Dallas Backlog Elimination Center Tracking

Case Status - Data Review

whatever2002 said:
my case has PD 12/2002, RIR, CA, replied 45 letter to Dallas in Jan., but the status is still "data review". According to this thread, "data review" means the data entry is complete and wait for response from 45 letter??? Does that mean they didn't receive the 45 letter response? If so, the case should be closed after 45 days, right? Why is it still show "data review"? so confused .... Is there anybody in the same situation? Thanks!


My case status is also "Data Review". However, I have not received 45-day letter. Inspite, my lawyer sent letter proactively. I think case status "Data Review" is some generic status which DEC is using for some general purpose, may be its something like "hold" or something. No clue.

PD July 2002, RIR, TX
 
hopehope41 said:
My case status is also "Data Review". However, I have not received 45-day letter. Inspite, my lawyer sent letter proactively. I think case status "Data Review" is some generic status which DEC is using for some general purpose, may be its something like "hold" or something. No clue.

PD July 2002, RIR, TX

Thanks, hopehope41. Did your attorney receive anything from BEC after they sent the proactive response? I have no clue how BEC picked up cases to process. Even ours are RIR cases and 45 letter were responded long time ago, we are still skipped even according to BEC's current definition of FIFO, we should not (be skipped). sign ....
 
45 day letter does not meen automatic approval

whatever2002 said:
Thanks, hopehope41. Did your attorney receive anything from BEC after they sent the proactive response? I have no clue how BEC picked up cases to process. Even ours are RIR cases and 45 letter were responded long time ago, we are still skipped even according to BEC's current definition of FIFO, we should not (be skipped). sign ....

Why do you think that DBEC did not find any problems in your case and just simply skipped one and violated FIFO? I am personally very surprised that up to now we have not seen any denials from DBEC but continue to see only approvals. Several times people complained that their cases were mistakenly closed due to not responding to 45 day letters but DBEC reinstated them when attorneys did inqueries. Look at the PBLC database for the different years, you will find a lot of denials there (Regional RIR cases) and a lot of cases remanded back to state.

As for 45DL it is BEC's stupid inventure just to make their life easy. They did not expect that it will be more complicated through this.
They thought old cases which were filed for people with PD 2001/2002/2003 will be withdrawn (saying no in 45DL) and they have more than 30% cases less to be considered.

You are from specific state CA, the state of Internet soap bubles and huge lay offs. I know that in the particular period of time (2002/2003) every second case in CA got NOF on the SWA or regional level.
Your case may have got NOF on the state/reginal level and DBEC decided that it does not deserve privilege to be considered at this period of time. It is not a surprise that majority of NOF and problematic cases is from CA.

It may happen that DBEC put off problematic cases and cases with NOF to make a decision regarding them when SWA cases (which never went to region) will be considered in accordance of SWA FIFO PD. I do not believe personally in the separate queue for NOF cases I do not think that DBEC has time and resorces to have complicated multithreaded process.

The good thing for you is that your case has PD 2002 and I believe will be considered one of the first when SWA cases come in.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please support Sections 8001 and 8002 of S. 1932 in the conference process.

http://www3.capwiz.com/c-span/issues/bills/?billtype=H.R.&billnumb=4241&congress=109

click above link and send the below letter to your local house member

Dear Member of Congress,

Ø As we begin Fiscal Year 2006, America’s long-term economic health must be at the forefront of our nation’s legislative agenda. I am writing to alert you to several issues that we believe pose a significant threat to U.S. competitiveness and economic security. Leading business and scientific organizations recently warned that the United States is in danger of losing its innovative edge. Lagging student interest in math, science and engineering, coupled with a pattern of reduced government investment in basic research in the physical sciences are troubling indicators for the future. These disturbing trends must be reversed.

Ø As we continue efforts to grow our pipeline of American scientists and engineers, we need to enable U.S. companies recruiting at U.S. universities to have access to all the graduates – including foreign students. For example, in electrical engineering, 56 percent of master’s and 66 percent of the PhD graduates of U.S. programs in 2004 were foreign students. We should open the doors wide to these talented individuals. Unfortunately, current U.S. Government policies are going in the exact opposite direction. If U.S. businesses are not able to hire or retain these employees, our overseas competitors will.

Ø The green card process also needs reform to enable employers to hire and retain the best qualified individuals in sufficient numbers. We believe that those individuals with the education, experience, knowledge and skills critical to U.S. competitiveness in the 21 st Century should be granted priority permanent resident status. Such reforms would significantly assist U.S. employers in retaining that talent, as well as alleviate the overwhelming demand for H-1B visas. USCIS’ efforts to reduce application backlogs have created another problem – unavailability of permanent visas, frequently called “green cards.” As of October 1, 2005, the State Department has set the clock backward – adding years to the wait for a green card for thousands of foreign professionals from countries such as India, China and the Philippines. The impact of the new restrictions will make it nearly impossible for these highly educated and skilled workers to gain permanent residence in the United States in the foreseeable future. Moreover, the recent unavailability of visas will force thousands of professionals to put their lives on hold, with the inability to change jobs, locations or employers.

