The folks who havent recieved and having earlier PD need not worry toomuch at this stage.
Read NeelP mail, the approvals are Dec 2001 to Aug 2002 recieved on same date to same company, which means the approvals are not mailed as and when the approvals are done . They are accumulating and mailing in batches.
Per Icarus the earlier cases would have been allready adjudicated but nowhere Icarus say what is procedure of mailing (by PD or by bunches like neelp mail)
So hang in there Ray and others ZB ows me a lunch
nother1inline said:
The folks who havent recieved and having earlier PD need not worry toomuch at this stage.
Read NeelP mail, the approvals are Dec 2001 to Aug 2002 recieved on same date to same company, which means the approvals are not mailed as and when the approvals are done . They are accumulating and mailing in batches.
Per Icarus the earlier cases would have been allready adjudicated but nowhere Icarus say what is procedure of mailing (by PD or by bunches like neelp mail)
So hang in there Ray and others ZB ows me a lunch
Need of 45 day letter after 7th year H1B extension
Icarus & experts,
For 7th year H1B extension, as per previous postings the attorney can contact to h1b7yr@dal.dflc.us for the proof of the labor certification pending for more than 1 year. Considering the fact that if attorney agrees for the H1 extension the sponsoring company is also has the same intention.
In that case, will a 45 letter be issued for this pending labor certification case by DFLC? Because, the intention of proceeding with the labor certification is already expressed by the attorney in requesting the 7th year extension request. Is not that enough for DOL to conclude that this pending labor certification is OK to be processed?
Thank you.
Icarus & experts,
For 7th year H1B extension, as per previous postings the attorney can contact to h1b7yr@dal.dflc.us for the proof of the labor certification pending for more than 1 year. Considering the fact that if attorney agrees for the H1 extension the sponsoring company is also has the same intention.
In that case, will a 45 letter be issued for this pending labor certification case by DFLC? Because, the intention of proceeding with the labor certification is already expressed by the attorney in requesting the 7th year extension request. Is not that enough for DOL to conclude that this pending labor certification is OK to be processed?
Thank you.
Detroit2003
Registered Users (C)
Approval letter to Home Address of beneficiary?
Please confirm this!!
Approval letter comes to the Home Address of beneficiary also?
I thought Labor & I-140 are more company filings and I-485 is more of a personal filing!
nother1inline said:
Please confirm this!!
Approval letter comes to the Home Address of beneficiary also?
I thought Labor & I-140 are more company filings and I-485 is more of a personal filing!
Detroit2003 said:
Yes. Beneficiary also gets the letter informing that the LC has been approved 9at the mailing address in the application). But the certification (which is the application with approval stamp) is sent to the attorney.
Icarus had clarified it in one of his earlier postings and I confirmed it with my lawyer yesterday.
rest_2004_free
Registered Users (C)
Same as me
Mine was sent to OH SESA on 07/2003. RD June 2004 chicago. I never received 45 day letter. I am worried.
Mine was sent to OH SESA on 07/2003. RD June 2004 chicago. I never received 45 day letter. I am worried.
saz_1 said:
Icarus, what about Michigan SWA cases?
That is not only Indiana SWA cases that are in a big mess. I filled my case in Michigan SWA in March 2002 TR case and never made it to the regional. Indiana may have the oldest SWA cases but, the fact is all SWA cases are in a big black hole at Dallas BRC and I don't understand why Icarus does not give us any updates on that.
That is not only Indiana SWA cases that are in a big mess. I filled my case in Michigan SWA in March 2002 TR case and never made it to the regional. Indiana may have the oldest SWA cases but, the fact is all SWA cases are in a big black hole at Dallas BRC and I don't understand why Icarus does not give us any updates on that.
indiacard said:
am100
hi am100,
i got your PM, but haven't been able to reply by sending you one. i have tried various times with no luck. so i am replying to your message here instead.
i don't think i am the right person though to answer your question. i remember reading somewhere in this forum that it's possible to file 2 lcs with the same company under your name as long as the titles and job descriptions are different. so you leave the existing one with BEC and apply a new one under perm.
but i am really not sure though. perhaps someone else on forum can help with this?
hi am100,
i got your PM, but haven't been able to reply by sending you one. i have tried various times with no luck. so i am replying to your message here instead.
i don't think i am the right person though to answer your question. i remember reading somewhere in this forum that it's possible to file 2 lcs with the same company under your name as long as the titles and job descriptions are different. so you leave the existing one with BEC and apply a new one under perm.
but i am really not sure though. perhaps someone else on forum can help with this?
antonioa77
Registered Users (C)
misunderstood said:
i fear that by what they mean by :they will finish data entry by sep 2005 it means they will enter all cases partly but not completely by that time.
if they really entered ,as they said ,till now 200,000 cases completely why they didn't send 45 days letters then for all those cases?
i think that they just entered completely most the regional cases which r like 60 to 70 K cases. whereas SWA cases especially in DBEC r just being entered partially and they will be finished being entered partially by sep 2005. therefore, most SWA cases will start receiving letters after sep 2005 because from october 2005 they will start being entered completely, for how long ? i don't know. as per ICarus, the contract for data entry finishes in march 2006.
in summary i think SWa cases have a long way to receive 45 days letters starting from october 2005 till march 2006. it is going nowhere.