Ø To make matters worse, many of these professionals – including researchers, scientists, teachers and engineers – will see their wait for permanent residency drag on for many more years. Our system of backlogs, delays and unpredictability is discouraging and unwelcoming, forcing many valued employees to seek employment in other nations. This is not only disruptive to U.S. employers and our economy, but exceedingly unfair to hard-working, valued members of the American workforce. Access to this talent keeps innovation and jobs in the United States. Tapping America’s Potential and the National Association of Manufacturers’ 2005 Labor Day Report are available at www.competeamerica.org and www.nam.org.

Ø The U.S. Senate passed S. 1932 which includes Section 8001 and Section 8002 to resolve the foregoing problems which this nation faces. The House bill, H.R. 4241, failed to include these important parts of the budget reconciliation legislation. Please support Sections 8001 and 8002 of S. 1932 in the conference process.

Thank you.
Sincerely your name,
Address
Tel no
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tracker

Hello Dallas BPC people,

I have added a column in the tracker that will not whether you received a state or regional NOF prior to being transferred to BPC. As always I can also add additional comments in the comments section.

Please post updates if you got an NOF. The more of you post the better info you will get to determine if that is A reason why some cases are being skipped.

JW
 
Excellent synopsis!

dsugandhi said:
Passage of H.R. 4241 - What Does It Mean to Me?

Apparently there are some people in the immigrant community who misunderstand that the immigrant visa and H-1B recaptures or spouse/children special provisions may take effect soon. Passage of H.R. 4241 does not mean that the immigration bills have also passed the House. The H.R. 4241, unlike the Senate S.1932, did not include the immigration bills. Then why did the immigrant community monitor the passage of this bill? Both S. 1932 of the Senate and H.R. 4241 are two different versions of the same legislation named Omnibus Deficit Reduction Act ( also called Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) and unless the House bill, H.R. 4241, passes, the process of conference to compromise between the House bill and the Senate bill will not be commenced. Since the House bill did not include the immigration packet, while the Senate bill included immigration packet, the immigrant community wanted to see that the conference process would start as early as possible so that they will know whether the Congress will eventually accept the S. 1932 immigration packet and legislate it into a law.
In this regard, the passage of H.R. 4241 is not the end but the beginning of the process to get the Senate S.1932 immigration recapture bill be passed as part of the final version of the Ominibus Deficit Reduction Act. The Congress will go into the Thanksgiving holiday recess from next week and no voting sessions will start until next month. Due to another big holidays ahead, Christritmas and New Year, the Congress will have a very limited time to wrap up the legislative activities of the First Session of the 109th Congress. Report indicates that the conference process is likely to start next month when the Congress returns to the Hill. Since this is the beginning of the process to get the immigration bills accepted by the both Houses, the business, academic, and immigrant communities should expand their efforts for the next one week or so in order to assure that the current immigration clog be relieved as soon as possible.

DsuGandhi,
Excellent Synopsis, I am sure this will be very useful for everybody on this forum to understand where what’s going on and where do we want to go.
Thanks a lot!
 
Are you Dipesh Sugandhi by any chance???

dsugandhi said:
Passage of H.R. 4241 - What Does It Mean to Me?

Apparently there are some people in the immigrant community who misunderstand that the immigrant visa and H-1B recaptures or spouse/children special provisions may take effect soon. Passage of H.R. 4241 does not mean that the immigration bills have also passed the House. The H.R. 4241, unlike the Senate S.1932, did not include the immigration bills. Then why did the immigrant community monitor the passage of this bill? Both S. 1932 of the Senate and H.R. 4241 are two different versions of the same legislation named Omnibus Deficit Reduction Act ( also called Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) and unless the House bill, H.R. 4241, passes, the process of conference to compromise between the House bill and the Senate bill will not be commenced. Since the House bill did not include the immigration packet, while the Senate bill included immigration packet, the immigrant community wanted to see that the conference process would start as early as possible so that they will know whether the Congress will eventually accept the S. 1932 immigration packet and legislate it into a law.
In this regard, the passage of H.R. 4241 is not the end but the beginning of the process to get the Senate S.1932 immigration recapture bill be passed as part of the final version of the Ominibus Deficit Reduction Act. The Congress will go into the Thanksgiving holiday recess from next week and no voting sessions will start until next month. Due to another big holidays ahead, Christritmas and New Year, the Congress will have a very limited time to wrap up the legislative activities of the First Session of the 109th Congress. Report indicates that the conference process is likely to start next month when the Congress returns to the Hill. Since this is the beginning of the process to get the immigration bills accepted by the both Houses, the business, academic, and immigrant communities should expand their efforts for the next one week or so in order to assure that the current immigration clog be relieved as soon as possible.
 
Def and NOF

Hi, are Def (deficiency) and NOF the same thing? I got a def from SWA asking for authorization letter from my company. After I supplied SWA with that letter, my labor application then transerferred to regional level.

Thank you!
 
sfmars said:
Why do you think that DBEC did not find any problems in your case and just simply skipped one and violated FIFO? I am personally very surprised that up to now we have not seen any denials from DBEC but continue to see only approvals. Several times people complained that their cases were mistakenly closed due to not responding to 45 day letters but DBEC reinstated them when attorneys did inqueries. Look at the PBLC database for the different years, you will find a lot of denials there (Regional RIR cases) and a lot of cases remanded back to state.

As for 45DL it is BEC's stupid inventure just to make their life easy. They did not expect that it will be more complicated through this.
They thought old cases which were filed for people with PD 2001/2002/2003 will be withdrawn (saying no in 45DL) and they have more than 30% cases less to be considered.

You are from specific state CA, the state of Internet soap bubles and huge lay offs. I know that in the particular period of time (2002/2003) every second case in CA got NOF on the SWA or regional level.
Your case may have got NOF on the state/reginal level and DBEC decided that it does not deserve privilege to be considered at this period of time. It is not a surprise that majority of NOF and problematic cases is from CA.

It may happen that DBEC put off problematic cases and cases with NOF to make a decision regarding them when SWA cases (which never went to region) will be considered in accordance of SWA FIFO PD. I do not believe personally in the separate queue for NOF cases I do not think that DBEC has time and resorces to have complicated multithreaded process.

The good thing for you is that your case has PD 2002 and I believe will be considered one of the first when SWA cases come in.

I didn't get any NOF on SWA or regional level. If BEC had any problem on my case, accroding to the published rules and input from gurus like Icarus, gp, they would probably send inquiries to the attorney/employer. One of your statements, "remaned to state in BEC", is a pretty wild guess and hard to believe. davidyee's case has much ealier PD with no problem, still got approved so late. Just want to know if there are other people with 45 letter and 2002 PD, still not appoved.
 
whatever2002 said:
I didn't get any NOF on SWA or regional level. If BEC had any problem on my case, accroding to the published rules and input from gurus like Icarus, gp, they would probably send inquiries to the attorney/employer. One of your statements, "remaned to state in BEC", is a pretty wild guess and hard to believe. davidyee's case has much ealier PD with no problem, still got approved so late. Just want to know if there are other people with 45 letter and 2002 PD, still not appoved.

whatever2002,

Could you tell me what the "published rules" you meant. ? I really wonder to know them. I never heard anything about BEC published rules, all information what we had from official BECs with their predictions, rules (FIFO), 45 DL, finshing process in 2.5 years, did not come true.

I did not make any statements regarding your case and I believe nobody can do it. It is much easy to put off problematic case or requiring some investigation and move forward then to go deeply to the inquiries in it.

If your idea was to know more about similar cases like yours take a look at the BEC tracker Excel spreadsheet which JustWatching handles.
 
JustWatching said:
Hello Dallas BPC people,

I have added a column in the tracker that will not whether you received a state or regional NOF prior to being transferred to BPC. As always I can also add additional comments in the comments section.

Please post updates if you got an NOF. The more of you post the better info you will get to determine if that is A reason why some cases are being skipped.

JW
please update my record on the tracker.

PD 25 Nov 2002

EDD questioned the recruitment process (specifically the periodicals where adverts were placed)

Once they were satisfied they forwarded the case to the Labor Department November 21, 2003.

pegasus503
 
Justwatching

I have been absent for long time because of my personal stuff. Can you please paste link of the BPC tracker that you use to wonderfully maintain.

Thanks


JustWatching said:
Hello Dallas BPC people,

I have added a column in the tracker that will not whether you received a state or regional NOF prior to being transferred to BPC. As always I can also
 
Kanjoos said:
I have been absent for long time because of my personal stuff. Can you please paste link of the BPC tracker that you use to wonderfully maintain.

Thanks


JustWatching said:
Hello Dallas BPC people,

I have added a column in the tracker that will not whether you received a state or regional NOF prior to being transferred to BPC. As always I can also


Kanjoos,

Did you get your approval?
 
I don't think so

I do not think so. I have no clue, Last time when I checked was in October 1st week , I guess, and then it was still saying "RIR"

immi24 said:
Kanjoos,

Did you get your approval?
 
Kanjoos said:
I do not think so. I have no clue, Last time when I checked was in October 1st week , I guess, and then it was still saying "RIR"


PD of Jan 03! you should have received your approval. Did you get a NOF/request for information at state level?
 
Top